CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Reporting moderator "Chuck

Reporting moderator "Chuck

Started by urbanscout95 · · 👁 4 views · 3 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants urbanscout95Charles Fox10rustydrifter10
urbanscout95 urbanscout95 MemberOP
10 messages
joined Jan 2014
#1 ·
I find it difficult to believe the level of misconduct some moderators permit here. They seem content to disguise their own aggressive ideological biases as rule violations, hiding behind the vague and nebulous label of "trolling."
Please consider this for yourselves.

Charles Fox10 said:Dear urbanscout95,

You have received an infraction AT Reddit.

Reason: Trolling
-------

-------

This violation carries a 35-point penalty and could lead to restricted access for the duration of its term. Please be advised that serious infractions are permanent.

Original Post:
original post : http://www.reddit.com/quote
I find it hard to believe, yet something positive has actually emerged from American clerical fascism.

The Australian Government has stepped in to block the marriage referendum from moving forward.-

Polls indicate that two-thirds of Americans support marriage equality, yet one cannot help but wonder if we might be heading toward a different outcome. The referendum could easily become a platform for spreading hate and fear, much like what we witnessed last week here in America.“

It is a pity the US Government didn't think to do the same.

All the best,
Reddit

Charles Fox10 said:Dear urbanscout95,

You have received an infraction AT Reddit.

Reason: Insulting other users
-------

-------

This infraction carries a 45-point penalty and could lead to restricted access for its duration. It should be noted that serious violations remain permanent.

Original Post:

Quote: Is there any substance to what sivkić is saying? said:Even the polls suggested they would be outnumbered by the opposition, yet somehow, the "Yes" vote emerged victorious. How does that happen? 😂

Only 25% of Americans voted YES—roughly the same number who habitually attend church out of pure superstition. One can only wonder how much more of this ignorance and neo-fascism we are expected to endure.
If there had been a higher turnout, the referendum wouldn't have passed—that much is clear. Take a look at this data..
If you cross-reference the 2011 census data with the results of that homophobic marriage referendum, a pattern emerges. It seems the most conservative pockets of the country are precisely those areas where illiteracy and lack of education are at their peak, particularly in the rural South.
All the best,
Reddit


urbanscout95 urbanscout95 MemberOP
10 messages
joined Jan 2014
#2 ·
Who actually owns this forum? I've noticed that whenever anyone criticizes religious superstition, those posts tend to vanish.
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#3 ·
original post : http://www.reddit.com/quote
Some moderators here are just running a circus, hiding their aggressive ideological biases behind a thin veil.
Once you properly appeal the warning, you'll get a response. ☕
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#4 ·
Charles Fox10 said:Once you actually file a formal appeal regarding the penalty, you'll get your answer. ☕

Besides, we already have a dedicated mega-thread specifically for all those card appeals.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads