CheckEmoji Community Β· the emoji forum
🏠 Home πŸ†• What's new ❓ Unanswered πŸ”₯ Popular πŸ“‘ RSS Members πŸ‘₯ 0 online log in Β· register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Vogue...

Vogue...

Started by redhawk76 · · πŸ‘ 5 views · 6 replies

πŸ“‘ Subscribe to replies

Participants redhawk76granitefox16feraltrucker5boldhound8
redhawk76 redhawk76 Active MemberOP
60 messages
joined May 2013
#1 ·
The thread on the Vogue forum is titled Where and what kind of boots should I buy for this winter... I click on the first page, only to find πŸ˜²β€”the discussion kicks off with posts from 2007!!!!!!!!!!!

Then it’s just endless pages of comments and questions or answers about where to pick up specific styles... back in 2007, then moving on to 2008.... πŸ™„

Can someone explain the logic behind keeping posts from two years ago in a thread that explicitly uses "this year" in the title? Especially when there is never a shortage of fresh content every season, and frankly, anything from two years ago is completely out of style by now.
Why aren't these threads "cleaned up" to remove old, useless clutter?
granitefox16 granitefox16 Active Member
136 messages
joined Jun 2024
#2 ·
😲

Did you seriously have to scroll all the way back to 2009? 😲

Screw that CDC epidemic... 😒
redhawk76 redhawk76 Active MemberOP
60 messages
joined May 2013
#3 ·
granitefox16 said:...Screw the CDC epidemic😒

Well, I find myself in agreement... 🀷 (though that's precisely why football remains such a vital distraction...πŸ˜‰)
granitefox16 granitefox16 Active Member
136 messages
joined Jun 2024
#4 ·
redhawk76 said:Man, tell me about it... 🀷 (but that's why football is everything...πŸ˜‰)

You think I'm out here whining just because I had to scroll through ten pages of some idiot's thread?πŸ™„
feraltrucker5 feraltrucker5 Active Member
117 messages
joined Oct 2012
#5 ·
redhawk76 said:Can someone please explain the logic behind keeping posts from two years ago sitting right there in a thread that literally has "this year" in the title? Especially when we're talking about a topic where things change constantly and what was relevant two years ago is basically ancient history now.
Why don't they just clean up these threads and get rid of all the old, useless clutter?

Look, the whole editorial policy here on Reddit is built around archiving everything, and honestly, most users actually prefer it that way. If you go around suggesting we start nuking old threads, you're basically asking to be thrown to the wolves. 😬

If this specific situation over at Vogue is really eating at you, maybe try suggesting to their mods that they open a fresh thread for every season and just lock the old ones once they're done. 🀷 Or, you know, just stop quoting stuff from ages agoβ€”it's not like you'll break an arm having to scroll through a few pages of old posts to find what you need. πŸ˜‰
redhawk76 redhawk76 Active MemberOP
60 messages
joined May 2013
#6 ·
To be perfectly precise, I never once complained about my credit card debt or a broken arm... (If I did, please provide a quote...πŸ˜›)

The Reddit policy regarding preserving old threads and avoiding the deletion of past posts is quite sound when applied to "evergreen" discussions from some archived PDF, but taking a specific exampleβ€”like debating which boots were trending and where to buy them back in 2007 or 2008β€”really highlights the absurdity of this rule if it's applied without any selectivity. It is rather like insisting we preserve a thread about buying tickets to a Dallas Cowboys game from 2007. πŸ˜‰)

Fair enoughβ€”I’ll admit my previous post might have come across as a bit "stern," but my intentions weren't malicious; I was simply trying to point out ways we could streamline the site.

I don't see the need for such cynical reactions (granitefox16) to a suggestion that should, in theory, benefit all of us. 🀷
boldhound8 boldhound8 Regular
437 messages
joined Oct 2007
#7 ·
Supported!
Honestly, we should just wipe out all the old-school users and only keep the legends who've been here since 2009.😁

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

πŸ”— Similar threads