#1 ·
So, I was scrolling through some news online today—just a snippet of an article, really—about Scientology;
And they describe this pretty wild experience. It basically says how, within their whole teaching system, they just bleed members dry of money and time while pushing them into all sorts of activities. And right in the middle of all that, besides those supposed "self-help" courses, there's this idea that you can't just reveal massive religious secrets to someone all at once—because, apparently, it would just break them or something—so instead, they drip-feed the info as you "progress" through their specific path...
My takeaway is roughly that the entire setup is just a giant scheme to rake in cash. Since I haven't actually read much about Scientologists, I'm honestly pretty grateful for the heads-up that it's essentially just a way to claim they're helping people clear out past traumas. Now, since psychoanalysis and all those other fields have pointed out that addressing trauma is a huge deal, I guess I should look at this from a different angle. First off, the article frames the whole thing as just another "self-help" technique, which, to me, makes the entire situation feel kind of trivialized. Maybe the opposite conclusion is what we should draw here: anything that smells even remotely like "self-help" shouldn't be taken seriously. Like, I don't know, maybe just go see a psychiatrist and take the meds the scientists recommend instead of messing around with self-help nonsense...
But if we want to actually distinguish between genuine self-help, analyzing your own past, and all those various religious tricks, how would we even define what that looks like? Because, I mean, running off to visit gurus—whether they call themselves cults, religions, psychologists, psychiatrists, or even just support groups for alcoholism, drug addiction, or internet addiction—none of that really fits the bill, does it?
Real self-help starts with observation. But maybe it’s not exclusively about looking at your own past, or maybe it isn't even about that at all. What would self-help actually include, and more importantly, what would it leave out? Because, it feels like this whole thing is just an attempt to devalue what actually holds the most weight in spirituality...
And they describe this pretty wild experience. It basically says how, within their whole teaching system, they just bleed members dry of money and time while pushing them into all sorts of activities. And right in the middle of all that, besides those supposed "self-help" courses, there's this idea that you can't just reveal massive religious secrets to someone all at once—because, apparently, it would just break them or something—so instead, they drip-feed the info as you "progress" through their specific path...
My takeaway is roughly that the entire setup is just a giant scheme to rake in cash. Since I haven't actually read much about Scientologists, I'm honestly pretty grateful for the heads-up that it's essentially just a way to claim they're helping people clear out past traumas. Now, since psychoanalysis and all those other fields have pointed out that addressing trauma is a huge deal, I guess I should look at this from a different angle. First off, the article frames the whole thing as just another "self-help" technique, which, to me, makes the entire situation feel kind of trivialized. Maybe the opposite conclusion is what we should draw here: anything that smells even remotely like "self-help" shouldn't be taken seriously. Like, I don't know, maybe just go see a psychiatrist and take the meds the scientists recommend instead of messing around with self-help nonsense...
But if we want to actually distinguish between genuine self-help, analyzing your own past, and all those various religious tricks, how would we even define what that looks like? Because, I mean, running off to visit gurus—whether they call themselves cults, religions, psychologists, psychiatrists, or even just support groups for alcoholism, drug addiction, or internet addiction—none of that really fits the bill, does it?
Real self-help starts with observation. But maybe it’s not exclusively about looking at your own past, or maybe it isn't even about that at all. What would self-help actually include, and more importantly, what would it leave out? Because, it feels like this whole thing is just an attempt to devalue what actually holds the most weight in spirituality...