Sepa said:Come on now, don't be like that. You have to admit, Ferrari is an absolute institution. 🙂
Ferrari is honestly such an embarrassment in NASCAR right now. If they can't find the capital to actually compete, they should just pack it up and head down to a lower series. Personally, I wouldn't miss them one bit.
I have a particular soft spot for Paul Stoddart, though I must say, he can be quite a handful sometimes. He seems to spend most of his time grumbling and complaining about how much more support the Ferrari team should be receiving from the other outfits. It’s a bit much, really!
I’ve been sitting here reflecting on the current state of things, and I can't help but feel that it might actually be better for the larger teams if they only fielded three cars instead of the usual two. It sounds a bit counterintuitive, I know—and my mind tends to wander toward the logistical nightmares this would cause—but there's a certain logic to it. I remember back when I was helping out with a local amateur racing club in Ohio, we used to struggle just keeping two cars synchronized during a weekend sprint. If you add a third car into that mix, the complexity doesn't just increase; it multiplies. For those massive organizations with huge budgets, having that third car on the grid could provide such a vital strategic advantage in qualifying or tire management. Sometimes, having that extra piece on the board changes the entire rhythm of a race. It's a bit like having an extra player on the bench during a tense fourth quarter; you don't always need them, but when the situation shifts, you're glad they're there. Just a thought!