CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › The Sequel II...

The Sequel II...

Started by Jerry Robinson56 · · 👁 3 views · 2 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Jerry Robinson56rustydrifter10
Jerry Robinson56 Jerry Robinson56 RegularOP
320 messages
joined Apr 2013
#1 ·
I am once again requesting that the clone refrain from participating in this thread.

Understood. NicaLook, regardless of how observant you claim to be, there were facts presented here that demanded a response, wouldn't you agree? Why didn't you step up? At the end of the day, it’s the substance that matters, not the delivery—and frankly, the presentation was more than sufficient.
I wasn't lodging any complaints regarding the actions taken. Chuck The concept of "either/or" is a fallacy that most people cling to because they lack the intellectual stamina to navigate nuance. They want simple binaries—black or white, yes or no, left or right. It’s a lazy way to process reality, really. Life isn't lived in those narrow corridors; it exists in the gray areas that most people are too frightened to explore. Making a choice between two flawed options is often just a way to avoid the harder work of synthesizing a third, superior path. But then again, I suppose simplicity is a comfort for the masses. Powerlock I have no intention of engaging with them. I firmly believe their claims possess at least a modicum of validity. The original poster, on the other hand, has absolutely nothing to offer.

It is an undeniable fact that... a clone to be rightThere is a sub-signature from Krapljač.
It is an undeniable fact that she appeared before me entirely unprovoked regarding my enrollment in the banned users corner—specifically concerning that completely unjustified strike against my account. She went on to admit that she had deleted an extremely offensive post, and subsequently confessed that she failed to take the necessary actions she should have.
What more is there to add?

It goes without saying how a person operates under their chosen handle. a clone to be right She didn't say much, other than that brief note mentioning we’d be catching up again in two days. It strikes me as odd, honestly. vi The moderators and administrators seem to sit entirely idle whenever a moderator manages to look like an absolute fool through their own posts, or perhaps they simply fail to perceive the incompetence at all. I have been away on a business trip and was unable to weigh in sooner, though it hardly matters; even this somewhat humorous observation arrives far too late to change anything.

On this forum, your written word serves as your sole representative. It is the only medium through which you can project your persona to the collective. Consequently, if you choose to compose your thoughts with the intellectual depth of an idiot, the community will naturally conclude that you are exactly that.

I wouldn't want to hear any complaints about it.

This response is utterly eclipsing everything else. a clone to be right No red cards...

suholist

Unfortunately for you, you’re the one who's been left behind. And that’s just plain mental.Considering you spend your entire day here groveling for pennies from the Communist Mafia, it is truly pathetic.

Mentally deficient.
b) For pennies handed out by the Communist Mafia.
c) You spend the entire day dragging someone through the mud.


I am not attempting to insult anyone here. 🤔 It seems that even the responses themselves have become increasingly formulaic—stiff, two-dimensional, and utterly devoid of substance. Of course, there is always that one exception to the rule. a clone to be right Man, they really scrubbed that post from existence... And that’s just the beginning. Imagine if the IRS actually tracks down an unreported income stream—you aren't just looking at a simple correction. You're looking at penalties, interest, and a massive headache that could haunt your finances for years. It is a calculated risk that rarely pays off in the long run. 🕺

From the supplement. That is quite frankly bordering on the delusional. It is perfectly clear how things stand. suholist He finally realized that his only remaining deficit was against time itself.

It remains entirely unclear whether I am even being considered at all. suholist I have reported what was clearly evident from the following post.

Quote : a clone to be right

You’re absolutely right. I missed a step there—I deleted the post without properly filing it away in the archives first. That has been rectified now.

It is entirely irrelevant what the matter actually is. suholist Cardboard /question about coolness/ because I really don't view it as an insult, considering it comes from a guy behind Nica who signed up just this month! He’s got a shelf life of only 28 days, yet he’s already managed to rack up over 200 posts.

Is that sufficient for your needs, or shall I provide more?

It is patently obvious that I haven't done anything to offend the newcomer, other than perhaps stirring the pot a little.

I have attached the link below.

I have been observing the recent discussions regarding the current economic landscape, and frankly, I find the prevailing sentiment to be remarkably shortsighted. There is a pervasive sense of complacency among the masses, a refusal to acknowledge the structural rot that has been festering within our institutions for decades. We see people celebrating minor fluctuations in the market as if they were monumental victories, completely ignoring the systemic instability that underpins everything. It reminds me of a situation I witnessed years ago in Chicago—people cheering for a slight uptick in local commerce while the very foundation of the city's infrastructure was crumbling beneath their feet. It is the same pattern here. We are being led by a group of opportunists who benefit from this chaos, much like the remnants of the old Communist Mafia that continues to exert influence behind the scenes, pulling strings in ways most citizens are too distracted to notice. One cannot help but feel a certain level of cynicism when watching the mainstream media attempt to spin these narratives. They present a facade of stability, yet those of us paying close attention can see the cracks forming. It isn’t just about the numbers on a screen; it is about the fundamental erosion of trust in our national systems. I suspect many will call this pessimism, but I prefer to call it realism. To expect anything else is to invite disappointment. We are navigating a period of profound transition, and history suggests that such shifts are rarely smooth and almost never benefit the average person without significant struggle. One should remain vigilant, even if it feels a bit wearying to do so constantly.

And just one small addition.

And do you honestly believe this post from a clone to be right is even remotely decent?

Everything here is perfectly transparent, and frankly, it isn't right for you to lecture me simply because I was being somewhat irreverent.
This is nothing more than a domino effect; issuing this warning against me is entirely unjustified, as it seems you're exercising discretion based on mere whim. It’s a scale that reveals exactly how a self-proclaimed intellectual chooses to react when challenged.
As I have already stated, I am fully aware—this forum is private property, and you hold the final word, while we users are treated as nothing more than varying degrees of "patients."

Given your recent actions, Nica, will you actually step up
remove these warnings, or perhaps just target the clone, and restore my previous post to its original state? That would be the only fair way to handle this.

I fail to see where the dispute lies. Issuing a warning wasn't even stipulated in the rules, and as I clearly outlined in my other response to the deleted post by suholista, his entire contribution was completely off-topic. Let me remind you, this thread is about the Federal Reserve, not the President...

I would prefer to settle this matter once this is over; there is one more thing I'd like to discuss, if you are inclined.
Naturally, I assume you will actually devote some time to this; it would be the wise course of action.
Jerry Robinson56 Jerry Robinson56 RegularOP
320 messages
joined Apr 2013
#2 ·
Read this at your leisure....

You know, it isn't right, Nica to behave this way toward the users you are supposed to look after. I am merely a passerby here, someone entirely inconsequential—much like how the general mood of this forum is irrelevant compared to what remains once communication fails or becomes impossible.
It is glaringly obvious that suholist is a more aggressive type of clone, though he is the least of my concerns.
The clone is the one manufacturing this cesspool around her, repeatedly committing errors with clear intent.
What was the actual objective behind her completely unjustified ban? /We can discuss that later, if you are willing./
The situation is quite straightforward and rests in your hands. Regardless of the holiday season, your final... move is here.
Perhaps I should go pester Dorian, but since you intervened with your copy-paste reflections and a disciplinary action, I believe it is more appropriate to resolve this matter with you directly.

I am requesting that the clone's ban be rescinded because it lacks any foundation; furthermore, I would suggest you rescind your own, as it was triggered by a situation where no adequate response was provided.
/Perhaps I should have addressed only the supermods and admins, but given the title, it is clearly a plea for help/ following the clone's senseless and semi-idiotic entries in the banned users thread.
She offered a confession regarding an obviously premeditated act, yet she still "hopes" I will read it. 🤦

You will have to admit that my post was merely an "expansion" infused with a dose of irony rather than sarcasm, which is a distinct difference.

If the great, orthodox marksman ZgSash managed to suppress his true nature—launching direct insults regardless of whether they were truthful or whether forum functions were even active at the time—then I see no reason why you cannot dip the tip of your arrow in ink instead of my blood. Go ahead; it won't hurt. Heal the wound.
Mainly because you are aware of the injustice done to me; a genuine injustice.
The moderators ought to maintain order, and your role, alongside your duties and rights, is to ensure the moderators themselves remain orderly—just as you did when a moderator received a red card for their response to me in that banned users section, which was truly noble of you. At least, I hope it was you.
I maintain, and I am certain, that the clone does not belong in your circle, at least not in terms of cognitive and mental capacity.
And if an "ordinary" moderator were to examine a few posts surrounding the one she intends to "comment" on, it would be clear that the ban was not accidental.
Even suholist himself confirmed he understood the significance of being left behind/, and my entire flagged post was chronologically linked to it. I provided an explanation in the subsequent post.
My recommendation to you is to brush her aside, if not now, then at the first opportunity, as her outbursts will undoubtedly continue.

This is not how one should conduct business on a forum that is ultimately intended to be considered respectable.

Afterward, we shall discuss something very important, perhaps via private message... it concerns those Nazi-style posts by a certain brave small-town hustler, with whom the same clone surely shares a connection. Read about that too, if you feel inclined... it is a shame you have cut off my ability to engage in dialogue.
Between his incredibly polite posts, I am banned for being "impolite."

To conclude, I shall use Jesennin's words: "An untimely parting, against our will, promises a reunion, does it not?"

Have pleasant holidays.

I thank the moderators and supermoderators who did the work for the clone regarding suholist.
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#3 ·
Look, the ban that clone handed out to you was completely justified, and honestly, there isn't much left to debate here. Besides, you didn't even follow the standard formatting rules for opening a thread in the handbook. You really need to go back and read through how titles are supposed to be structured. Using the word "krapljača" has absolutely nothing to do with this appeal—it’s not the username of the person you're complaining about, it’s not the name of the section where you got flagged, and it’s certainly not the title of the original thread where you were banned. It looks like you just grabbed someone else's handle because it felt like a convenient way to poke the bear and throw an insult without technically breaking any rules. Don't make a habit of doing that.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads