forum.us?

(I'm not entirely sure which sub-forum this belongs in, so I'll just drop it here.) Maybe it should have gone under "Help"?

I understand there are various moderators handling different threads, but who actually owns this site? Who has the final say around here?

I see different mods managing specific sections, but who is the head administrator?

The reason I ask is because, specifically in the politics section, it feels like the moderators are pushing their own political agendas. It reeks of that extreme liberal social agenda currently being forced upon the American people by the administration.

Every single time I start a thread asking serious questions about issues affecting the American people and our country—questions that clearly bother someone—the thread gets nuked. I've even been banned a couple of times myself. When I reached out to a moderator on a different thread to ask for clarification, they politely told me they didn't know and that they only manage their own section, suggesting I contact the politics mods instead. Then, when I tried to ask the person who actually banned me why it happened or why my thread was deleted, all I got was a link to the sub-forum rules stating that we shouldn't question moderator decisions. After that, I was just ignored. Shouldn't regular users have a right to know why?

So, I'm turning to the rest of you users: does anyone know who is truly in charge here? It feels like someone is hiding behind the rulebook to promote political stances that are dangerous for the American people, systematically deleting any viewpoints or questions that don't align with their specific agenda.

We see it everywhere lately—more and more forums and major news outlets (like the New York Times) seem to be bought and paid for, peddling propaganda to mislead the American people and manufacture a warped, questionable sense of morality.

Until recently, I had the impression that this forum was a place where we could have decent discussions about real problems and point them out. Clearly, that isn't the case in the politics section. So, I’m back to my original question: who is ultimately responsible for this?

Anderson

Since this forum is mostly funded by Freemasons and LGBT advocacy groups, why is it considered strange or controversial that it leans toward a communist-nostalgic vibe? It’s not a public service, so it’s perfectly legitimate. ☕ 👍

The secondary question you raised was answered promptly; if you feel the need, feel free to reach out to the owner directly to discuss whatever is bothering you.
Though, perhaps such a step isn't even necessary at this stage. Every PDF board has its own moderators—who are listed on the forum root before you even enter a subforum—as well as supermoderators, and collectively, we all have admins available. There is certainly no shortage of people to turn to regarding specific inquiries or issues.

As for everything else, the job of a moderator is to moderate, which largely involves steering discussions and shutting down certain threads. I won't—nor do I wish to—comment on every single topic of yours that has been removed, but I did take a quick glance at the last four or five posts of yours deleted from the Politics section, and they were all taken down for valid reasons. A forum might be a freer medium than, say, a scientific symposium, but that doesn't mean one can wander around posting nonsense about, for instance, treason, regardless of how serious you might consider your own arguments to be.

How can such a massive betrayal of the people be dismissed as mere stupidity? 🤦

Suppose I were to argue that the lyrics of Jack Houdak carry satanic undertones—that his entire body of work is actually a calculated attempt to dismantle the core values of our civilization. If I were to go so far as to label him a messenger of Satan and a traitor to the human race, and then someone comes along and deletes my thread for "posting nonsense," I would have to ask: how exactly can the betrayal of humanity and the service of Satan be considered mere nonsense?
That’s the gist of it.
I shall leave the matter there for now. Reach out to whomever you feel compelled to contact if you believe it necessary.