CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Cutting Edge Science

Cutting Edge Science

Started by Noah Diaz · · 👁 5 views · 22 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Noah DiazCarol Lopez23Ryan Gomez4crimsonhound80Hannah Alvarez2Sam WatsonMaria Parker77northernpilot2Brenda Gonzalez12Elizabeth CruzAlex Williams4rustydrifter10
Noah Diaz Noah Diaz Active MemberOP
114 messages
joined Sep 2021
#1 ·
Why does it feel like every single thread gets trashed and buried under endless bickering and blatant insults aimed at the exact same group of people?

Thanks
Carol Lopez23 Carol Lopez23 Member
30 messages
joined Apr 2005
#2 ·
It essentially boils down to the fact that those who subscribe to "alternative" viewpoints simply haven't mastered the art of productive conversation.
Ryan Gomez4 Ryan Gomez4 Active Member
112 messages
joined Feb 2013
#3 ·
I spend all day scrubbing posts from that crew, but while I'm asleep, they just flood the feed again. Maybe we need to start working in shifts.
crimsonhound80 crimsonhound80 Active Member
175 messages
joined Mar 2008
#4 ·
Kimberly White63 said:I spend half my day scrubbing posts from that crowd, but the second I close my eyes, they just flood back in. Honestly, maybe we should start working in shifts at this rate.

There’s actually an easier way to handle this.
You’ve got "tools" for that. 😉
Noah Diaz Noah Diaz Active MemberOP
114 messages
joined Sep 2021
#5 ·
The threads are turning into nothing more than troll pits, and even the moderators are getting in on the act.

Honestly, I don't see any point in posting there anymore.

Thanks,
Carol Lopez23 Carol Lopez23 Member
30 messages
joined Apr 2005
#6 ·
I believe this discussion fits perfectly within the scope of our current topic. It feels especially relevant if you are referring to the thread regarding living water. ☕
Noah Diaz Noah Diaz Active MemberOP
114 messages
joined Sep 2021
#7 ·
Is this reasonable? I think there’s a difference between expressing disagreement in a few posts and just dragging a thread out indefinitely just to be difficult.

I suppose the standard forum rules don't apply over on the Alternative board.

Thanks.

..... . . .. .
Hannah Alvarez2 Hannah Alvarez2 Active Member
54 messages
joined Jun 2013
#8 ·
Noah Diaz said:Is that fair? Look, there's a huge difference between politely disagreeing in a few posts and just dragging a thread through the mud forever.

I guess the standard forum rules don't apply over at Alternative.

Thanks for nothing.

..... . . .. .

That whole thread follows its own lunar cycles—totally fitting for a place called Alternative. When the moon hits its peak, everyone just loses their minds and flocks to the thread because they simply can't help themselves.😬
Sam Watson Sam Watson Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jul 2015
#9 ·
Keith Gonzalez said:The discussion fits perfectly within the scope of this thread, especially if you're referring to that whole thing about living water. ☕

Hahahaha 🤣🤣 god, give me strength 🤣
Maria Parker77 Maria Parker77 Active Member
81 messages
joined Apr 2018
#10 ·
I’ve gotta give it to Carol Lopez23 for being a solid moderator. Even when we’re dead wrong about each other's views, I never feel cheated by his oversight—which is a huge contrast to what happens over in the Spirituality section 🙄. You know, where things get messy. That guy Beljki constantly plays these psychological mind games, acting like some armchair detective without a shred of empathy. He uses those mod tools like a weapon, basically nuking entire threads and driving people away from the board.

He thinks there’s no room for Sai baba or Osho in any real spiritual discussion 🤦, which is such a shame because he used to follow them for years. Imagine how much wisdom people could actually share if he wasn't being so closed-minded.

Carol 👍

Ryan Gomez4 is a total classic, honestly 😁
Carol Lopez23 Carol Lopez23 Member
30 messages
joined Apr 2005
#11 ·
Wait, excuse me? 😁
Maria Parker77 Maria Parker77 Active Member
81 messages
joined Apr 2018
#12 ·
Keith Gonzalez said:Wait, what? 😁

I'm just kidding 😁

Miller said:🧐

👎

my first multi-quote 🥳
northernpilot2 northernpilot2 Active Member
201 messages
joined Oct 2013
#13 ·
Steven Davis63 said:I guess I’d actually give Carol Lopez23 some credit as a mod this time around, even though we don't see eye to eye on basically anything. I don't feel cheated just because he holds a mod position, which is something you definitely can't say about the Spirituality board...🙄 Beljki—well, let's just say certain folks—tend to psychologically harass people with this hyper-analytical, detective-style attitude that completely lacks any soul, and then they use their moderator tools to basically murder a discussion thread and drive everyone off the forum.

Sai baba and Osho don't have a place in his version of spirituality🤦 even though he spent years following them, which is kind of a shame because people could probably learn a lot more if they just kept quiet sometimes.

It feels like we have to repeat ourselves in every single thread, so here goes again.
If you’re planning on filing a complaint, you really need to include links to the specific instances you're talking about. General whining isn't going to fly, and frankly, nobody is even going to look at it.

Please just post the direct links to what you're complaining about and be crystal clear about the issue, otherwise, this whole thing is just going to end up being locked.
Maria Parker77 Maria Parker77 Active Member
81 messages
joined Apr 2018
#14 ·
Evidence? Give me a break! 😁

Look, I wasn't trying to overstep here. I’m just weighing in on spirituality and giving some props to the mainstream stuff... I’m not sitting here expecting everyone to agree with me or change their minds, okay? And seriously, if I’m actually breaking some rule again, just tell me straight up and I'll back off.

And about those comments—you only have to look at how many members here talk about things like tennis (which I'm obsessed with, played for 8 years, 🙂) compared to all this spiritual talk. ☕

I get it, I'm totally off-topic since the thread title is about something else entirely, but there are connections here if you really want to see them.

I'm staying out of this thread from now on, but please, don't delete my posts unless I'm actually violating the rules.
Noah Diaz Noah Diaz Active MemberOP
114 messages
joined Sep 2021
#15 ·
You really only need to skim through this thread to see what’s actually going on here (I’d suggest reading backward, from the most recent posts to the oldest):

none

Is water a living organism?

A journey through time

To be fair, things aren't all bleak. For instance, threads like Archaeology and Global Warming: Myth or just Californication? are handled with much more care and aren't subject to the usual scavenging. I appreciate the moderators for keeping everything running so smoothly.
northernpilot2 northernpilot2 Active Member
201 messages
joined Oct 2013
#16 ·
I’m just speaking in broad strokes here regarding all that whining about the state of those PDF files. Honestly, though, the same logic applies to pretty much everything else on this board.
If someone is going to sit there and complain about something, they really ought to back it up with actual links or some kind of proof, because I guess just throwing out vague, general grievances isn't really going to fly around here.
Maria Parker77 Maria Parker77 Active Member
81 messages
joined Apr 2018
#17 ·
Noah Diaz said:Honestly, if you just take a second to scroll through this thread, you'll see exactly what's going on here. Seriously, do yourself a favor and read it backwards—start from the very last page and work your way up to the first. You'll get the full picture that fast.

I don't even know where to start with this. Seriously, does anyone actually believe in that Sloot Digital Coding System nonsense? It sounds like something a tech bro would pitch you right before he disappears with your entire savings account. Is it even real? Or is it just another one of those buzzwords designed to make people feel like they’re missing out on the "next big thing" while they're really just being fleeced? I mean, come on. We've seen this movie before. You hear about some revolutionary way to code or structure data, everyone starts panicking because they think they're falling behind, and then—poof—it vanishes into thin air. Why are we even talking about this? Is there any actual substance there, or is it all just smoke and mirrors? Honestly, I'm skeptical. Extremely skeptical. Who's actually backing this? Because from where I'm sitting, it looks like a massive nothingburger. Just tell me: are we actually going to fall for this again?

Water... is it actually alive? Like, seriously, is there some kind of spark in there we're just totally missing? I’ve been spiraling on this one lately. Is it just a chemical compound, or is there something deeper, something almost biological about the way it moves and reacts? Does it have its own kind of consciousness? It sounds crazy, I know, but think about it. Just how much does everything depend on it? If water isn't "alive" in some fundamental sense, then what exactly are we even looking at when we stare into a stream? I'm genuinely losing sleep over this one. What do you guys think? Or am I just tripping?

Time travel. Seriously, can we just talk about this for a second? It’s one of those things that keeps me up at night, staring at the ceiling and wondering if we're all just living in some weird loop. I mean, think about it. We spend our whole lives obsessed with the past—nostalgia, history books, regret—but what if the door isn't actually locked? What if there’s a way to punch a hole through the present and land right in the middle of the Roaring Twenties or, I don't know, some crazy futuristic version of NYC where cars fly? Is it even physically possible, or are we just dreaming? People get all caught up in the math and the physics of it, but honestly, the logic puzzles are what drive me nuts. If you go back and change one tiny, insignificant thing—like stepping on a prehistoric bug or whatever that cliché is—do you come back to find out everyone speaks a different language? Or worse, does the entire timeline just fold in on itself like a cheap lawn chair? It feels like such a massive, terrifying concept, yet we just breeze past it every day. Are we stuck in a straight line, or is reality more like a giant, messy web? I’m leaning towards the web, personally. Everything feels connected, even if we can't see the threads. Just a thought. Anyway, what do you guys think? Is it a scientific miracle waiting to happen, or are we just chasing ghosts?

Can we please not make everything pitch black? Like, seriously, even just when picking a theme or something. It’s too much. Archaeology. Seriously, can we talk about this for a second? It’s one of those fields that people think is just digging up dusty old pots in some desert, but it’s way deeper than that. It's basically like being a detective, but instead of chasing suspects through downtown Chicago, you're chasing ghosts through the dirt. You're trying to piece together a giant, broken puzzle where half the pieces were lost thousands of years ago. Isn't that wild? I mean, how much of our own history do we actually get right? We walk past these massive ruins or old foundations in places like Boston or Charleston and just see "old buildings," but there's an entire world buried underneath our feet. Every shard of pottery or rusted tool is like a tiny, silent scream from someone who lived centuries ago. Does anyone else find that kind of eerie? Or am I just overthinking things again? Anyway, it’s fascinating stuff. Just pure, unadulterated mystery. I can't even begin to process this. What am I supposed to do with just an "i"? Is this some kind of test? Are you guys trying to see if I'll lose my mind? Because honestly, it's working. A single letter? Really? That's all we're working with here? Give me something to actually sink my teeth into! Any shred of context, any actual thought, anything! Or are we just staring at each other in silence now? Because if that's the plan, I've got better things to do. Is global warming an actual thing, or just some massive case of "californication"? They’re actually a little more insulated from all that cheapskate behavior than I thought. Honestly, props to the mods for handling things so professionally and keeping everything on track.

So, what exactly do you want from me? You want concrete evidence? Real claims? Give me something actual to work with here! Everyone’s just going along with it. Seriously, is anyone actually thinking for themselves anymore? It feels like everyone is just blindly following the herd. On threads like this? Look, I think it’s awesome that we can actually dive into this stuff and lay out our own perspectives. There shouldn't be any kind of "groupthink" or pressure to agree with everyone else like you see in those other subreddits. We aren't talking about cars here—these topics are on a whole different level. Abstract? Please. If you want to talk about things that don't actually mean anything, we can sit here all day, but let's be real—it's just noise. Why even bother getting into the weeds with stuff that has no substance? It's all just fluff. Honestly, this is spot on. Look, I get it—sometimes we push the boundaries of "polite society" and go a little overboard with how we say things, but you know what? It’s necessary. We're heading straight into these absolute extremes where you have to question everything. Like, what does it even mean to just *exist*? How do you even begin to define something like that? It's wild when you really think about it.

Look, if you want my advice? Just go dive into the natural sciences. Everything there is laid out so clearly and professionally—it’s actually civilized. But honestly, who cares about that when you've got everything else going on? It’s the end of 2015, for crying out loud. This probably means absolutely nothing to you anyway, right?

Just so we’re all on the same page here—because honestly, it’s common knowledge at this point—science has pretty much settled the debate: atoms are basically empty space. It sounds wild, I know, but it’s a fact. The actual material that makes up our so-called "physical reality"—yeah, even that screen you’re staring at right now—isn't really "there" in the way you think it is. Science tells us that if you look close enough, there's nothing actually holding it all together. Isn't that crazy?

What kind of conversations and evidence are you guys actually looking for? Seriously, what’s the endgame here?

Hey, what's up? Hey everyone! When things get heated and people start picking fights over the controversial stuff... 👍Look, I’ve only got one request here: Brenda Gonzalez12, if it isn't too much trouble, could you just wipe that signature of yours? It’s nothing but pure mockery at this point. Honestly, I could go on and start scrubbing plenty of his other posts too, but let's be real—mockery is where I draw the line. A heated debate? Sure. A little bit of a verbal jab or some light trash talk? Fine, whatever. But acting like a clown just to disrespect people? That’s just not okay. 😁Look, just my two cents here: you can say whatever you want, but leave the mocking out of the signature. Permanently. That’s where I stand on this.
Brenda Gonzalez12 Brenda Gonzalez12 Member
45 messages
joined Mar 2017
#18 ·
Steven Davis63 said:Honestly, if I were you, I’d definitely head toward the natural sciences. Everything there is laid out so clearly and presented in such a sophisticated, polished way—it’s really great. That being said, there just isn't any real alternative to what we're looking at here, especially since we're already staring down the end of 2015. But hey, that's probably totally irrelevant to you anyway!

Just wanted to let everyone know, It’s pretty much common knowledge these days—and honestly, most people just take it for granted—that atoms are mostly empty space. It’s one of those mind-bending facts that stays with you! You know, I was reading about this earlier, and it’s honestly mind-blowing. Science actually suggests that the very stuff making up what we call "physical reality"—including this exact screen you're staring at right now—doesn't really exist in the way we think it does! It’s one of those things that sounds totally wild when you say it out loud, but the data is actually there. Just a little something to chew on while you're scrolling!

Hey there! Just wanted to drop in and say hello to everyone! Hope you're all having a fantastic day so far. Hey everyone! When things get heated and we start diving into those controversial topics... 👍, Hey Brenda Gonzalez12, I have one tiny favor to ask—if it’s not too much trouble, would you mind deleting your signature? To be totally honest, it feels like a direct jab at us, and I'd really appreciate it if we could keep things a bit more friendly!, I honestly feel like I could have a field day with a bunch of his posts! There is just so much material to work with there.Look, I’m all for a good debate! If we want to go back and forth or even throw a little lighthearted jab at each other, that’s totally fine by me—I can handle a little banter. But honestly, making fun of me personally? That’s where I draw the line. Let's keep it respectful, okay? 😁Look, just my two cents here: if you're going to include a little jab in your signature, let's keep it classy. No permanent mocking allowed—that’s just my take on it!

Look, just to be crystal clear, nothing in my signature is meant to be a personal judgment, an opinion, or a final word on anyone specifically. As for what happened with Rocky, I’m simply pointing out something that guy actually said! He’s the one who started this entire thread—and honestly, he's been the one running the show in these discussions since they were first moved to the archives. He just went on a complete tear, insulting absolutely everyone in sight! So, I decided to just step away from that whole debate because, honestly, there’s just no point anymore! It all started when this one person tried to shut down an argument with a single word, using these totally flawed logical and mathematical conclusions. They were basically tossing out facts, asking themselves questions, and then immediately providing their own answers—it was a total loop! Once I pointed out a glaring mathematical error they made, things took a turn for the worse. Instead of owning up to it, they launched into this massive, unhinged barrage of insults all over the forum. And get this—if you look at their subsequent posts, they didn't just ignore the advice; they actually doubled down with a whole new series of... well, let's call them "jokes" meant to mock the topic. At this point, trying to have a rational conversation there is just a lost cause, so I'm officially bowing out!
Honestly, when it comes to Elizabeth Cruz, I’ve never seen such a massive wave of insults, condescension, sheer stupidity, and cynicism on this entire forum. It’s pretty much predictable at this point—anyone who dares to point out that she just copies and pastes other people's work, or mentions that she hasn't actually written even half a page of her own original thoughts, can expect the same toxic reaction every single time. It doesn't matter how you approach her, either. Whether you ask a question politely or not, she either refuses to answer or just drops a random link and calls it a day. And if you actually try to engage with her or call her out on it? That's when the real drama starts: she goes straight to clicking those little report buttons, spamming the moderation tools, and hurling insults. Seriously, if she just compiled a "best of" list of all the nonsense she's posted over the last six months, she’d have five full pages of material right there! I don't know what someone's educational background is, and honestly, it shouldn't even matter. If you truly know something about a subject, you should be able to have a real conversation about it—whether we're talking strictly hard science or something more experimental on the fringes. But this? This is just a mess. Science! It’s such an incredible field, isn't it? I honestly feel like we're living in the most exciting era to be curious about how the world actually works. Whether you're looking at the tiny, invisible building blocks of life or peering through massive telescopes at distant galaxies, there's just something so deeply moving about the pursuit of truth. I know I can get a little carried away—my friends always tell me I need to tone down the enthusiasm when I start rambling about physics or biology—but I just can't help it! There is a certain magic in the data, a way that everything eventually clicks into place once you find the right formula or observation. It’s not always easy, though; I definitely have those moments where I feel like I’m staring at a puzzle with half the pieces missing, feeling a bit silly for thinking I could solve it. But hey, that's all part of the fun, right? That "aha!" moment makes all the confusion totally worth it!I mean, calling this a "field of nonsense" is a bit much! If we’re going to be that pedantic, why don't we just start a whole new thread asking, "Is Little Red Riding Hood actually a real person?"
Look, just to be crystal clear, none of my signatures are meant to be personal attacks. They’re really just a little visual highlight reel of the absolute nonsense I run into on a daily basis around here! Honestly, if you want examples of people who are totally out of touch with actual science—or even just basic facts—you really can't do better than Rocky and Elizabeth Cruz. Their takes are classic examples of being completely disconnected from reality.

Actually, I’m going to ask my friend Maria Parker77 to dig up some of my old "gems" just so I can have a good laugh at myself! Honestly, I’ve written so many posts over the years that seeing a few of my old ridiculous takes would genuinely make my day.
Maria Parker77 Maria Parker77 Active Member
81 messages
joined Apr 2018
#19 ·
You're spot on
Elizabeth Cruz Elizabeth Cruz Newcomer
9 messages
joined Apr 2017
#20 ·
Ethan Brooks59 said:Look, nothing in my signature is meant as a personal attack or a judgment of anyone. Regarding Rocky, I’m talking about a guy who started this whole thread—one of those threads they eventually lock up—and spent the entire time insulting everyone who dared to point out his obvious logical and mathematical blunders. He just states his "facts," asks himself questions, and then answers them himself. Once someone pointed out a blatant math error he made, he just went on a total tear, hurling insults all over the forum. Honestly, if you look at his subsequent posts, he didn't just refuse to take advice; he doubled down with a series of, frankly, pathetic little jabs. So yeah, I stepped away from that topic because there’s zero point in arguing with him anymore.
As for Elizabeth Cruz, I haven't seen this much condescension, stupidity, and cynicism on this board in a long time. Anyone who points out that she just copies and pastes other people's work—that she hasn't actually written half a page of her own content—can expect the same treatment. Every time someone asks a question, whether they're polite or not, she either ignores it or just drops a random link. If you push back, she starts clicking the report button and throwing insults. If she just posted a "greatest hits" collection of the nonsense she's spewed over the last six months, she'd have five pages of text right there. I don't know what your educational background is, and honestly, it doesn't matter; if you actually know something, then we can talk. Whether it's mainstream science or something on the fringes. But this thread is supposed to be on the edge of science, not a playground for idiots. Let's not pretend; if we wanted that, we'd start a thread asking, "Is Little Red Riding Hood a real person?"
So, my signature isn't an ad-hominem attack; it's just a snapshot of the daily "highlights" we deal with here. Rocky and Elizabeth Cruz are textbook examples of inaccuracy and attitudes that have nothing to do with the fringes of science, or science in general.

By the way, I'll ask my colleague Maria Parker77 to list my own "highlights" so I can have a good laugh too. I've written so many posts I'd love to see which ones

Do you really think citing Wikipedia gives your arguments any weight? It looks nice on paper (in theory), sure.
But in reality, distinguishing actual science from "pseudoscience" is a nightmare. There’s plenty of research out there that lacks a solid theoretical foundation, plenty of papers reviewed by incompetent experts, and countless results that are nearly impossible to verify. Plus, scientists find it incredibly hard to admit when their theories are wrong or outdated. That's why you have to be extremely careful when labeling something "pseudoscience," and even more cautious when calling something "science."
I'm not forcing my opinions on anyone; I'm just stating them like everyone else. Sometimes, when I'm short on time, I'll share links to things I find interesting regarding the topic. I don't always include the sources because some users accused me of "promoting" sites for profit. It seems pointless to try and paraphrase or "translate" what someone else wrote in my own words anyway. These links and descriptions just show different perspectives that don't always fit into the "textbook" mold; they just show that alternative views exist. Besides, most of the "knowledge" people claim to have is really just them quoting someone else.
That user Zecopas was the first one to put my handle in his signature specifically to mock me, and you jumped right in to support him and did the exact same thing without my permission.
Is this even okay?
By justifying that kind of attitude, they claim to be promoting science as an inspiration for the younger generation, but they’re doing the exact opposite. They’re just killing off any dissenting opinion with their vulgar, low-class behavior on this forum.
It’s funny how the insults always start flying the second I show them something they don't want to hear—let alone see. Some of these people have never seen certain things in their lives.
If only they could say it without the insults. But no, apparently it's too much to ask to string two sentences together without every other one being total garbage or pure stupidity.
And then we're supposed to think their opinions actually matter?
Who exactly?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads