CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › IT › Software › Dual-core processors

Dual-core processors

Started by Terry Chase8 · · 👁 4 views · 10 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Terry Chase8John Palmer4Michelle Sanchez2Bryan Kern6James Roberts87
Terry Chase8 Terry Chase8 MemberOP
12 messages
joined Jul 2009
#1 ·
Look, here's the deal: everyone knows we've been flooded with dual-core processors lately. The real question is, how much does an average user actually get out of them?
What I'm really wondering is this; is there any software out there that lets you manually shift certain apps to run on a different core, since Windows doesn't seem to utilize both cores... which drives me crazy...
Got this Core 2 duo proc. that I can't even use properly... 😠
And what's the deal with 64-bit Windows, can they actually take advantage of the extra power somehow?
Also, what's the plan for Vista... is it actually going to be worth anything...
thx... 😁
John Palmer4 John Palmer4 Active Member
50 messages
joined Oct 2008
#2 ·
Just open up Task Manager, right-click on the process you want, and then hit "Set Affinity." Easy as that!
Terry Chase8 Terry Chase8 MemberOP
12 messages
joined Jul 2009
#3 ·
Sweet!
One more thing though, most apps say they work on both cores...
Is that actually true, or are they just running on the first one (CPU 0)?
John Palmer4 John Palmer4 Active Member
50 messages
joined Oct 2008
#4 ·
If you’ve got both hooked up, the workload will shift between them—or even hit both at once if the app is smart enough to handle dual processors—depending on how heavy the load is. But, if you set it to run on just one CPU, then that's exactly where it'll stay.
Terry Chase8 Terry Chase8 MemberOP
12 messages
joined Jul 2009
#5 ·
Aha, I get you. So if one core gets "full," it just shifts the load to another one...
Does that mean the first core is basically the default or what?
I'm wondering if I can take one specific program or game and force it onto a single core, just so it doesn't have to deal with all the other background junk...🙂
John Palmer4 John Palmer4 Active Member
50 messages
joined Oct 2008
#6 ·
Seriously, though, what on earth are you even doing while you're gaming? 😁

The only thing I ever did while playing Tactical Ops was burning DVDs. One core would handle the game, and the other would just chew through the discs. Everything ran smooth as silk.

But hey, as for the default settings... I’m gonna pass on that one.
Michelle Sanchez2 Michelle Sanchez2 Member
21 messages
joined Apr 2008
#7 ·
As far as I am aware, Windows recognizes dual-core processors and AT&T hyper-threading as two logical processors, which allows Windows to manage both cores as needed. The real issue lies with modern applications, which seemingly lack the basic intelligence to actually utilize dual-core architecture effectively.
Terry Chase8 Terry Chase8 MemberOP
12 messages
joined Jul 2009
#8 ·
John Palmer4 said:Alright, for real though... what exactly are you doing while you're gaming? 😁

The only thing I was doing while running Tactical Ops was ripping DVDs. One core handled the game, the other chewed through the discs... everything ran smooth as silk...

So, what's the default one... I wouldn't even go there...

Forget the games, I was mostly thinking about the software...
It’s not like this is gonna change my life or anything, but I really just wanna see what those two cores can actually do...
Anyone know if there's a list out there for programs that run on both...?
Did a little Googling, but came up empty...
Yeah, thanks for the help...
Bryan Kern6 Bryan Kern6 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Mar 2005
#9 ·
Michelle Sanchez2 said:As far as I know, Windows sees dual-core and AT&T processors as two logical processors, so Windows can juggle both cores whenever it needs to. The real issue is that modern apps just don't "know" how to actually tap into those extra cores.

Same here... when one core is busy, some other program just jumps on the second one automatically. You really see it when a program crashes and pegs one core at 100%... Windows just keeps running smooth without a hitch...

Plus, I haven't really run into any software that runs a single task across both cores at once—though I guess they exist out there...

Bryan Kern6🤔
James Roberts87 James Roberts87 Active Member
61 messages
joined Mar 2011
#10 ·
Bryan Kern6 said:I haven't stumbled upon any software that handles a single operation on both cores simultaneously either—but I'm sure they exist out there somewhere...

Bryan Kern6🤔

You don't even need that.
Bryan Kern6 Bryan Kern6 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Mar 2005
#11 ·
Totally on board with that... Just replying to the guy...👍

Bryan Kern6🤔

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads