CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Quick question about editing and...

Quick question about editing and...

Started by Samuel Palmer10 · · 👁 3 views · 8 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Samuel Palmer10Benjamin Nelson8wiredangler5
Samuel Palmer10 Samuel Palmer10 NewcomerOP
7 messages
joined Oct 2009
#1 ·
Why was my post

And generally speaking, I'd appreciate it if someone could look over my posts from today that were edited or erased in the "Parents & Kids" section

Thanks in advance 🙂
Benjamin Nelson8 Benjamin Nelson8 Active Member
146 messages
joined Aug 2006
#2 ·
The sentence was erased:
If you get a pamphlet from the Storks, throw it straight in the trash (it wasn't worded exactly like that, but you get the idea).

I deleted the sentence because it triggered yet another massive debate about the Storks, cults, Jehovah's Witnesses, and the whole conversation spiraled completely off course...
Samuel Palmer10 Samuel Palmer10 NewcomerOP
7 messages
joined Oct 2009
#3 ·
Brenda Barrett58 said:The sentence was erased:
If you get a pamphlet from the Stork, throw it straight in the trash (not verbatim, but that’s the gist).

And the reason it was deleted is because it reignited the whole debate about the Storks, the cult, Jehovah's Witnesses, and the entire topic spiraled completely off course...

My inquiry to the FBI wasn't aimed at you, but you answered anyway. You're still a party to the dispute.
I know exactly why you deleted it.
Benjamin Nelson8 Benjamin Nelson8 Active Member
146 messages
joined Aug 2006
#4 ·
The protocol is pretty straightforward: if an FBI moderator creates something that warrants a new thread on the FBI boards, they need to provide their own explanation.
wiredangler5 wiredangler5 Active Member
54 messages
joined Mar 2013
#5 ·
From what I can tell, most of what was removed was just off-topic stuff. The moderator actually explained exactly what was cut from the post and why it was edited. What else is there to complain about, and what kind of response are you expecting from Brenda Barrett58?
Samuel Palmer10 Samuel Palmer10 NewcomerOP
7 messages
joined Oct 2009
#6 ·
wiredangler5 said:From what I can tell, most of what was deleted was just off-topic stuff...

If you’ve looked and you’re calling it off-topic, who am I to argue...
And you said "mostly," not exclusively...
wiredangler5 said:The moderator actually explained exactly what they deleted from the post, basically why it was edited.

But there's still no answer as to why they wiped out the on-topic posts...

wiredangler5 said:What else is there to complain about that you aren't expecting an answer to from Brenda Barrett58?

Where does it say this is a formal complaint?
Even if it were, I don't see anyone here willing to help...😉
wiredangler5 wiredangler5 Active Member
54 messages
joined Mar 2013
#7 ·
Samuel Palmer10 said:If you’ve already looked at it and decided it’s off-topic, who am I to argue?
So you're saying I'm being too extreme instead of just being specific. My bad.

But she still hasn't explained why she started flooding the on-topic posts.

If you feel like some posts should have stayed up, Brenda Barrett58 already explained why they were removed. Only she can say exactly why those specific ones were deleted, since she’s the one moderating this thread. She's also the only one who can explain her reasoning behind deleting, editing, or flagging anything. Neither I nor the other moderators here can speak to that, because she's running this entire section.
Like I said, we drifted off-topic for a bit, but Brenda Barrett58 can give you the rundown on the actual subject.

If you're only looking for answers in posts that you consider on-topic, then I don't see why you'd write this to Brenda Barrett58 when she'll show up in this thread anyway:

Samuel Palmer10 said:My question on the FBI forum wasn't directed at you, but thanks anyway for weighing in. You're actually a party to this dispute yourself.
I know exactly why she deleted it.


Samuel Palmer10 said:Where does it say this is an appeal?
Even if there were, I can see there isn't any bread here. 😉

I don't know, I'll leave that up to you. You're the one who started this thread, not me. 😉
Benjamin Nelson8 Benjamin Nelson8 Active Member
146 messages
joined Aug 2006
#8 ·
Topic: "Baby in 3 days - what should I expect?"
Nine posts were deleted, and every single one was off-topic. It was all nonsense about Owlet monitors, cultists, those Happy Baby bundles (people arguing over whether to get them since Owlet doesn't approve, etc.), leaking private info for the Happy Baby kits, and even someone trying to drag another user into an argument on a different thread...

Not a single one of those deleted posts actually had anything to do with this topic...
Samuel Palmer10 Samuel Palmer10 NewcomerOP
7 messages
joined Oct 2009
#9 ·
I see where this is headed,
thanks everyone,
we'll cross paths again, I'm pretty sure 🙂
lock it

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads