CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Free Radicals

Free Radicals

Started by Joshua Stewart16 · · 👁 4 views · 11 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Joshua Stewart16Ashadowgardener12Casey Palmer5nimblemarlin80Ethan Martinez11darkbison81
Joshua Stewart16 Joshua Stewart16 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined Oct 2003
#1 ·
I’ve heard it suggested that free radicals (FR) are generated by increasing oxygen intake within the body. It is widely understood that FR damage our cells and accelerate the aging process. Therefore, does more oxygen consumption actually lead to faster aging? We pursue sports primarily to maintain our youth, don't we?

Does it make any sense to engage in intense athletic training if it ultimately exhausts us and hastens the aging process?

One potential solution is maintaining a diet rich in antioxidants to neutralize those free radicals. But which specific foods are high in antioxidants?

😉
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#2 ·
Antioxidants:
VITAMIN C: strawberries, kiwi, kale, spinach, cabbage, green bell peppers, broccoli, oranges, lemons, grapefruit...

VITAMIN E: whole grains, apricots, walnuts, almonds, hazelnuts, peanuts, wheat, fish oil...

BETA-CAROTENE: yellow and orange fruits and veggies, dark leafy greens, eggs, milk, butter, spinach, broccoli, tomatoes, peaches...

Antioxidants help fight against: cancer, heart disease, and the aging process.

I’ve also heard that free radicals actually destroy muscle tissue and other parts of the body.
While regular exercise helps strengthen your antioxidant defense system, intense, heavy training can actually increase free radical production.
shadowgardener12 shadowgardener12 Active Member
186 messages
joined Dec 2002
#3 ·
Maybe Casey Palmer5 will finally have something to say 🙄 that actually makes sense.
I’m talking studies and hard data... because you can't just claim free radicals are caused by extra oxygen intake without proof. So, Casey Palmer5. :?
Casey Palmer5 Casey Palmer5 Regular
470 messages
joined Jan 2016
#4 ·
Do you really think there are people here who actually live around this area?

I’m really hoping someone reaches out, because honestly, I am just completely wiped out right now...
nimblemarlin80 nimblemarlin80 Member
28 messages
joined Dec 2003
#5 ·
I caught this documentary on NBC the other day about the aging process, and they brought up free radicals as a negative byproduct of mitochondrial activity—basically, the energy production side effect. Please, don't come for me if I've completely misinterpreted the science here. 🙄
I wasn't paying close enough attention to catch the nuance, so I’m left wondering: are these free radicals the sole culprits behind tissue decay and the whole aging thing?
shadowgardener12 shadowgardener12 Active Member
186 messages
joined Dec 2002
#6 ·
🙂 Mitochondria handle that, but there are different kinds of "free radicals." Someone ought to know the difference... maybe darkbison81...
But they aren't the "main" culprit behind aging. 😉

The how and why of aging isn't going to be fully explained anytime soon.

See, some cells don't age—they just constantly renew themselves, like sperm cells. Scientists have more or less figured out that mechanism, but trying to "turn it on" in other cell types leads straight to cancer. Everything has its limits, and everything serves a purpose in the evolution of a species... what kind of species would we even become? If every idiot on the planet didn't age... the species wouldn't survive. It brings us back to those theories where individual development is secondary to the survival of the species.

On an individual level, you'll have to look into other methods of cellular regeneration 😉
nimblemarlin80 nimblemarlin80 Member
28 messages
joined Dec 2003
#7 ·
shadowgardener12 said:🙂 Mitochondria do that, but there are different types of "free radicals." Should anyone actually know the difference? Maybe darkbison81 would have an opinion on that...
But they aren't the "main" culprit behind aging. 😉

The "how" and "why" of aging won't be fully explained anytime soon.

Look, certain cells don't age; they constantly renew themselves—like sperm cells. Science has more or less figured out that mechanism, but trying to "switch it on" in other cell types just triggers cancer. Everything has its limits, and everything serves a purpose in the evolutionary development of a species. How else could a species evolve if every idiot lived forever? Such a species wouldn't survive. It brings us back to that theory: individual development is secondary to the survival of the species.

On an individual level, you'll eventually have to look into other methods of cellular regeneration. 😉

That whole thing about cancer—it’s linked to growth hormone usage, right? I'm no expert, I just saw it in that documentary 😉 )
And here we are, debating aging versus species survival... maybe the species would evolve differently. Maybe it would impact reproductive cycles since adults would stay in their prime longer. Maybe that's not a bad thing, or maybe it is... alright, I'm just rambling now. 😁 It would be nice to hear from darkbison81 🙂 or unknown when they have some free time. 🙂
In my view, it isn't even about extending life indefinitely; it's about improving the quality of life during those 70, 80, or let's say 90 years we get. 😉
shadowgardener12 shadowgardener12 Active Member
186 messages
joined Dec 2002
#8 ·
It’s not just about growth hormone. I mean, sure, that plays a part, but we're talking about a completely different mechanism here.

It's tied to the cell's biological clock and its genetic code.

Some cells are hardwired to regenerate—we actually know which transmitters trigger that process. But when you try to flip that switch on cells that aren't naturally built for it, you run right into cancer, or at least a massive spike in risk.

That’s the core issue. Theoretically, we could try to force other cells to regenerate, but it leads straight to malignancy. (Growth hormone is one thing, working on a hormonal level... this is deeper, at a much lower level. I'm not sure how deep, though I'm sure hormones and transmitters are involved too. It also involves gene editing... if I remember correctly.)
It kind of leaves you with the impression that the rest of our cells don't matter. Like they're just there to keep reproductive cells functioning, while everything else is left to wither away. 😉 It all comes down to their programmed expiration date—for real—and whatever external factors hit them along the way.
shadowgardener12 shadowgardener12 Active Member
186 messages
joined Dec 2002
#9 ·
I’d take an extra lifetime right now. You really think all those dictators lived through another full life cycle? They didn't. They were gone. Just ask 😁. If they’d stuck around even 30 years longer, God knows what kind of mess the world would be in today... 😲 😲 sorry guys...
Ethan Martinez11 Ethan Martinez11 Member
23 messages
joined Apr 2007
#10 ·
It is my understanding that Anto Đapić holds rather radical views. 😁 I am also aware that he operates with complete freedom. It is quite a shame, really. One wonders why he isn't behind bars. 😉
darkbison81 darkbison81 Active Member
169 messages
joined Feb 2003
#11 ·
I see you guys were looking for me. I haven't been around much lately...
It’s an established fact that free radicals—those reactive molecular forms with unpaired electrons—damage cellular components like our DNA, which ultimately compromises the cell itself. Aging is an inherent biological process, and we wouldn't be dealing with it if free radicals didn't exist (we actually touched on this during a science discussion regarding immortality and stuff like that). By the way, if anyone is daydreaming about living forever, let their first thought be "tumor." That’s what true immortality looks like.
I don't have the data right in front of me, but I remember seeing a graph a long time ago clearly illustrating how harmful oxidation is. Honestly, who can blame us? We live in an oxidizing, corrosive atmosphere and breathe in a toxic substance called oxygen. 🙂 Just look at what oxygen does to a piece of iron; it’s easy to see it does the exact same thing to us. 😉

Unfortunately, we don't really have a choice in the matter...

Got to run, I'm short on time...
shadowgardener12 shadowgardener12 Active Member
186 messages
joined Dec 2002
#12 ·
Thanks a ton! 😁 😁 🙂 --> immortality and the first thought of cancer! There are some different ideas in there, 🙄 like works by Mircea Eliade, though they don't really have anything to do with biology...

But I think I get it now—how one of the most vital processes in Yoga actually works, and why it slows down aging. It’s pranayama, or breath control. In pranayama, you aim to slow the breathing as much as possible, shortening the inhale moments while extending the pauses between breaths, eventually reaching those long holds. All this happens while keeping the body and brain fully functional. Basically, pranayama is about "nourishing" the cells and slowing down the entire metabolic turnover. You can only pull that off if the whole system is highly energized—meaning the entire body needs to be in peak condition to achieve it. That’s why it’s nearly impossible without clearing out obstacles first (illness, various blockages, alcohol, drugs, cigarettes, heavy food). You need to slow down oxygen absorption and metabolism, allowing for a deep relaxation of the entire organism.
Just a quick thought 😉 the regenerative effects of Pranayama are vast and numerous... 🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads