#1 ·
phiber said:Following a discussion with the admin, the problematic posts have been removed.
Furthermore, the moderation team has determined that this community doesn't need someone with your particular brand of discourse—someone who openly discusses disclosing an HIV status to women for whatever various reasons might exist.
You can apply for an appeal in 6 months.
I truly believe we are looking at a dangerous precedent here—actually, I sincerely hope it *is* a precedent—that someone can be arbitrarily slapped with a six-month ban just because they voiced an opinion (which, I should add, was exceptionally well-argued) and the mods decided that they simply don't want someone representing those views.
I’ve combed through the site rules, and I haven't found a single mention of such a penalty; so, if it isn't explicitly in the rules, one has to wonder what the point of having rules even is if the moderators can just bypass them whenever they reach a private agreement among themselves. It is frankly baffling to me how individuals who behave in such a manner could ever be entrusted with moderating any platform whatsoever.
I would normally upload this to a subreddit for banned users, but since I am currently banned from that specific subreddit, I am unable to post there.