CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Psychology › Jodi Arias

Jodi Arias

Started by feralhound17 · · 👁 4 views · 11 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants feralhound17Brenda Hayes2Samuel Harris10David Bishop3Michelle Evans
feralhound17 feralhound17 MemberOP
13 messages
joined Apr 2013
#1 ·
Just looked at the photos—at first glance, it’s obvious this woman is incredibly skilled with makeup and total transformations.
https://www.google.com/search?q=jodi+...n2IcXlPK_FgdAJ
From a sexy blonde—maybe even too sexy—to this naive, innocent, intellectual librarian vibe with posture so soft you’d think she wouldn't even crush a mosquito.
For a second, I almost thought—no, there's no way she could have done it.
But honestly, it's possible someone actually advised her to pull off those looks.

Asking how people like this are made is a stupid question.
In different circumstances, maybe she wouldn't have done what she's accused of, and then she wouldn't be categorized this way in the first place.
My take is that there is always some kind of trigger or reason why someone does something—regardless of how banal that reason might seem to the people watching.
Either way, her methods are extremely masculine, since these kinds of crimes are usually committed by men.

Samuel Harris10 said:Something feels off to me. So, the verdict came out today, and she was found guilty. Okay, one conclusion is that she's a pathological liar, a sociopath, and a psychopath—which she probably is. But my impression is that while any sane person would find this an enormous stress, she looks like she's just living her life, like she's actually enjoying all of this.

If someone truly doesn't care whether they spend their whole life in a cell, face execution, or walk free later, the only thing that's obvious is that the person doesn't feel like they're losing anything significant—not through imprisonment, and not even through death.

I've been following this high-profile trial here in the States, and it's a shame there aren't more broadcasts available.

As for this blonde, my first thought is how many forum members will see her and think about how hot she is, thinking she shouldn't have killed him but could have just been with one of them instead.
Brenda Hayes2 Brenda Hayes2 Newcomer
4 messages
joined May 2013
#2 ·
Samuel Harris10 said:I suppose one reasonable conclusion is that she’s a pathological liar, a sociopath, and a psychopath—which she almost certainly is.

Your conclusion is a bit of an oversimplification.🙂 Until recently, experts who hadn't personally examined her were merely speculating that Jodi isn't some simple sociopath, pathological liar, or narcissist as the media portrays her, but rather someone struggling with borderline personality disorder (BPD).

Among them, Dati Archer was the first to publicly identify the diagnostic criteria for BPD within Jodi's behavior:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...ality-disorder

Sheila Wendler, a forensic psychiatrist based in Hawaii, holds the exact same view:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_2528011.html

Finally, Dr. Janeen DeMarte, an official witness for the District Attorney's Office, precisely diagnosed Jodi as having BPD during the trial just three weeks ago.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/jodi-arias-...ry?id=19028331

Samuel Harris10 said:But how does someone like that even develop? Is it nature and genetics, or a combination of environmental factors?

In their book, The Borderline Personality Disorder Survival Guide, specifically in the chapter titled "what causes borderline personality disorder" on pages 41-60, Alex L. Chapman, Kim L. Gratz, and Perry d. Hoffman acknowledge that scientists have only just begun to solve the complex BPD puzzle. Nevertheless, they boldly conclude in the text that the most common cause of BPD is biological—specifically involving reduced functionality in the prefrontal cortex, or impairment of the amygdala and hippocampus—thereby challenging the rigid, outdated notion that BPD is caused exclusively by childhood trauma.

feralhound17 said:Just looked at the photos—at first glance, it’s obvious this woman is incredibly skilled with makeup and total transformations.
https://www.google.com/search?q=jodi+...n2IcXlPK_FgdAJ
From a sexy blonde—maybe even too sexy—to this naive, innocent, intellectual librarian vibe with posture so soft you’d think she wouldn't even crush a mosquito.
For a second, I almost thought—no, there's no way she could have done it.
But honestly, it's possible someone actually advised her to pull off those looks.

Asking how people like this are made is a stupid question.
In different circumstances, maybe she wouldn't have done what she's accused of, and then she wouldn't be categorized this way in the first place.
My take is that there is always some kind of trigger or reason why someone does something—regardless of how banal that reason might seem to the people watching.
Either way, her methods are extremely masculine, since these kinds of crimes are usually committed by men.

If someone truly doesn't care whether they spend their whole life in a cell, face execution, or walk free later, the only thing that's obvious is that the person doesn't feel like they're losing anything significant—not through imprisonment, and not even through death.

I've been following this high-profile trial here in the States, and it's a shame there aren't more broadcasts available.

As for this blonde, my first thought is how many forum members will see her and think about how hot she is, thinking she shouldn't have killed him but could have just been with one of them instead.

Because of generalizations like that, several people on this forum have been banned multiple times, and threads have been shut down... ☕

Just so you're aware, BPD is officially classified as a disorder that affects roughly 2-3 percent of the total population according to the World Health Organization (WHO). To break that down further, women make up about 75% of cases, while men account for the remaining 25%.
Samuel Harris10 Samuel Harris10 Newcomer
8 messages
joined May 2013
#3 ·
That first link is actually solid—I think it lays everything out perfectly and does a great job explaining the preliminary steps. But I have to wonder... does her behavior afterward actually align with that? If we're following that logic, she should have acted out of pure impulse—you know, driven by a sudden burst of jealousy or that frantic fear of being abandoned. According to that theory, she was the one being manipulated, yet her conduct following the event just doesn't seem to back that up. Instead, she puts on this whole theatrical production—singing during interrogations, turning things upside down, laughing... then at the trial, she’s actively trying to pull everyone's strings. She stays so detached, almost narcissistic, even though it's pretty obvious her defense team was working overtime to help her present a completely different image to the public.
Brenda Hayes2 Brenda Hayes2 Newcomer
4 messages
joined May 2013
#4 ·
feralhound17 said:Just looked at the photos—at first glance, it’s obvious this woman is incredibly skilled with makeup and total transformations.
https://www.google.com/search?q=jodi+...n2IcXlPK_FgdAJ
From a sexy blonde—maybe even too sexy—to this naive, innocent, intellectual librarian vibe with posture so soft you’d think she wouldn't even crush a mosquito.
For a second, I almost thought—no, there's no way she could have done it.
But honestly, it's possible someone actually advised her to pull off those looks.

Asking how people like this are made is a stupid question.
In different circumstances, maybe she wouldn't have done what she's accused of, and then she wouldn't be categorized this way in the first place.
My take is that there is always some kind of trigger or reason why someone does something—regardless of how banal that reason might seem to the people watching.
Either way, her methods are extremely masculine, since these kinds of crimes are usually committed by men.

If someone truly doesn't care whether they spend their whole life in a cell, face execution, or walk free later, the only thing that's obvious is that the person doesn't feel like they're losing anything significant—not through imprisonment, and not even through death.

I've been following this high-profile trial here in the States, and it's a shame there aren't more broadcasts available.

As for this blonde, my first thought is how many forum members will see her and think about how hot she is, thinking she shouldn't have killed him but could have just been with one of them instead.

Sorry, I have to circle back to this claim of yours. I’m not at all surprised by your conclusion, nor do I blame you for it. It is perfectly clear to me that your perception is warped and that you are a victim of a systemic media campaign—which, in the US (at least as long as I can remember campaigns against sexual violence have been waged here), boils down to portraying men as the sole aggressors. Not long ago I wrote about how such falsified, intentionally unorganized, and unprofessional data processing has led us to a credibly convincing number one spot WORLDWIDE for the number of male perpetrators (a staggering 96.2%). So, if that were actually true, I would wonder how American women can even live alongside their so many bloodthirsty males, and why they haven't all moved to Canada, or at least Jordan, Guinea, Zambia, Sierra Leone, Laos, or Ethiopia where they might feel significantly safer.

On that note, I want to add something regarding this topic of Jodi, because I find it baffling why the American public hasn't reacted with the same level of outrage toward the crime committed by Ana Magaš, who also has BPD and who, according to her attorney's testimony, is a manipulator, and who did not kill her husband from behind in self-defense. Jodi is portrayed globally as a "psychopath," while the perpetrator Ana is treated almost like a saint here; meanwhile, her butchered late husband is characterized by leading women's organizations as a typical male abuser who more than deserved his fate, resulting in him being doubly victimized without any shred of piety regarding his death.

In the scientific article Borderline Personality and Criminality, a detailed clinical psychiatric study on the makeup of prisoners convicted of the most serious felonies is presented:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2790397/

The authors presented data showing that research indicates generally 25 to 50% (depending on the specific country) of the TOTAL number of convicts have borderline personality disorder. That is drastically higher than the 2-3% of people with BPD found among the general population outside of prison, as I have already noted. The data is grouped by various parameters; for instance, in the United Kingdom, out of 90 convicted murderers, as many as 49 have BPD, whereas in France, "only" 8 out of 99 murderers have BPD, and so on....

However, the national statistics from all these studies clearly demonstrate that among those convicted of the most serious felonies, the number of female prisoners with BPD is three to eight times higher than the number of males with BPD. (For example, in Germany, 5.3% of men in prison have BPD, whereas there are as many as 42.9% female BPD prisoners).

Therefore, crimes like the one committed by Jodi Arias are mostly committed by women. Using methods that are three to eight times more "distinctive" than those of men. 😢
feralhound17 feralhound17 MemberOP
13 messages
joined Apr 2013
#5 ·
Brenda Hayes2 said:Your conclusion is a bit of an oversimplification.🙂 Until recently, experts who hadn't personally examined her were merely speculating that Jodi isn't some simple sociopath, pathological liar, or narcissist as the media portrays her, but rather someone struggling with borderline personality disorder (BPD).

Among them, Dati Archer was the first to publicly identify the diagnostic criteria for BPD within Jodi's behavior:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...ality-disorder

Sheila Wendler, a forensic psychiatrist based in Hawaii, holds the exact same view:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_2528011.html

Finally, Dr. Janeen DeMarte, an official witness for the District Attorney's Office, precisely diagnosed Jodi as having BPD during the trial just three weeks ago.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/jodi-arias-...ry?id=19028331

In their book, The Borderline Personality Disorder Survival Guide, specifically in the chapter titled "what causes borderline personality disorder" on pages 41-60, Alex L. Chapman, Kim L. Gratz, and Perry d. Hoffman acknowledge that scientists have only just begun to solve the complex BPD puzzle. Nevertheless, they boldly conclude in the text that the most common cause of BPD is biological—specifically involving reduced functionality in the prefrontal cortex, or impairment of the amygdala and hippocampus—thereby challenging the rigid, outdated notion that BPD is caused exclusively by childhood trauma.

Because of generalizations like that, several people on this forum have been banned multiple times, and threads have been shut down... ☕

Just so you're aware, BPD is officially classified as a disorder that affects roughly 2-3 percent of the total population according to the World Health Organization (WHO). To break that down further, women make up about 75% of cases, while men account for the remaining 25%.

What I said isn't some sweeping generalization—it’s just that the way he goes about things is fundamentally masculine. I mean, it’s pretty obvious since the vast majority of people using that approach are men anyway.
Women rarely rely on brute force or weapons—men aren't exactly known for using those "feminine" methods either, like poisoning or smothering someone with a pillow (which, let's face it, is the classic move for those "Angel of Death" nurses). It’s just different.

When it comes to abandonment in disorders like BPD or psychopathy—it’s a different beast entirely. A person with BPD might kill their partner in a moment of pure, blind rage just to stop them from leaving—to prevent that abandonment from happening. A psychopath? They’ll kill her later, as a sort of calculated punishment because she actually had the nerve to walk away.
It works the same way with women, too—I guess.

Psychopathic murders following a breakup feel eerily similar to patterns seen in certain Islamic or more primitive Western cultures—places where a woman just mentioning to her family that her partner doesn't love her anymore or has left her can trigger a death sentence. In those settings, the family steps in and basically tells the guy he either stays with her or dies. It's a dark parallel, I guess.
It’s similar to those cases where things drag on for years—a guy realizes the relationship just isn't working and decides to walk away—and then the girl's dad, who was already picturing the wedding and a dozen grandkids with his wife, snaps, commits a premeditated murder, and heads straight to prison.
With psychopaths, the logic works on a pretty much identical principle—except the psychopath basically lumps themselves and their entire family into one single, messy unit.

Brenda Hayes2 said:Your conclusion is a bit of an oversimplification.🙂 Until recently, experts who hadn't personally examined her were merely speculating that Jodi isn't some simple sociopath, pathological liar, or narcissist as the media portrays her, but rather someone struggling with borderline personality disorder (BPD).

Among them, Dati Archer was the first to publicly identify the diagnostic criteria for BPD within Jodi's behavior:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...ality-disorder

Sheila Wendler, a forensic psychiatrist based in Hawaii, holds the exact same view:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_2528011.html

Finally, Dr. Janeen DeMarte, an official witness for the District Attorney's Office, precisely diagnosed Jodi as having BPD during the trial just three weeks ago.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/jodi-arias-...ry?id=19028331

In their book, The Borderline Personality Disorder Survival Guide, specifically in the chapter titled "what causes borderline personality disorder" on pages 41-60, Alex L. Chapman, Kim L. Gratz, and Perry d. Hoffman acknowledge that scientists have only just begun to solve the complex BPD puzzle. Nevertheless, they boldly conclude in the text that the most common cause of BPD is biological—specifically involving reduced functionality in the prefrontal cortex, or impairment of the amygdala and hippocampus—thereby challenging the rigid, outdated notion that BPD is caused exclusively by childhood trauma.

Because of generalizations like that, several people on this forum have been banned multiple times, and threads have been shut down... ☕

Just so you're aware, BPD is officially classified as a disorder that affects roughly 2-3 percent of the total population according to the World Health Organization (WHO). To break that down further, women make up about 75% of cases, while men account for the remaining 25%.

Everything in that link related to point number one—it could just as easily be psychopathic manipulation, pure obsession, and total fixation. It feels like there’s zero empathy involved—just a desperate attempt to reclaim some sense of "ownership."

I don't find her behavior all that strange—honestly. I guess I just view it through the lens of someone believing they have a fundamental right to own another person. It’s a mindset that's actually celebrated in certain cultures, anyway.
I mean—if someone stabs another person that many times, the way she did it? There’s gotta be some massive amount of rage involved. I guess. Maybe.
She was acting like some messed-up Arab guy who hasn't quite made up his mind about whether to murder his "lost love" or not.

People with BPD handle breakups way better than psychopaths do—I mean, it’s pretty obvious why. BPD types are just more sensitive and prone to falling hard, which makes it easier for them to idealize someone new or jump straight into finding a potential partner. Psychopaths? Not so much. They have almost zero emotional capacity and struggle to actually connect with anyone. So, when they lose a partner they actually had some sort of constructive feelings or plans for, that loss hits them like a freight train. It's a massive shock to deal with—maybe because they actually felt something for once, but yeah, it's a much heavier burden for them to carry.
When a psychopath loses someone they actually care about, it’s devastating—but honestly? They probably regret it mostly because they missed out on an opportunity to exploit them. It's a weird dynamic—their only real tether to being anything other than purely calculating is that tiny spark of emotion or positive connection. Once that's gone, a person with BPD will just devalue them, move on to someone else, and immediately start idealizing the next target.

Brenda Hayes2 said:Sorry, I have to circle back to this claim of yours. I’m not at all surprised by your conclusion, nor do I blame you for it. It is perfectly clear to me that your perception is warped and that you are a victim of a systemic media campaign—which, in the US (at least as long as I can remember campaigns against sexual violence have been waged here), boils down to portraying men as the sole aggressors. Not long ago I wrote about how such falsified, intentionally unorganized, and unprofessional data processing has led us to a credibly convincing number one spot WORLDWIDE for the number of male perpetrators (a staggering 96.2%). So, if that were actually true, I would wonder how American women can even live alongside their so many bloodthirsty males, and why they haven't all moved to Canada, or at least Jordan, Guinea, Zambia, Sierra Leone, Laos, or Ethiopia where they might feel significantly safer.

On that note, I want to add something regarding this topic of Jodi, because I find it baffling why the American public hasn't reacted with the same level of outrage toward the crime committed by Ana Magaš, who also has BPD and who, according to her attorney's testimony, is a manipulator, and who did not kill her husband from behind in self-defense. Jodi is portrayed globally as a "psychopath," while the perpetrator Ana is treated almost like a saint here; meanwhile, her butchered late husband is characterized by leading women's organizations as a typical male abuser who more than deserved his fate, resulting in him being doubly victimized without any shred of piety regarding his death.

In the scientific article Borderline Personality and Criminality, a detailed clinical psychiatric study on the makeup of prisoners convicted of the most serious felonies is presented:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2790397/

The authors presented data showing that research indicates generally 25 to 50% (depending on the specific country) of the TOTAL number of convicts have borderline personality disorder. That is drastically higher than the 2-3% of people with BPD found among the general population outside of prison, as I have already noted. The data is grouped by various parameters; for instance, in the United Kingdom, out of 90 convicted murderers, as many as 49 have BPD, whereas in France, "only" 8 out of 99 murderers have BPD, and so on....

However, the national statistics from all these studies clearly demonstrate that among those convicted of the most serious felonies, the number of female prisoners with BPD is three to eight times higher than the number of males with BPD. (For example, in Germany, 5.3% of men in prison have BPD, whereas there are as many as 42.9% female BPD prisoners).

Therefore, crimes like the one committed by Jodi Arias are mostly committed by women. Using methods that are three to eight times more "distinctive" than those of men. 😢

The issue with people living with BPD is that they tend to overreact—their emotions are just dialed up way too high.
If you grab someone with BPD by the throat and they notice a gun tucked in your waistband, they’ll react like you’re definitely planning to beat them and shoot them. Or if they think you might assault them and see a knife, they’ll jump to the conclusion that you're going to rape, mutilate, and kill them right then and there.
People with BPD don't think in terms of "this is just a fight"—they don't see a scuffle as just a scuffle. They view everything through the lens of the absolute worst-case scenario, escalating to the final level immediately. It's because they aren't just perceiving a real threat; they're reacting to a *potential* one, too.
Magaš went way beyond self-defense.
It's not like he told her his mistress was pregnant or that he was leaving her—she didn't have any justification for murder under the guise of "self-defense" by using some diagnosis as an excuse.
feralhound17 feralhound17 MemberOP
13 messages
joined Apr 2013
#6 ·
It’s pretty interesting how someone can act completely unhinged in an interrogation room, only to flip the switch and play the picture of innocence once they hit the courtroom. Given how calculated this whole thing seems—especially with her calling for Travis after the murder, acting like she has zero clue he’s actually dead—it feels obvious to me that she’s just playing the odds to see which persona gets her the best outcome.
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50143400n
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBtaktP9JRE
http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/news/nat...rrogation-room

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50146453n

Anyone who has ever watched a single crime drama knows that interrogations and questioning sessions happen behind one-way glass or are recorded.

http://radaronline.com/exclusives/20...sing-argument/
"After having sex with him and taking nude photos of each other, Arias stabbed Alexander in the shower and again on the bathroom floor, Martinez said. He was stabbed yet again as he stood, trying to gain his balance, and another knife blow to the back of his head came as he stood over the sink, the prosecutor said.

“He is trying to get away from her,”revealed the skilled lawyer as he flashed a series of crime scene photos, revealing the bloody trail, including a rainbow shaped smear of blood on the hallway wall where Alexander collapsed"

Kinda intriguing that she killed him right after they had sex.
Maybe she felt like she was being used.
feralhound17 feralhound17 MemberOP
13 messages
joined Apr 2013
#7 ·
I managed to milk it for all it was worth—she definitely had way too many expectations
http://crime.about.com/od/current/a/jodi_arias.htm

It was a super brief relationship—the kind where Travis keeps her hidden, blabbing about her while treating her like some casual hookup until he’s ready to dump her for good. And instead of losing interest in a guy that messed up, she just gets more obsessed—until everything finally boils over into murder right after they sleep together.
Her ex is named William Angela—could be an Italian connection, maybe—and those guys and their families are known for having massive expectations when it comes to relationships.
Samuel Harris10 Samuel Harris10 Newcomer
8 messages
joined May 2013
#8 ·
I think you’re overstating her obsession with him—honestly. She went straight to another guy's place after the murder and stayed there for a few days, which suggests she had other options lined up. It’s hard to argue she was totally idolizing this one guy when she was already moving on.

And that part where she’s singing? She knew the cameras were rolling. That’s such a classic psychopathic trait—most people would be spiraling under that kind of pressure, but for her, it was probably the highlight of her life. It feels like she only truly feels alive in these extreme, high-stakes situations; the things that bring regular people joy just seem to leave her feeling empty. Even the song choice is interesting—it's hard to believe it was just a coincidence.

"I didn't hear you leave, I wonder how I am still here, I don't want to move a thing, it might change my memory.. i do what i want by i can't hide i cannot be until you are resting here...".
Samuel Harris10 Samuel Harris10 Newcomer
8 messages
joined May 2013
#9 ·
Just because someone has BPD doesn't mean it's automatically the root cause of their actions. Take Dahmer, for instance—he had BPD, but that wasn't the reason he became a serial killer; rather, it was seen as this dark intersection where his sexuality collided with incredibly morbid impulses. In my view, every one of these individuals is a unique case study—it’s a mistake to try and shove them all into neat little percentage boxes or one single category. He was an oddity even by those standards, standing apart from your typical serial killer profile. I wouldn't necessarily label him a psychopath; it felt more like he was simply overpowered by his own urges. It’s hard for those of us without the diagnosis to wrap our heads around, but imagine being driven by sexual impulses toward such things—knowing it's wrong, yet finding it nearly impossible to ignore. If he weren't a psychopath, it suggests he likely had to get heavily intoxicated every single time just to shut his conscience off. Psychopaths don't really have that struggle.
David Bishop3 David Bishop3 Member
16 messages
joined May 2013
#10 ·
Look, I’m not saying I’m excusing her actions—I’m really not—but I also don't feel the need to sit in judgment when someone commits a murder fueled by this kind of romantic fallout. At the end of the day, one person felt their time was being wasted, and things ended on a disastrous note.

There are countless cases where a guy is out there building a vision of the future—thinking about a house, kids, a life together—only to have his bank account drained and his heart ripped out, leading him to snap.
It isn't exactly shocking.
And honestly, I don't see why these so-called experts need to be handing out diagnoses unless it’s part of a fake legal defense; in certain parts of the world, this kind of motive is tragically common.
Sure, maybe that’s a hard pill to swallow here in the States, but it’s certainly not unheard of globally.

As for all that singing and "athletic stretching"—maybe she is unhinged, sure. Or maybe she just feels so incredibly secure in herself that she’s completely relaxed in someone else's space—his territory, essentially. Then again, she might just be playing the "crazy" card, knowing it could play beautifully in her favor during a trial later on.

From the links provided, it seems painfully obvious to me that this woman was likely his initial fascination, but eventually, she just became the "hot, silicon-blonde backup plan"—someone kept on the sidelines for trips, hookups, or photo ops. She clearly took it way too seriously, especially since she was already introducing herself to his friends at his own house as his "woman," in that very specific, definitive sense.

What the evidence shows is that she walked away from a three-year relationship just to be with this Travis, even moving to his state to make it work. Instead, he crushed her hopes and expectations by keeping her as an option and finally dumping her completely, telling her he never wanted to see her again—though he did agree to meet up one last time before she headed back to California, which resulted in sex right before the murder.
Why would he let her into his house after rejecting her? Unless, of course, he was hoping for another "casual hangout" (which, predictably, left her feeling used).
It wasn't out of love, that's for sure—you don't keep people you love on a leash.

I honestly don't understand how the timeline isn't screaming the truth at everyone.
A woman ends a long-term relationship with an older partner to move away for this young, superficial guy—who was clearly juggling a blonde fling and dating around—and then, once he makes it clear he's done with her, the blonde obviously goes into a rage and lashes out.

Where is the article or the link regarding this other individual??
David Bishop3 David Bishop3 Member
16 messages
joined May 2013
#11 ·
If you look at the link below, it’s glaringly obvious—this woman's behavior shows massive amounts of rage stemming from her totally skewed perception of their relationship compared to his. And honestly, how does any normal guy (and I mean *normal*) continue to sleep with a woman after all that?

The only way that happens is if he viewed her as nothing more than a casual hookup from the very start—someone he never actually took seriously.

If he had respected her in any capacity, there is no way he would have let her back into the house after what she did—let alone taken nude photos, which just leaves you incredibly vulnerable. And heaven forbid he'd go as far as having sex in the shower right before being killed.
A camera and some photo fragments were found in the washing machine; the shots clearly show they were taken just moments before the murder occurred.

http://radaronline.com/exclusives/20...eavesdropping/
Michelle Evans Michelle Evans Regular
320 messages
joined Jan 2013
#12 ·
necunecu said:I wasn't sure if this was allowed here, but there was a case that got quite a bit of national media coverage.
/cut/

No. We close threads like this because they inevitably devolve into amateur psychology regarding people currently under investigation.

Per the forum rules:
5) Threads involving the following topics are subject to automatic closure:

/cut/

- threads centered on armchair psychoanalysis or speculating about individuals involved in active criminal investigations, whether by nature of the topic or because the thread was opened specifically to discuss a certain case.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register