CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Fish and her ego

Fish and her ego

Started by Jamie Bishop29 · · 👁 4 views · 1 reply

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Jamie Bishop29rustydrifter10
Jamie Bishop29 Jamie Bishop29 NewcomerOP
3 messages
joined Feb 2018
#1 ·
To whom it may concern,

First and foremost, I am expecting an apology from the moderator. Furthermore, I expect these points to be removed from my account. There isn't a single logical argument to justify this style of communication toward people contributing to the astrology section—people who unselfishly share their knowledge to improve the quality of this subreddit. This isn't the first time a moderator has attempted to degrade a conversation partner by deleting my posts or moving them between threads, which effectively strips them of all meaning and context.
It seems clear to me that most of you don't truly grasp what is happening here. However, those who actually follow astrology know just how much time and effort goes into posts like these. It makes me wonder: what kind of ego must one possess to feel so threatened that they resort to deleting content and issuing infractions against those simply sharing their expertise?

I expect an apology, the restoration of my post, and the removal of that insulting moderator comment.

http://www.reddit.com/showthread.php?t=250328&page=12

http://www.reddit.com/showpost.php?p=6...&postcount=238

A comment like that is neither polite nor appropriate. It shouldn't be permitted for anyone, not even for the moderators.

Dear Jamie Bishop29,

you have received an infraction AT Reddit.

Reason: commenting on moderation
-------

-------

This infraction is worth 35 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:
http://www.reddit.com/showthread.php?p=67404611
Quote:
Quote:
Fish 1968 says: Look at the post
You already copied it on the previous page, so combined with the one in the main topic, we have it three times now. Please, let's try to keep things concise.

Is that even possible? Forgive me, but I have no idea where my contributions to this subreddit actually end up once you start shuffling posts between different topics.
You should be grateful for my time and effort, Fish; you don't read posts like these every day.

Quote:
Baphomet says: Look at the post
You've twisted that quite beautifully and made it confusing.

I was merely noting that Mars, as the ruler of Scorpio, can be considered wet, unlike Venus, which doesn't hold rulership over water signs.
I thought you were writing about retrograde phases. Clearly, we aren't communicating very well; you sort of tangled the planetary rulerships into the discussion about planetary motion, then added distance into the mix, and so on... And you haven't answered a single one of my questions, interesting...

But to make our communication easier, here is Lilijev's table, from which both the characteristics and temperaments of the planets are derived based on whether their movement is retrograde or direct. One just needs to remember that Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars show a better nature when they are oriental, while the other planets show it when they are occidental.

All the best,
Reddit
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#2 ·
The moderator was totally justified in pulling that post down, and honestly, the warning was more than fair. As for you, you probably deserved a formal strike for that comment too—you should just be glad you didn't get one!

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads