CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › In Her Shoes

In Her Shoes

Started by redowl90 · · 👁 4 views · 5 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants redowl90slyrider16David Jackson2Jessica Nguyen85Walter Vaughn3
redowl90 redowl90 RegularOP
287 messages
joined Aug 2005
#1 ·
A really pleasant surprise...
Personally, I’m a big fan of Hanson’s work, and I honestly think this movie would have missed the mark if any other director had helmed it...

Cameron Diaz is perfectly fine, but Toni Collette is absolutely brilliant!
Not to mention my soft spot for my favorite, Shirley...

Rating: 4 (definitely worth a watch)

👍
slyrider16 slyrider16 Active Member
60 messages
joined Mar 2006
#2 ·
Alright, gonna answer Gerald Barrett25 since he felt the need to get all polite with me on that Oliver Twist thread. 😁

The whole point of this movie is just making bank. Period. You could overanalyze it and say maybe Hanson wanted to try his hand at a different genre since he hasn't done a chick flick before... or maybe he was aiming to turn a basic Hollywood script into something actually decent... whatever. Look, I watched it. It’s fine for what it is. Funny, easy to watch, though the ending gets a little pathetic... but it doesn't really offer anything new. Just a solid, standard genre exercise.
David Jackson2 David Jackson2 Active Member
55 messages
joined Mar 2023
#3 ·
slyrider16 said:So, I finally sat down and watched it. Honestly? It’s a decent enough flick if you’re into that genre—funny, easy to watch, even if the ending feels a little too much like it's begging for your sympathy. But let's be real, it doesn't really break any new ground. It’s more like a solid, well-executed genre exercise than anything groundbreaking.

Yeah, I'm right there with you. 🙂>
Jessica Nguyen85 Jessica Nguyen85 Active Member
162 messages
joined Jul 2003
#4 ·
The whole point of this movie is just to make money. End of story. You could overanalyze it and claim maybe Hanson wanted to branch out since he hasn't really done a chick flick before, or perhaps he was trying to elevate a standard Hollywood script into something more elevated than usual. Or whatever. Anyway, I watched it. It’s fine. For its genre, it works—funny enough, easy to watch, though the ending gets a little pathetic. It doesn't offer anything truly groundbreaking, though. Just a decent, technically correct exercise in genre filmmaking.

Not bad... with talent like yours, you could probably defend any movie directed by Jakob Sedlar... especially that little phrase it's fine, for its genre 😉 😁

//ps. also thanks for the sharp breakdown; I can definitely use this when my better half asks why I shouldn't bother watching it 😬
slyrider16 slyrider16 Active Member
60 messages
joined Mar 2006
#5 ·
Gerald Barrett25 said:It’s not terrible... with talent like yours, you could defend pretty much any movie by Jakob Sedlar... especially that phrase it’s totally fine for that genre 😉 😁

Sedlar is indefensible. Unless "Jakob Sedlar movies" is actually its own tiny little subgenre. 😁

Gerald Barrett25 said://ps. also thanks for the sharp breakdown, I can definitely use that when my girl asks why she shouldn't bother watching this flick😬

If she's into girly movies, she'll probably dig this since it feels better made than your average trash in that category. As for the guys—aka you, 😁—there's enough funny bits and maybe 15 minutes of half-naked C. Diaz scattered throughout to keep you from passing out... 🙂
Walter Vaughn3 Walter Vaughn3 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Mar 2007
#6 ·
I actually found this little clip pretty charming.

I’d definitely recommend it to the guys—it's the perfect thing to show a girl on a first date if you want to set the right mood.
🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads