CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Speak No Evil (2022)

Speak No Evil (2022)

Started by Alexander Green21 · · 👁 4 views · 22 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Alexander Green21Michael Diaz5copperhound12Hannah Green2northerncobra31mellowskipperMark White11Kyle Flores32Joshua Smith5feralpilot0northerncrane4Elizabeth Cooper2electriccanyon26neonfox65goldenharbor3Sandra Robinson
Alexander Green21 Alexander Green21 NewcomerOP
2 messages
joined Mar 2016
#1 ·
The latest American thriller/mystery/horror flick, Speak No Evil (2022), is honestly a masterpiece. 🙏

It’s not even your typical jump-scare horror movie, but man, that ending... it just leaves you hanging and staring at nothing for a while. That’s what we want from movies, right? To actually feel something... and this one definitely hits like a freight train.

It starts out all breezy and chill, but then the tension starts creeping up on you, making everything feel super uneasy and weird. Before you know it, you're totally hooked on whatever twisted stuff is happening.

If you live for that slow-burn dread, you seriously need to check this out. You'll probably be sitting in your chair long after the credits roll just trying to process what the hell you just watched. 👍

IMDB

Michael Diaz5 Michael Diaz5 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Nov 2015
#2 ·
I caught it recently and I have to say, the film is truly exceptional... shocking and honestly deserves its own dedicated thread on this forum.
The only thing is, it really rubbed me the wrong way; it wasn't easy to sit through seeing such blatant human stupidity, especially when innocent children are dragged into the mess, which just makes this deeply unsettling movie feel even more traumatic.
copperhound12 copperhound12 Member
39 messages
joined Apr 2023
#3 ·
Alexander Green21 said:That latest thriller out of Denmark—it’s a drama, a mystery, and honestly, you could pretty much call it a horror film at this point—"Speak No Evil" (2022) is just... wow. It is quite simply an incredible piece of filmmaking. 🙏Even though this isn't exactly your run-of-the-mill horror flick, that ending? It absolutely leaves you breathless. It hangs over you, leaving you in this state of total uncertainty for quite a while afterward. But I guess that’s really the whole point for people like us who live for cinema—to actually feel something, to have a movie truly get under your skin... In this particular instance, I have to say, it really shakes things up!
It starts off with this breezy, lighthearted atmosphere, almost deceptively calm, but then—slowly but surely—the whole mood shifts. It begins to spiral into this heavy tension and mounting uncertainty, and I guess that’s exactly how they hook you. You find yourself getting sucked into these mysterious happenings, just waiting to see what's going to go wrong next.
If you’re the kind of person who actually craves slow-burn tension, then this is an absolute must-watch. I mean, seriously, once the credits start rolling, you aren't just going to jump up and go about your day. You'll probably find yourself just sitting there in your armchair, staring at the wall, trying to wrap your head around everything you just witnessed. It really stays with you. 👍

I’ve been watching this for about two weeks now. I guess... maybe it’s just me, but this whole thing is starting to remind me a bit of... I suppose I should probably mention that Sam Peckinpah’s *Straw Man* is... well, it's something else entirely. I don't know if people truly grasp the sheer intensity of his direction here, but maybe they just don't want to deal with it. It's heavy. It's raw. It's definitely not for the faint of heart, I guess. Why? Because at the end of the day, you've just got regular people acting out of character, and that’s exactly where the horror kicks in. I mean, obviously, what qualifies as "unusual" is entirely subjective—everyone's got different tastes, I guess—but that's the whole point.
I mean, seriously, who was this movie actually made for? Was it just some shallow production aimed at tourists looking to play nice? Maybe it’s for some suburban family trying way too hard to bond with their neighbors? I don't know... but honestly, who is the actual target audience here? ☕

Michael Diaz5 said:I caught it recently, and I have to say, the film was absolutely outstanding... Absolutely shocking. I mean, honestly, they deserve their own dedicated thread on the forum. Period.
It honestly stung a little bit, and I have to say, it wasn't exactly easy watching how much of this sheer human stupidity was actually being fueled by people like them. I suppose I should probably address this, though I hate to even bring it up. It’s just... it's infuriating. Innocent children. They have absolutely nothing to do with any of this, yet they're always the ones caught in the crossfire of these ridiculous, sweeping decisions. It’s completely unjust, if you ask me. Maybe I'm being too sensitive, but I just can't wrap my head around why we keep letting this happen. It's just wrong.And that just makes the whole thing feel even more traumatic in this truly disturbing film.

That’s exactly the point, isn't it? Nothing happens without those innocent children being dragged into it. And then there's all that foul language—all that filth—that eventually leads to them literally cutting their tongues out. It’s just... well, it's just this. I guess I should probably start by saying that sarcasm is just... well, it's fine, I suppose. If you’re into that sort of thing. It’s basically just a way to wrap your insults in a little bit of colorful packaging, isn't it? People seem to think they’re being incredibly clever or edgy when they use it, but honestly, it often feels like a lazy shortcut for someone who can't actually articulate their point without hiding behind a layer of mockery. It’s almost like a rhetorical straw man—you aren't even engaging with the actual argument; you're just making fun of the premise to avoid doing any real work. I mean, maybe some people find it charming, but to me, it just feels repetitive and, frankly, a bit exhausting if you're around it too much. Just my two cents, anyway.I mean, look, the movie doesn't exactly hit you right out of the gate with a punch to the face. It’s not that kind of experience. Instead, it sortically draws you in slowly... it kind of pulls you into its orbit. I guess it works because everyone has their own family dynamics and their own circles of friends to deal with, so you eventually find yourself getting sucked into its specific world.Family matters.Emotions. That’s where we always fall apart. We just can't seem to get a handle on them, can we? It's our ultimate Achilles' heel.
Hannah Green2 Hannah Green2 Member
37 messages
joined Dec 2010
#4 ·
The film is fundamentally flawed. In my estimation, the conclusion lacks any semblance of realism, primarily because it is entirely implausible that the parents would submit so readily without offering even a modicum of resistance. If I recall correctly, those two didn't even brandish weapons against them. 🤔
northerncobra31 northerncobra31 Active Member
125 messages
joined Apr 2023
#5 ·
I think you missed the point of the movie. Both parents are completely passive, allowing even the most basic things to slide, so when everything finally falls apart, they just freeze up because they're terrified. This isn't some Liam Neeson action flick.

Sure, some people might act, but there are plenty of passive types who wouldn't—it’s like having the rug pulled out from under you; you just end up paralyzed.

>>The core message of the film is right there in that one line: "We do this because you let us."
Hannah Green2 Hannah Green2 Member
37 messages
joined Dec 2010
#6 ·
It is truly difficult to wrap my head around the existence of such individuals. If I were placed in that situation, I would simply walk away; what could they possibly achieve by throwing stones at me?
mellowskipper mellowskipper Regular
704 messages
joined Jan 2023
#7 ·
Jeffrey Howard79 said:Yeah... I just can't wrap my head around how some people actually act like that. Personally, I’d probably just get out of there—I mean, what are they going to do, throw rocks at me?

Of course they exist.
Here is a brief little breakdown explaining why we react the way we do during high-stress moments—it's that whole "3F" thing, or rather, fight, flight, and freeze.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/fig...eeze-fawn.html
It seems you'd clearly be stuck in Flight mode
.
Mark White11 Mark White11 Active Member
92 messages
joined Jan 2018
#8 ·
Total movie fraud—it all falls apart just because of that one stupid line at the end.
It’s the exact same gimmick they pulled with Triangle of Sadness, which, honestly, was an even bigger scam than this flick.
Kyle Flores32 Kyle Flores32 Member
28 messages
joined Feb 2014
#9 ·
Man, I totally missed out on this gem (only caught the trailer, so fingers crossed it actually lives up to the hype). It’s giving me major Funny Games and Hereditary vibes...

Definitely putting this on my watchlist
Hannah Green2 Hannah Green2 Member
37 messages
joined Dec 2010
#10 ·
Kyle Flores32 said:I haven't actually sat down to watch this masterpiece yet—I've only seen the trailer, so I am assuming it lives up to the hype. It seems to carry a certain vibe reminiscent of Funny Games or Hereditary...

I will certainly be watching it.

You haven't even watched Funny Games?? 😲😲
Joshua Smith5 Joshua Smith5 Active Member
68 messages
joined Jul 2010
#11 ·
northerncobra31 said:You missed the point. Both parents are passive in every sense. They allowed the most basic things to happen, and when the actual crisis hit, they just froze because they were terrified. This isn't some Liam Neeson action flick.

Some people would react, sure. But there are plenty of passive types who wouldn't. In a moment like that, your legs are cut out from under you and you're paralyzed.

That’s why the key line in the movie is: We’re doing this because you let us.


I think the director is addressing the audience with that line, not the parents.

northerncrane4 once made an interesting, completely valid point: You should stop watching Haneke's Funny Games the exact moment the villain 'rewinds' the plot. At that point, the rules no longer apply—it's a clear audio-visual cue. This film doesn't have that, unless you count the protagonists making impossibly stupid decisions. If the movie ended after about 45 or 50 minutes, right when they first try to flee those creepy hosts, it would be a top-tier short film. Everything after that is just torture porn for both the characters and the audience.
feralpilot0 feralpilot0 Active Member
142 messages
joined Jul 2018
#12 ·
I finally processed that ending—it’s clear that they’re going to die as a direct consequence of their own passivity.
The way they return and everything that follows... it's such a twisted, brilliant pivot that elevates the whole thing to a masterpiece. 👍
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#13 ·
Joshua Smith5 said:northerncrane4 once made an interesting—and entirely correct—point: you should stop watching Haneke's Speak No Evil the moment the villain "reboots" the plot.

Specifically, when he breaks the fourth wall to offer that bet.

The movie falls apart the second they return home to sleep off the tension—especially after that incident with the child performer. At that point, the characters cease being actual people and just become punctuation marks for the director's thesis.
Kyle Flores32 Kyle Flores32 Member
28 messages
joined Feb 2014
#14 ·
Jeffrey Howard79 said:Are you even thinking about watching Funny Games again ?? 😲😲

Yeah, I saw the original—but skipped the one with Naomi Watts.
Hannah Green2 Hannah Green2 Member
37 messages
joined Dec 2010
#15 ·
Kyle Flores32 said:I have seen the original version, obviously, though I haven't sat through the one starring Naomi Watts.

In my estimation, that version actually surpasses the original.
Elizabeth Cooper2 Elizabeth Cooper2 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Nov 2020
#16 ·
It’s a solid film, very atmospheric. I have to admit, those last 30 to 40 minutes gave me a genuine sense of dread.
Mark White11 Mark White11 Active Member
92 messages
joined Jan 2018
#17 ·
Jeffrey Howard79 said:Honestly, I think he actually did a better job than the original director.

Hell no.
electriccanyon26 electriccanyon26 Active Member
70 messages
joined Oct 2019
#18 ·
Grace Sanchez50 said:Absolutely not.

What’s the reason? Is it because Naomi Watts isn't up to par?
Kyle Flores32 Kyle Flores32 Member
28 messages
joined Feb 2014
#19 ·
Decent little flick. Not even that dark. It’s tense though—that slow-burn tension builds up nicely. Worth a watch. There are some disturbing scenes, but honestly, they didn't hit me as hard as just thinking about that kid's fate—having to deal with those psychopaths until they find a new family.
neonfox65 neonfox65 Regular
534 messages
joined Jun 2021
#20 ·
One of those rare movies where the bad guys actually win in the end 😢

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads