CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Slasher

Slasher

Started by Tyler Clark86 · · 👁 4 views · 13 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Tyler Clark86Elizabeth Rivera6silentcanyon58Jerry Martinez50Matthew Rodriguez9goldenscout14goldenskipper72
Tyler Clark86 Tyler Clark86 Active MemberOP
77 messages
joined Dec 2012
#1 ·
I mean, I’m sure you guys all know this horror subgenre by now.

But hey, if you don't, consider yourself officially caught up! 😁

The main reason I'm starting this thread—since there isn't one on this forum yet, which is honestly kind of a crime... I mean, someone more experienced than me probably should've stepped up sooner, but I just couldn't sit here anymore knowing we didn't have a dedicated "Slasher" topic going on. 😁 Also, I'm doing this because it's easily one of my favorite horror niches... I mean, the sheer amount of cult classics and iconic killers out there is insane... 😍
Anyway, enough rambling, let's get into it! Dive in, everyone! 🙂

Just a little intro here, some basic info to get us started.

A Slasher film is a subgenre of horror film, and at times thriller, typically involving a mysterious psychopathic killer stalking and killing a sequence of victims usually in a graphically violent manner, often with a cutting tool such as a knife or axe. Although the term "Slasher" may be used as a generic term for any horror movie involving graphic acts of murder, the Slasher as a genre has its own set of characteristics which set it apart from related genres like the splatter film.

If anyone wants to go down a rabbit hole and get way more detailed info on anything regarding the Slasher genre, you can always look it up on Wikipedia

Dropping a couple of images here just for the vibes. 🙂

image

image

image
Elizabeth Rivera6 Elizabeth Rivera6 Member
14 messages
joined May 2017
#2 ·
Hey everyone, just needed a break from that massive horror thread...
I honestly think the slasher is the best subgenre out there. It really hit its peak between the late seventies and early eighties. You can't talk about it without mentioning Carpenter and his masterpiece Halloween (1978), or even Friday the 13th (1980). That’s when things started getting commercialized, which I feel eventually led to the whole genre feeling cheap or even becoming a parody once we got to the Scream sequels...

That’s why those titles from the seventies and the first half of the eighties are total gems to me, despite their flaws. Most were low-budget flicks, but they had this specific atmosphere that modern movies—no matter how high the production value—just can't seem to replicate. They lack that raw, authentic vibe from the early days...
silentcanyon58 silentcanyon58 Active Member
74 messages
joined Sep 2011
#3 ·
I might be totally off base here, but contrary to what most people think, Psycho (1960) isn't actually the very first slasher ever put on film... the title of "the first" really belongs to Peeping Tom (1960), even if they both hit theaters in the same year. 🙂
Elizabeth Rivera6 Elizabeth Rivera6 Member
14 messages
joined May 2017
#4 ·
silentcanyon58 said:I might be totally off base here, but contrary to what most people think, Psycho (1960) isn't actually the very first slasher ever put on film... the title of "the first" really belongs to Peeping Tom (1960), even if they both hit theaters in the same year. 🙂


There are plenty of slasher vibes in older movies too, but most people point to Black Christmas (1974)
as the true first one by definition...
Jerry Martinez50 Jerry Martinez50 Active Member
74 messages
joined Jul 2010
#5 ·
Does anyone have any recommendations? I'm looking for something totally obscure. 😁
Elizabeth Rivera6 Elizabeth Rivera6 Member
14 messages
joined May 2017
#6 ·
Jerry Martinez50 said:Does anyone have any recommendations? I'm looking for something totally obscure. 😁

Happy Birthday to Me(1981) was the first one that popped into my head...😁
Jerry Martinez50 Jerry Martinez50 Active Member
74 messages
joined Jul 2010
#7 ·
Thanks so much! I haven't actually seen 🙂
Matthew Rodriguez9 Matthew Rodriguez9 Active Member
93 messages
joined Feb 2012
#8 ·
Elizabeth Rivera6 said:There are plenty of slasher vibes in older movies too, but most people point to Black Christmas (1974)
as the true first one by definition...


For me personally, I'd go with The Omen... thinking back to that 1976 release...
goldenscout14 goldenscout14 Active Member
68 messages
joined Nov 2011
#9 ·
It’s going to end up looking like every other mindless horror slasher on the market.
Tyler Clark86 Tyler Clark86 Active MemberOP
77 messages
joined Dec 2012
#10 ·
@Jerry Martinez50 drop those impressions here once you've checked it out. 🙂
Tyler Clark86 Tyler Clark86 Active MemberOP
77 messages
joined Dec 2012
#11 ·
Silent Night, Deadly Night

image

Spoiler alert!

So, it’s been like a month since I sat through this "cult classic" slasher, which means I’ve probably forgotten some details... but man, I definitely haven't forgotten how much it sucked.
Look, I don't have a problem with 80s flicks, low-budget horror, or cheesy special effects—that's half the fun—but here? Everything was just poorly done. For starters, the intro is super weird, the whole sequence showing him growing up is clunky, the kill effects are rough, the acting is... well, yeah. It’s all just bad and totally misses the mark. I gotta say, the actual concept is actually great, but they just blew the execution. You've got this Boy who watches Santa Claus murder his parents right in front of him, then the trauma from the group home sends him over the edge, and he starts hallucinating that he's Santa Claus coming to punish all the naughty kids... It takes until maybe the 40-minute mark before the killing even starts, and honestly, the way they handled it was so amateurish it was almost funny... I'm really hoping the remake manages to be better than this, at least in a few spots...
I’d give you guys a link to the full movie with subtitles on YouTube, but someone already nuked it. 🤣 Honestly, I should've just spent those 79 minutes staring at this cool poster instead.

3/10
Tyler Clark86 Tyler Clark86 Active MemberOP
77 messages
joined Dec 2012
#12 ·
So, I finally sat down to watch Return to Sleepaway Camp (2008), and man... where do I even start? It’s one of those movies that makes you wonder if the people behind it actually watched the original or if they just read a summary on Wikipedia or something. I mean, I guess I shouldn't be surprised, right? Everything feels a little bit off—just slightly out of sync with what made the first one work. It tries to tap into that nostalgia for the original Sleepaway Camp, but instead of feeling like a tribute, it kind of feels like a cheap imitation. Like, maybe it was trying to capture that specific vibe, but it just ends up feeling hollow. I don't know, maybe it's just me being cynical, but the whole thing felt a bit disjointed. The pacing is weird—it drags in some spots and then rushes through things that actually mattered—and honestly, it just lacks that certain spark. And don't even get me started on the characters. They aren't exactly deep, are they? Most of them feel like cardboard cutouts just moving from point A to point B so the plot can happen. It’s frustrating because there's potential there, I really think so, but it just doesn't land. It’s just... meh. Not exactly a masterpiece, that's for sure. Just a bit of a bummer, really.

image image

Maybe some spoilers...

It’s been way too long since I sat down to revisit the original trilogy, so I figured—I don't know, maybe it was just time—to finally dive into the third one. So, I was thinking about Sleepaway Camp again—yeah, I know, I can’t let it go—and man, that ending still gets me. It’s just one of those movies that stays in your brain, you know? Like, you think you’re watching a standard slasher flick, all the usual tropes and stuff, but then it hits you with that twist. It's wild. I guess I just love how it messes with your head right when you think you've got the whole thing figured out. Maybe it's just me being weird, but there's something about that specific kind of shock value that works so much better than the modern stuff we see now. Just... yeah. Anyway, what do you guys think? Is it a classic or am I just overthinking it? I've been meaning to sit down and binge this series for the longest time now. Honestly, I’m a huge fan of the first movie—it’s basically a total must-see if you're into slashers, so if that's your thing and you haven't checked it out yet, I'd definitely recommend it. I actually pretty much dig the sequels too, mostly because they're just fun... plus you get Angela and her whole weird camp rules and that specific little code she follows when she's out for blood—kind of reminds me of Dexter, I guess. 😁 I mean, come on—those old classics actually had guts, blood, and actual stakes... plus a killer soundtrack. This? This is just more proof that slashers totally went downhill after the 80s.

You can totally tell they were trying to chase that old-school 80s vibe from the first movie—you know, like that kitchen kill scene, bringing back three of the original cast members, all those similar camera angles and setups... it was clearly an attempt to recapture the magic. Did it actually work? Honestly, not really. I mean, maybe a few things clicked well enough to keep the whole thing from being a total disaster—like that final scene, for example—but overall? Not so much. The acting is just plain bad, super hard to believe, and the soundtrack is all over the place. The music hits at these weird moments when you don't even need a creepy atmosphere, and then when it *is* supposed to be scary, the music isn't even remotely creepy. That's why the intro... song What the hell?

What Hiltzik did with Angela in the first SP felt like he was trying to pull the exact same stunt here with Alan. I mean, everything was so painfully obvious that you could basically name the killer before the opening credits even finished—but damn, that ending totally flipped every single theory on its head. So, I guess that makes it feel different from the first SP, even if it still follows that same vibe. Honestly, Alan is just getting on my nerves at this point. Like, he’s the main guy, everything revolves around him, and yet he’s just... there. And don't even get me started on the jokes. They were so bad, just super cheesy, cringey dialogue everywhere. Plus, can we talk about how Alan doesn't change his shirt once during the entire movie? Even when it looks absolutely filthy, he’s wearing the same thing. It’s weird. I don't know what else to say... if there had been any actual boobs in this movie, I might've given it a better rating. Seriously. In the previous three films, they were everywhere, but here? Nothing. If they had just thrown in one or two scenes, I'd be more into it. This is honestly miles away from your average slasher where the rule is: Blood and boobs.Wait, so this is supposed to be a comedy-horror? I don't know about that—I really wouldn't say so. It’s missing those funny bits you actually got in the last two sequels, which is kind of why they even fall into that subgenre in the first place... but for RtSC? Yeah, I wouldn't call it that.

Man, this movie was pretty rough. It’s definitely below average, honestly—but I guess those kill scenes and the ending kind of pull it up just enough to make it feel like a legitimate third entry in the SP series. I don't get what Hiltzik was even doing sitting on this for so long, finally dropping it in 2008 when apparently the whole thing was wrapped up back in 2006. Wikipedia claims it was some hold-up with the CGI effects, but I don't see anything particularly impressive about the CGI here... though whatever, that's probably not even the main issue. Also, that after-credits scene with Angela? Way too intense. 😁

I mean, I guess Hiltzik works at...So, I was just thinking about that whole Sleepaway Camp reunion thing... honestly, it’s kind of wild how much time passes, right? I guess I was looking back at some old stuff and it just hit me. Maybe I'm just getting old or whatever, but man, some things just stick with you. Anyway, what do you guys think about the idea of everyone getting back together for a reunion like that? Is it actually cool or just super awkward? I don't know, I feel like half the people probably wouldn't even show up anyway. Just my two cents, I guess.I mean, I guess we could start talking about which ones should actually hit theaters sometime next year... maybe? Just some random thoughts, I suppose. 🙂

3.5/10
goldenskipper72 goldenskipper72 Member
21 messages
joined Jun 2013
#13 ·
I mostly watched The Burning because it was Jason Alexander's first big role. A killer with garden shears? Honestly, it was just okay.
Tyler Clark86 Tyler Clark86 Active MemberOP
77 messages
joined Dec 2012
#14 ·
Friday the 13th franchise topic.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register