#1 ·
So, here’s a situation unfolding in Washington, D.C.: a patient is currently being treated at Hospital A. He needs several diagnostic tests performed, which happen to be a bit more expensive for the facility to run. Instead of just getting on with it, Hospital A suddenly claims they can't perform them and tells him he needs to go to Hospital B. When he shows up at Hospital B, they pull this ridiculous stunt where they claim they don't perform tests for patients who aren't "theirs," suggesting he check back in a month or two when they might actually be able to help.
Naturally, nobody is willing to put any of this nonsense in writing.
A few questions:
1. What is this logic regarding being a "Hospital A" versus a "Hospital B" patient? This man is a Medicare beneficiary; shouldn't he have the right to receive treatment at any facility that holds a contract with Medicare?
2. What legal or administrative hurdle prevents him from simply registering for those tests at the second hospital?
3. Who should he file a formal complaint with at Medicare, given that both hospitals are failing to meet their contractual obligations?
Naturally, nobody is willing to put any of this nonsense in writing.
A few questions:
1. What is this logic regarding being a "Hospital A" versus a "Hospital B" patient? This man is a Medicare beneficiary; shouldn't he have the right to receive treatment at any facility that holds a contract with Medicare?
2. What legal or administrative hurdle prevents him from simply registering for those tests at the second hospital?
3. Who should he file a formal complaint with at Medicare, given that both hospitals are failing to meet their contractual obligations?