CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › IT › Hardware › Desktops › RAM issues

RAM issues

Started by Ethan Davis · · 👁 4 views · 14 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Ethan DavisNancy Adams30crimsonstag84Kimberly Gomez34Jerry Collins7graniteharbor85fadedorca66
Ethan Davis Ethan Davis NewcomerOP
6 messages
joined Aug 2013
#1 ·
So, I picked up a new rig about two months ago, and after wrestling with a dozen different headaches, I’ve managed to stumble upon yet another one.
I went into the BIOS and set the Intel XMP to profile 2 (that would be DDR3 2133 with timings of 11-12-11-30 at 1.60V). According to the BIOS itself, the speed is sitting right at 2133MHz, just like you see here:

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2463o1y&s=5

But then, when I dig into the more detailed settings, it claims my max bandwidth is only 1333MHz:

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=33xtzsg&s=5

And wouldn't you know it, the Control Panel is also reporting that lower number under the speed section:

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=v8o4gh&s=5

If anyone could point out what I'm missing here, I'd really appreciate the help. Thanks in advance for any insight.
Nancy Adams30 Nancy Adams30 Newcomer
1 message
joined Aug 2013
#2 ·
What processor are you running?
Just caught this 😁
I had the same issue on an i3, where it wouldn't go past 1333, but looks like you aren't dealing with that.
Ethan Davis Ethan Davis NewcomerOP
6 messages
joined Aug 2013
#3 ·
CPU: AMD 6800K
So, here we are. I'm looking at this kit: 2400 MHz Kingmax HyperX, running in a 2x4 GB configuration. Just sitting there. Is it enough? Does anyone actually care anymore? Probably not. But here we are.
Motherboard: MSI FM2-A85XMA-E35
Ethan Davis Ethan Davis NewcomerOP
6 messages
joined Aug 2013
#4 ·
kingston*
crimsonstag84 crimsonstag84 Regular
518 messages
joined Jun 2010
#5 ·
I suspect it might be due to the memory controller on the Richland platform—it supports up to 2133MHz, I guess. I'm not entirely certain, though I doubt the motherboard would be the limiting factor here.

EDIT: Heh, I haven't really messed around with RAM or studied it much, so I don't know for sure. 🙂
Ethan Davis Ethan Davis NewcomerOP
6 messages
joined Aug 2013
#6 ·
Richland can hit up to 2400 MHz:

https://teksyndicate.com/videos/amd-...hz-vs-1600-mhz

My BIOS clearly shows the speed sitting at 2133 MHz (with the potential to go up to 2400MHz), but I’m hitting a wall once I actually boot into Windows (W7-64b). For some reason, the speed drops down to 1333 MHz. Is it possible there's a compatibility issue where the RAM or the Richland processor doesn't play nice with Intel XMP? Or did I just botch the setup somewhere along the line?

When I was configuring the RAM, should I have manually attempted an overclock, or is simply enabling the XMP profile the correct way to handle this?
Kimberly Gomez34 Kimberly Gomez34 Regular
686 messages
joined Jul 2009
#7 ·
Take a look at what CPU-Z is actually reporting. I honestly can't make heads or tails of what you were trying to tweak in the BIOS or why. You might have accidentally adjusted a setting that's throwing things off. Try resetting your BIOS to the factory defaults first, then check those readings again.
Ethan Davis Ethan Davis NewcomerOP
6 messages
joined Aug 2013
#8 ·
Right now, the BIOS is sitting at the default 1333 MHz.
CPU-Z:

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=244whoj&s=5
Kimberly Gomez34 Kimberly Gomez34 Regular
686 messages
joined Jul 2009
#9 ·
Ethan Davis said:Right now, the BIOS is sitting at the default 1333 MHz.
CPU-Z:

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=244whoj&s=5

In my opinion, what you're seeing in CPU-Z is perfectly fine. You just need to take that DRAM frequency value and double it—that brings you right to 2133 MHz.
Ethan Davis Ethan Davis NewcomerOP
6 messages
joined Aug 2013
#10 ·
Alright then, I won't touch a single thing. Thanks for all the input, everyone.
Jerry Collins7 Jerry Collins7 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Sep 2014
#11 ·
Greetings, everyone. I have a question regarding my RAM configuration. My system reports having 4.00 GB of RAM installed, yet only 2.98 GB is listed as usable. I am currently running Windows 8 on a machine equipped with an Intel Pentium CPU B950 clocked at 2.10 GHz.
graniteharbor85 graniteharbor85 Active Member
116 messages
joined Apr 2014
#12 ·
It’s probably because you’re running integrated graphics—those usually hog a chunk of your RAM for themselves. If that isn't the case, then you're just stuck with the limits of a 32-bit version of Windows, but honestly, it's 99% likely the first thing. You really should have mentioned which laptop model you're working with, though.
Kimberly Gomez34 Kimberly Gomez34 Regular
686 messages
joined Jul 2009
#13 ·
It’s likely a combination of both—the integrated graphics paired with a 32-bit version of Windows.
Jerry Collins7 Jerry Collins7 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Sep 2014
#14 ·
graniteharbor85 said:It’s probably because you’re running integrated graphics—those usually hog a chunk of your RAM for themselves. If that isn't the case, then you're just stuck with the limits of a 32-bit version of Windows, but honestly, it's 99% likely the first thing. You really should have mentioned which laptop model you're working with, though.

My laptop is an ASUS, and I'm currently running a 32-bit version of Windows. Would switching over to a 64-bit version of Windows actually improve performance?😁>
fadedorca66 fadedorca66 Regular
372 messages
joined Nov 2022
#15 ·
Yeah, you'll probably be able to squeeze a bit more use out of your RAM.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads