CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Betting Forum › NBA Betting: Vol. 2

NBA Betting: Vol. 2

Started by Lawrence Castillo76 · · 👁 3 views · 11 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Lawrence Castillo76graniteotter6Dana Baker2
Lawrence Castillo76 Lawrence Castillo76 NewcomerOP
2 messages
joined Apr 2022
#1 ·
Frank Vogel is shaking up the starting five to give some guys a breather. Tonight against Detroit, we're looking at Ja Morant, Paul George, Dahntay Jones, David West, and Jeff Pendergraph in the lineup
graniteotter6 graniteotter6 Member
49 messages
joined Jan 2016
#2 ·
Dana Baker2 said:I’d probably start with Washington +9.5/over 100.5 and the Brooklyn Nets +8.5. I'll likely just play 3 or 4 smaller bets to keep the stakes low.

Did you manage to dig up any intel?

I went with the Washington over, along with the Brooklyn Nets, but I won't double down on those.
I didn't get a chance to use Portland today, so I might look at them.
Dahntay Jones is questionable.
Calderon is also questionable for a blowout game.
Booker is questionable too.
graniteotter6 graniteotter6 Member
49 messages
joined Jan 2016
#3 ·
Dana Baker2 said:The Memphis guys have gone 6-0 on the over lately. I guess that might look promising to some, but personally, I find that a bit hard to swallow.😛

Maybe it’s in favor of the under? It definitely doesn't look like we're headed for a 6-0 run on the over.
Dana Baker2 Dana Baker2 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2011
#4 ·
graniteotter6 said:Probably in favor of the under? It’s definitely not looking like a 6-0 sweep for the over.

Yeah! Seems weird to me too, but here we are.

So, this is what I'm riding with:
Brooklyn Nets +8.5
Washington over 100.5
plus
Cleveland +13.5 (everyone's talking about it, so why not? 😁)
Portland under 96.5

What do you think is the better play for Washington—the over or the spread?
graniteotter6 graniteotter6 Member
49 messages
joined Jan 2016
#5 ·
Dana Baker2 said:Which looks better to you for the Warriors—the over or the spread?

The over, I suppose, since that's what I ended up taking myself.
Though, to be fair, I did play the spread indirectly by also having the Charlotte Bobcats under. 😁
But it’s been bugging me lately; I remember hitting an under on the Memphis-GSW 98 game. Now I look at how Dallas put up 182 right after that, and then Portland went over 180 last night. It seems almost impossible.
Dana Baker2 Dana Baker2 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2011
#6 ·
[No content provided to rewrite] kaže:
Whatever—I played him myself.
To be honest, I’ve played the handicap too—though more indirectly. I also have the CHA under. 😁
It’s actually eating at me a little—I remember hitting the Memphis-GSW 98 under, but then I see Dallas putting up 182 right after that, and now Portland dropping over 180 last night? No way. It's impossible.

I finally pulled the trigger on those 4—now I've got zero clue what to cut.😁
Look, I’m talking about the 6 head-to-head matchups over—not this season's version of Memphis!
graniteotter6 graniteotter6 Member
49 messages
joined Jan 2016
#7 ·
Dana Baker2 said:I ended up taking those 4 at the end, though I'm not quite sure what else to cut.😁
I was betting on the over for the last 6 head-to-head matchups, not this current version of Memphis!

Haha, you were the one asking what to take out. If you'd asked about Portland, man, you wouldn't be in this spot.
🤦 You didn't really explain the over part clearly either. 😁
Dana Baker2 Dana Baker2 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2011
#8 ·
graniteotter6 said:Haha, you asked what to take out. If you wanted to talk about Portland, man, you should've just asked like that.
🤦 regarding the overs. You didn't explain that part right either 😁

Look, I didn't ask what to take out! I said I was gonna play all 4, and I did.😉 I thought maybe eventually I'd go with 3 for the heavier games, but there's no point.
And as for the overs—I didn't put them in the head-to-heads, you're right there.

Just wait until we see those tough unders in Indiana and Milwaukee...🤣
graniteotter6 graniteotter6 Member
49 messages
joined Jan 2016
#9 ·
I’ve already 😂 since you said "it's a blowout" 👍
And then they end up in Washington with a score of 100-101. 🤣
Dana Baker2 Dana Baker2 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2011
#10 ·
graniteotter6 said:I've been 😂 since you said "all in"👍
And they'll end up going 100-101 in Washington. 🤣

When?
graniteotter6 graniteotter6 Member
49 messages
joined Jan 2016
#11 ·
Dana Baker2 said:Do you think the Charlotte Bobcats need to pull off a massive upset at some point?🤣

I suppose there isn't much to say here. 😁
Read this quickly before they delete us. 😁
Dana Baker2 Dana Baker2 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2011
#12 ·
graniteotter6 said:Man, 😁
Read faster—they're gonna delete this. 😁

Look, I know I wrote that, but I don't get what you meant by putting 101-100?😕 What were you even thinking there?

The Charlotte Bobcats are insane! They're leading!

restlessmaker9 said:Was Granger even playing?! I can't find him anywhere—is he even on the bench?!

He's hiding!🤣
Check the earlier posts! He isn't playing tonight. Cancel it!😁

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads