CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Science Frontiers IV

Science Frontiers IV

Started by Elizabeth Cruz · · 👁 6 views · 6 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Elizabeth CruzCarol Lopez23Linda Moore51Noah DiazRyan Gomez4
Elizabeth Cruz Elizabeth Cruz NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Apr 2017
#1 ·
You don't have to look far to see this whole troll squad operating in one corner of the board. It’s all pretty obvious, especially with the moderator giving them their "blessing."
If the thread is actually considered irrelevant, then just shut it down instead of using it as a way to belittle other users.
Carol Lopez23 Carol Lopez23 Member
30 messages
joined Apr 2005
#2 ·
Everything is proceeding exactly according to the established plan. We have touched upon all these various points throughout this entire discussion thread, and I recall seeing certain perspectives being fervently defended, almost desperately so, across other sections of this document as well. You should certainly take a moment to reflect on the very arguments you previously put forward yourself.
Linda Moore51 Linda Moore51 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Mar 2017
#3 ·
Larry Sanchez30 said:You only have to take one look at that entire pack of trolls hanging out on this same sub-forum and everything becomes crystal clear, especially when you consider they’re all operating under the "blessing" of the moderator.
If you think this thread isn't worth anyone's time, then just shut it down already instead of using it as some kind of platform to look down on the people actually participating in this forum.

So, I was just sitting here thinking about how much of a mess things can get when you have a local archaeologist trying to be "creative" with their findings, and honestly, it’s enough to make my blood boil. You see it all the time in small-town America—someone thinks they’ve stumbled upon something groundbreaking, but really, they’re just rearranging the furniture of history to fit their own little narrative. It’s one thing to follow the science, but it’s another thing entirely to start treating historical sites like your own personal sandbox for "artistic interpretation." These so-called creative contributions from local digs are usually nothing more than a desperate attempt to make a boring patch of dirt look like the next big discovery, and frankly, it undermines everything serious researchers are actually doing out there in the field.
Larry Sanchez30 said:Psychology does a hell of a job explaining exactly how an individual’s moral compass just completely evaporates once they become part of a "herd." It’s actually a pretty simple conclusion if you bother to look at it—once you fall in line with a group, you stop acting on your own principles and start following whatever mindless set of rules that crowd has cooked up for itself.

Larry Sanchez30 said:Look, if a person refuses to ever change their mind, you’re looking at one of two extremes: they are either an absolute genius who has already figured out the fundamental truths of the universe, or they are a complete and utter moron. There isn't really any middle ground here.

I’ve been thinking about this lately, and honestly, it’s a simple mathematical truth applied to the human condition: a person is essentially nothing more than a fraction. You take who you actually are—your true character, your real actions, your actual substance—and that’s your numerator. Then you take how much you think of yourself, that massive, bloated ego, and that becomes your denominator. It’s basic arithmetic, really. The bigger that denominator gets, the smaller the actual value of the person becomes. If you walk around thinking you're the greatest thing since sliced bread, you're just shrinking your own worth until you're practically zero.

Larry Sanchez30 said:What is even the point of dragging out an argument over a theory you clearly don't believe in to begin with? Is this just some desperate attempt to play the intellectual heavyweight, or are you actually trying to prove something to us? It feels like you're just talking in circles for the sake of hearing your own voice.

Look, I’ve still got plenty more where that came from if anyone actually wants to see it, so if you need me to drop some links, just say the word and I'll get them posted. 😁
Noah Diaz Noah Diaz Active Member
114 messages
joined Sep 2021
#4 ·
Keith Gonzalez said:Everything is going exactly according to plan. We have already covered all of this in this thread, and some people have even gone to feverish lengths to defend these exact positions in other parts of that PDF. Just remember—you said the same thing yourself.

¸

And what exactly is this P.S.? Some private little inside joke of yours?

Speaking of the forum's rules, they've already been issued a second warning:

Everyone’s ignoring them. Now the trolls have just started bickering amongst themselves in these threads. It's completely pointless.
Ryan Gomez4 Ryan Gomez4 Active Member
112 messages
joined Feb 2013
#5 ·
I won't tolerate mindless spam, just like any other repeated rule-breaking on this forum. But I'm not handing out bans or deleting posts just because I—or anyone else—don't like them.
Noah Diaz Noah Diaz Active Member
114 messages
joined Sep 2021
#6 ·
What kind of actual value do those ignored trolls bring to any topic or discussion?

And when exactly do you plan on finally holding them accountable? ☕
Carol Lopez23 Carol Lopez23 Member
30 messages
joined Apr 2005
#7 ·
Noah Diaz said:¸

Which "PS" are we even talking about here? Is this some personal little grievance you've cooked up?

Speaking of the forum's rules and etiquette, those individuals have already been issued a second warning:

Since everyone chooses to look the other way, these trolls have simply begun engaging in mindless, circular chatter within the threads.

Nonsense should always be met with derision. However, the group you have placed on your ignore list is actually attempting to provide meaningful insight and clarity. It seems you have effectively stifled the conversation yourself by choosing to ignore perfectly coherent posts. That is hardly our concern to fix.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads