#1 ·
On Alternative, it has been common knowledge for quite some time that Louis is essentially fighting ghosts. She views everyone as a clone, hunting down individuals who have simply crossed her, while in reality, she lacks even the most basic competency required for moderation.
She defends the illegal distribution of MSM, provokes users by posting utter nonsense, and when she issues a ban, she refuses to provide an honest justification.
Take the situation with Hoyt, for instance. She initially banned him under the claim that he was a clone. Once his appeal to the admins proved otherwise, she conveniently shifted her stance; suddenly, he was just "insulting users," leading to those legal threats we saw...
Is such behavior permissible for a moderator?
Furthermore, this woman has been exiled from virtually every other online community. She attempted to pose as a physicist with a fancy degree, only to be exposed as someone lacking even a high school education. She tried to play psychologist in spirituality circles, where she was equally unmasked. Why is this unfortunate individual—driven by malice and a vendetta because she failed to land the man of her dreams, which was her true original motive—still being permitted to serve as a moderator on this forum?
And a word of caution: do not attempt to suppress this. Posts like these will become increasingly frequent, and one cannot rule out a direct attack on the forum itself, fueled by civil disobedience against the injustice of allowing incompetent moderators to thrive through public scrutiny.
Because eventually, the mad moderators depart. You will ultimately strip them of their power. But the users who were wrongly banned remain banned. That is fundamentally wrong...
She defends the illegal distribution of MSM, provokes users by posting utter nonsense, and when she issues a ban, she refuses to provide an honest justification.
Take the situation with Hoyt, for instance. She initially banned him under the claim that he was a clone. Once his appeal to the admins proved otherwise, she conveniently shifted her stance; suddenly, he was just "insulting users," leading to those legal threats we saw...
Is such behavior permissible for a moderator?
Furthermore, this woman has been exiled from virtually every other online community. She attempted to pose as a physicist with a fancy degree, only to be exposed as someone lacking even a high school education. She tried to play psychologist in spirituality circles, where she was equally unmasked. Why is this unfortunate individual—driven by malice and a vendetta because she failed to land the man of her dreams, which was her true original motive—still being permitted to serve as a moderator on this forum?
And a word of caution: do not attempt to suppress this. Posts like these will become increasingly frequent, and one cannot rule out a direct attack on the forum itself, fueled by civil disobedience against the injustice of allowing incompetent moderators to thrive through public scrutiny.
Because eventually, the mad moderators depart. You will ultimately strip them of their power. But the users who were wrongly banned remain banned. That is fundamentally wrong...