CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Safety precautions

Safety precautions

Started by hiddenhound3 · · 👁 5 views · 9 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants hiddenhound3Casey Bennettcrimsonhawk23wiredseal7Linda Price5Christian Howard2
hiddenhound3 hiddenhound3 RegularOP
309 messages
joined Feb 2018
#1 ·
I am somewhat uncertain as to which forum would be most appropriate for this, though the content itself is quite significant.

The following information was forwarded to me from a pulmonologist at the Mayo Clinic, providing additional clarity regarding the nature of the virus, and I felt it prudent to share it here for your consideration:
Because of its physical properties, this virus is relatively large and heavy; consequently, it does not remain suspended in the air but rather settles on surfaces. It can persist on one's hands for approximately five to ten minutes, linger on clothing for several hours, and remain on metallic surfaces, such as door handles, for up to twelve hours.
Furthermore, the virus is sensitive to temperatures exceeding 73°F. Therefore, it is advisable to wash your hands with warm water, spend time in the sunlight, and ensure that clothing is laundered regularly. Due to its size, it does not pass easily through standard protective masks. A five to ten-minute window of persistence on the hands is a considerable amount of time, during which one might inadvertently touch one's nose, eyes, or mouth, or consume food. Thus, frequent washing with warm water is essential. Naturally, one should also avoid crowded areas and confined spaces.
Initially, the virus colonizes the nose and throat, causing a scratchy, irritating sensation. Crucially, it does not cause nasal secretion, which serves as a vital way to differentiate it from other viral infections. While the infection is present in the upper respiratory tract, one should consume warm liquids and warm water, while strictly avoiding cold beverages or ice. Gargling—perhaps using Betadine—is also recommended to prevent the virus from descending further. During this stage, you may experience a dry, irritated cough without any mucus. This phase typically lasts two to four days. To reiterate: the absence of nasal discharge is the key indicator.
After roughly five or six days, the virus may descend into the lungs. At that point, a fever often develops. A dry cough and shallow breathing are clear indications that the virus has reached the lungs.
Ultimately, our primary objective should be to prevent the virus from migrating to the lungs.
Maintaining a distance of more than ten feet from anyone who is infected is the safest course of action. Please share this with others.
Casey Bennett Casey Bennett Regular
522 messages
joined Nov 2011
#2 ·
I assume what you actually meant to say was:
It is resistant to temperatures below <23C

In other words, lower than, not higher than.
hiddenhound3 hiddenhound3 RegularOP
309 messages
joined Feb 2018
#3 ·
Casey Bennett said:I assume you intended to write "lower than" rather than "higher than."

I did not compose the message myself; I merely forwarded what was written. However, based on my own research online, the information provided in the previous post appears to be accurate. The virus is reportedly susceptible to temperatures exceeding 79 degrees Fahrenheit. Consequently, it is recommended that one washes their hands with warm water and exposes clothing—such as winter jackets or hats that aren't laundered daily—to direct sunlight. There is already speculation that the upcoming warmer weather will begin to gradually curb this menace.

Thank you for your attention 😉
crimsonhawk23 crimsonhawk23 Member
22 messages
joined Nov 2018
#4 ·
hiddenhound3 said:It’s apparently sensitive to temperatures above 23°C (about 73°F).

The human body temperature—where the virus actually lives—is obviously much higher than 23°C, so by that logic, the virus shouldn't even stand a chance inside us. And yet, somehow, it does.

I'm really not sure where this nonsense keeps coming from... 🤦
wiredseal7 wiredseal7 Regular
320 messages
joined Jan 2009
#5 ·
crimsonhawk23 said:The human body—where the virus actually lives—is way hotter than 23°C, so by that logic, it shouldn't even survive in us. But somehow, against all odds, it does.

I have no clue where this nonsense keeps coming from... 🤦

You've got it wrong—she specifically said it isn't resistant to higher temperatures!

Outside the host, it’s basically "crystallized" in its capsid, so heat just speeds up the processes that tear it apart.

Inside the body, the virus takes on a different form—its RNA is tucked inside cells, replicating away at standard body temperature.
crimsonhawk23 crimsonhawk23 Member
22 messages
joined Nov 2018
#6 ·
wiredseal7 said:I think you missed her point—she actually specified that it isn't resistant to higher temperatures.

So, how do we account for the virus existing and spreading in places where it's consistently over 73°F? For instance, Australia was seeing the tail end of summer until just a couple of weeks ago, and they currently have 300 cases.
Or maybe look at Malaysia (428), Qatar (337), or Bahrain (214)...?
wiredseal7 wiredseal7 Regular
320 messages
joined Jan 2009
#7 ·
crimsonhawk23 said:So how do you explain the virus spreading in places where it's consistently over 75°F? Like in Australia—where they just wrapped up their summer and now have 300 cases...
Or look at Malaysia (428), Qatar (337), or Bahrain (214).??

The risk of transmission seems lower in warmer climates—you can already see that trend playing out.

But it’s still there. People are infectious even without showing symptoms—enough to pass it to anyone standing too close. It doesn't even need to linger on surfaces for long to do its thing.
crimsonhawk23 crimsonhawk23 Member
22 messages
joined Nov 2018
#8 ·
Well, I suppose we'll just have to wait and see. 😁 I’d honestly love it if that theory about the warmer weather actually turned out to be true—if there's any silver lining to be found in all this, maybe it's just that everyone's personal hygiene levels might improve a bit, which certainly wouldn't be a bad thing.
Linda Price5 Linda Price5 Active Member
171 messages
joined May 2013
#9 ·
To isn't some official statement from a pulmonologist at Wells Fargo. If you want to see the actual breakdown regarding that claim, here is the article detailing the situation: https://factcheck.afp.com/health-exp...iZezqaptxSCnYY
Christian Howard2 Christian Howard2 Member
19 messages
joined Nov 2011
#10 ·
Look, I haven't been able to verify this, and there isn't even a single reliable link out there to back up this notice. So, honestly? I’m just staying quiet on this one.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads