Thanks for deleting my posts

I certainly grasp your frantic efforts to scrub the record by deleting the vast majority of my contributions regarding the President of the United States. However, I find myself questioning what drives an individual to defend falsehoods and actively facilitate the decline of this nation.

While I acknowledge that this is a private forum, morality remains a deeply personal matter.
By removing my posts, you are effectively withholding information from others. Almost every one of my entries contained links; if there were any integrity left here, those truths would be easily verifiable through previous discussions or direct rebuttals, rather than just targeting my specific words in some sort of intellectual skirmish. Attempting to resort to *ad hominem* attacks will only result in something tragically absurd; they repeatedly attempt to insult me with fabrications, only to be met with nothing but the unvarnished truth.

Whether an answer is provided... or simply withheld... is an equally valid, albeit expected, choice. 😁

This inquiry isn't merely directed at you; there are those who haven't even caught up yet, continuing to spout nonsense on this thread in the meantime.
To be clear, I am not opposing the deletion of content—that is your prerogative. What concerns me is the moral dimension of this situation, which, in my estimation, has sunk to the level of the ocean floor. And frankly, you are far too grown up for such behavior.

You aren't funny. Your posts are becoming increasingly unreadable; they either get deleted or just buried. Right now, they're being deleted, but that won't last forever.

Thank you, sir. It isn’t mere courtesy; I was under the impression that one was required to be entertaining here. Though, given the abundance of clowns currently performing in this circus, my failure to amuse is perhaps my own fault, even if I find the whole spectacle quite tedious myself.
The reality of the situation remains unchanged, though it does strike me as somewhat peculiar that the President would publicly reiterate within a matter of days exactly what you have seen fit to delete,
especially when I have meticulously included links that substantiate my position.
Should those links be missing—given they merely serve to document the absurd personal outbursts of my opponents—their veracity is easily verified. If they are removed, I suspect the fallout will be even less amusing for everyone involved once the surviving evidence comes to light.
You yourself can attest to the nonsense being peddled. Character is an innate quality; one is born with it, and it rarely fluctuates.
However, I maintain that your assessment is flawed, with the exception of the moderators and super-moderators, as the data suggests a pattern of arbitrary deletions following a mathematical model of three removals for every one allowed.
Furthermore, those who find this lack of entertainment problematic are generally incapable of reading comprehension, a fact I am certain you have observed.
Truth is the most unsightly thing in existence , provided one lacks the fortitude to accept it.
It provides no amusement to the illiterate, which is yet another objective truth.
I appreciate your response and your time. My respect for your diligent execution of your duties remains steadfast.
"dr. house" - bodyhalleck, feel free to lock this thread into isolation if the critics have nothing left to contribute, or if some amateur art critic decides to weigh in. I certainly hope mine isn't the final word.