Nikki, I need your input!

So, we’re about two weeks out from this:

The response "The moderator already explained the rules, you're just being provocative" isn't much of an answer, especially after that very same moderator told me to take my grievances up with you.
Why don't you tell me what you actually think about all this? After all, isn't that the whole point of the Politics subforum?

I didn't start this thread because I'm on some crusade against wind farms. No, I started it to establish the editorial policy for the natural science subforum—and by extension, how my contributions (and everyone else's) should be handled there. This specific pattern of "discussion" seems to trigger every single time someone's opinion happens to clash with a moderator's personal views.

Honestly, rustydrifter10, I think it’s pretty obvious from your posts why you ended up banned; this whole argument is just completely unnecessary. You were basically screaming at us. And look, I know you didn't technically use all caps, but when you dump massive walls of bolded text in giant fonts like that, it feels exactly the same. Even just regular shouting would feel less aggressive than what you pulled there. It’s just not how people communicate on the internet, and it's definitely not the vibe of this forum. It comes off as totally hostile and confrontational, which is essentially what yelling is.

On top of that, you kept playing dumb, poking at people just to get a reaction, throwing shade at the moderators, and generally being disrespectful. That’s the real reason why you—and everyone else who got kicked out—faced the consequences. It applies to this situation, too.