CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Formula 1 › The Iceman... seriously?

The Iceman... seriously?

Started by Carol Ortiz4 · · 👁 3 views · 14 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Carol Ortiz4boldhound8Betty MurphyBradley Ramirez5Charles Martin78
Carol Ortiz4 Carol Ortiz4 Active MemberOP
57 messages
joined Sep 2003
#1 ·
"Per The New York Times, Hans-Ulrich Maik, the managing director of Ilmor, the Mercedes-owned company that manufactures The team's engines, is being cast as the 'scapegoat' for what has been a truly dismal start to the season.

Such is The sense of frustration mounting AT Mclaren that The newspaper even reckons that , rather Than nurse his sick Engine during The early stages of The Bahrain GP, Kimi Raikkonen decided to hammer the throttle—essentially 'pumping fuel onto a fire'—just to see if he could coax that Mercedes-Benz V10 to erupt in a spectacular blaze right behind him.

I suppose that’s the end of us calling Kimi Raikkonen 'The Iceman,' isn't it?
"


It seems our 'Iceman' isn't quite as cool-headed as we thought... I still remember back in Malaysia when he lost his temper and took out that official just because he happened to be standing in the wrong spot. To be fair, you have to sympathize with him a little... dealing with three or four blown engines... anyone would be losing their mind at the manufacturer.

But there is a curious point here... why didn't David experience engine failures nearly as often? Perhaps young Kimi Raikkonen hasn't quite mastered the art of shifting gears yet?
😁 😁 😁 😁

Maybe the FIA should consider adding a footnote to the automatic transmission regulations specifically for those 'junior drivers' who haven't quite learned how to handle them properly.

And here is another bit of news:
"BAR's latest aero development - designed by Technical Director Geoff Willis, who was lured to the team from Williams three years ago - has been deemed illegal by the FIA. They judged it to include an illegal 'third element'."

It looks like Williams might have been feeling a bit intimidated by BAR... if this had been a case involving Ferrari and those tire issues from last season, people would be shouting about Ferrari not playing fair, but since it's this situation, everyone seems perfectly fine with it.🙄 🙄

That is all from me for now... heading off to Imola...
(Looking back at the results after Imola... Michael Schumacher had 4 pole positions and 4 wins)

Forza Ferrari!!!
boldhound8 boldhound8 Regular
437 messages
joined Oct 2007
#2 ·
Carol Ortiz4 says:

That's all from me... heading out to Monza...
(the stats after Monza.... M. Schumacher has 4 pole positions and 4 wins)

Forza Ferrari!!!

The standings after Interlagos, Brazil😁
M. Schumacher: 18 poles, 18 wins😁 😁 😁 😁 😁 😁
Ferrari rules🙏

FJBG
Mr.Ex.President😁
Betty Murphy Betty Murphy Active Member
145 messages
joined Apr 2003
#3 ·
McLaren is going to take the championship. We all go through those rough patches—just look back at how Ferrari struggled in the late 80s and early 90s; nobody was out here attacking the red jerseys back then!😁
Betty Murphy Betty Murphy Active Member
145 messages
joined Apr 2003
#4 ·
Mr.Ex. President said:The results following Interlagos, Brazil😁
Michael Schumacher: 18 poles, 18 wins😁 😁 😁 😁 😁 😁
Forza Ferrari🙏

FJBG
Mr.Ex.President😁

It’s easy to be a champion when the FIA tailors every single rule to suit Ferrari. If you look back at the last decade and their decision-making, they're finally feeling the sting because of the exact results you just laid out above.
Bradley Ramirez5 Bradley Ramirez5 Member
45 messages
joined Feb 2007
#5 ·
Anđeo said:It’s a walk in the park being a champion when the FIA keeps bending every rule to suit Ferrari—just look back at the last decade and their track record of decisions. Now they're finally feeling the consequences because they ended up with the exact result you mentioned above.

I have to agree with him—now that we can't seem to knock them off the top spot, they'll just start inventing some new set of regulations to stay ahead. As far as I'm concerned, F1 might as well just collapse; honestly, the sport has become incredibly predictable anyway.
boldhound8 boldhound8 Regular
437 messages
joined Oct 2007
#6 ·
Anđeo said:McLaren is gonna take the title. Everyone goes through rough patches—just look at Ferrari back in the late 80s and early 90s. Nobody was out here screaming at the red shirts back then, were they?😁

Look, I’ve stuck with Ferrari through the wins and the absolute disasters, and I’m sticking with them now. I’ll be right there riding with them even if we don't pull in a single point for the next ten years.

FJBG
Mr.Ex.President😁
boldhound8 boldhound8 Regular
437 messages
joined Oct 2007
#7 ·
Anđeo said:It’s easy being a champion when the FIA just bends every single rule to suit Ferrari. Just look at the last 10 years and their constant decisions—now they're finally eating crow because they ended up with the result you laid out above.

Which😕 prosvjetliti ja FJBG mr. ex😕

FJBG
Mr.Ex.President😁
Betty Murphy Betty Murphy Active Member
145 messages
joined Apr 2003
#8 ·
Mr.Ex. President said:I followed Ferrari when they were losing, I follow them now, and I’ll keep following them even if they don't score a single point for the next ten years.

FJBG
Mr.Ex.President😁

I'll say it again: nobody in America back in the early 90s ever went looking for trouble with the red side, and that's just the truth!😁

As for those points, I honestly believe they'll be winning them even when cars are running on alternative fuels.😁
Betty Murphy Betty Murphy Active Member
145 messages
joined Apr 2003
#9 ·
mr. ex said:Could😕 mr. ex enlighten me😕

FJBG
mr. ex😁

Bog says:
Let there be darkness, and let there be darkness!
Let there be light, and let there be light!

Honestly, it feels like everyone has been penalized at some point, yet they always seem to find some convenient excuse for Schumacher. Remember that incident from a few seasons back when they pushed him back onto the track just because "his engine hadn't stalled"? That was unheard of, both before and after!
As for the regulations, as soon as Mercedes showed total dominance back in 1998, they banned the exact materials they relied on most for their engine builds. If you look closely, none of these rules—whether it's limiting a driver to one qualifying lap or forcing them to use a single engine all weekend—actually hurt Michael Schumacher; if anything, they play right into Ferrari's hands!
Charles Martin78 Charles Martin78 Active Member
101 messages
joined Mar 2011
#10 ·
Carol Ortiz4 said:That’s all from me... until we hit Imole...

I'm going to hold you to that.😁
boldhound8 boldhound8 Regular
437 messages
joined Oct 2007
#11 ·
Anđeo said:Bog says:
Let there be night and let there be night!
Let there be light and let there be light!

Man, they’ve penalized everyone, but they always seem to find some way to give Schumacher a pass with these soft excuses. Remember that ridiculous stunt a few seasons back when they shoved him back onto the track just because "his engine hadn't stalled"? That kind of thing has never happened before and it hasn't happened since!!
And as for the regulations? The second Mercedes showed they were dominant back in '98, they went and banned the exact material they relied on most for their engines. All these rules—whether it's a single qualifying lap rule against M. Schumacher or limiting them to one engine for the whole weekend—honestly, none of this actually helps Ferrari! It's all working in their favor!

From what you're saying, it sounds like Ferrari didn't actually build anything great; it's more like the FIA just turned them into a powerhouse.😕
And that ban on beryllium (I think that's the name) wasn't some gift to Ferrari—it was a direct hit against McLaren.

FJBG
Mr.Ex.President😁
boldhound8 boldhound8 Regular
437 messages
joined Oct 2007
#12 ·
Anđeo said:I’m telling you, nobody in America,back in the early 90s,was sucking up to the red establishment, and that’s just the truth!😁

Don't you dare compare one set of reds to another.😁

FJBG
Mr.Ex.President😁
Betty Murphy Betty Murphy Active Member
145 messages
joined Apr 2003
#13 ·
mr. ex said:Don't you dare compare one red car to anotherred one 😁

FJBG
mr. ex😁

You nailed it!👍 😁
Betty Murphy Betty Murphy Active Member
145 messages
joined Apr 2003
#14 ·
Mr.Ex. President said:From your perspective, it seems like Ferrari didn't actually build anything significant, and that the FIA just turned them into a powerhouse.😕
As for that beryllium ban—in my view, that wasn't an advantage for Ferrari, but rather a move aimed directly at McLaren.

FJBG
Mr.Ex.President😁

Not quite. Back then, Ferrari signed the most promising driver on the planet, world champion Michael Schumacher. Between his sheer talent and the support of a phenomenal team of engineers, designers, and mechanics, he truly brought Ferrari back to the top. Don't be confused!😁
It’s true, they did have an edge over McLaren 🙂, though I've always wondered why Bernie Ecclestone seems to have such a grudge against them.
😕
Betty Murphy Betty Murphy Active Member
145 messages
joined Apr 2003
#15 ·
Elvis Presley said:I'm holding you to that.😁

Just like everyone else.😁

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads