CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Miscellaneous › Whisky Vat 69

Whisky Vat 69

Started by Lawrence Garcia29 · · 👁 5 views · 9 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Lawrence Garcia29Kevin RuizJoseph Watson3Mark Martinez4rustyharbor66
Lawrence Garcia29 Lawrence Garcia29 NewcomerOP
5 messages
joined Aug 2009
#1 ·
Sorry if this isn't quite the right corner of the internet for this kind of thing 🙂 ...but look, I’m sitting here staring at a bottle of 69-year-old Scotch Whisky Vat that’s been sitting around for maybe 35 years now, and honestly? It breaks my heart just thinking about cracking it open myself. I know there are collectors out there—people who actually respect the history and the craft behind stuff like this—who would absolutely love to have it as the centerpiece of their home bar. So, if you happen to know anyone with that kind of taste, please, do me a favor and reach out!!!
Thanks... enjoy yourselves...
Kevin Ruiz Kevin Ruiz Newcomer
2 messages
joined Aug 2009
#2 ·
What kind of price would you even list her for?
Lawrence Garcia29 Lawrence Garcia29 NewcomerOP
5 messages
joined Aug 2009
#3 ·
Look, I honestly haven't made up my mind yet, because the bottle itself is pretty old and still has that vintage wax seal on it, so I’m fairly certain there’s some real value here, which is why I'm just sitting tight and waiting for people to start hitting me up with offers before I make a call. I remember a buddy of mine mentioning that an old 50-year-old bottle of Ballantine's can fetch upwards of 50 $0.00... and while this isn't Ballantine's, it’s at least been around for about 35 years, but once someone actually shows up looking serious about buying it, I'll be a lot more specific regarding the exact age and all that jazz...
Joseph Watson3 Joseph Watson3 Active Member
98 messages
joined Mar 2012
#4 ·
🤣

Whisky matures in the barrel, not the bottle—any liquid that’s just been sitting in glass for 35 or 50 years isn't gaining anything; if anything, it might actually be worth less than a fresh pour. So, unless yours has completely evaporated, you're looking at something worth roughly $33.
Lawrence Garcia29 Lawrence Garcia29 NewcomerOP
5 messages
joined Aug 2009
#5 ·
I have absolutely no clue where this whisky has been sitting all these years, but look, I’ve done my homework—scoured countless forums, even dug through some old English boards—and people are throwing around figures of $1,000 to $2,000 easily!!! And that’s for bottles even younger than mine. We’re talking about genuine finds, stuff tucked away in an attic or hidden in a basement for decades, so I’m telling you, there is no way my bottle is worth as little as you think it is!!! It really comes down to the fact that some folks are just obsessed; it’s their whole life, their passion, and they’ll drop a small fortune just to own a piece of that history. It’s kind of like how someone would pay a ridiculous amount of money just to get their hands on a jersey worn by Dražen Petrović that he tossed onto the court during some wild game and a fan managed to snag 🙂... maybe that’s a terrible comparison, but you get what I mean. As for whether the whisky actually gets better with age? Honestly, I don't know, science probably has an answer, but I am certain that cracking open a 40-year-old bottle has a certain magic to it that you just can't replicate...
Joseph Watson3 Joseph Watson3 Active Member
98 messages
joined Mar 2012
#6 ·
The issue here is that you don't just "have" a 40-year-old whisky—that term refers to liquid that has actually spent four decades maturing in a barrel. And yeah, once you get into that territory, we're talking about bottles that can easily run you thousands of dollars.

Now, sure, if someone specifically collects 40-year-old bottles, you might find a buyer, but I haven't exactly heard of people treating that as a mainstream hobby. It’s much more likely you just miscalculated your budget. 🙂
Mark Martinez4 Mark Martinez4 Active Member
50 messages
joined Feb 2009
#7 ·
If you're sitting on a bottle of cheap swill, it doesn't matter if you let it age for forty years—it’s still just garbage in a glass bottle. ☕
I’m telling you from personal experience...
Lawrence Garcia29 Lawrence Garcia29 NewcomerOP
5 messages
joined Aug 2009
#8 ·
Look, I’ll be the first to admit I’m completely out of my depth here, so I’m probably going to shut up before I say something even more ridiculous. But, just to clarify—because I did actually double-check what I wrote in my previous post—I was talking about those specific bottles that someone supposedly dug up from somewhere, like an old attic or a basement or whatever... I don't even know. Anyway, I’ve already reached out to some folks outside the US to see if they recognize anything, so we'll just have to wait and see if anyone actually gets back to me. Either way, thanks for bearing with me...
Mark Martinez4 Mark Martinez4 Active Member
50 messages
joined Feb 2009
#9 ·
Lawrence Garcia29 said:Alright, look—I’m clearly out of my depth on this specific topic, so I’ll step back and stop clogging up the thread. That said, I did double-check what I wrote earlier; I was specifically referring to those bottles someone might have unearthed from an old attic or a basement or somewhere along those lines... honestly, who knows? Anyway, I’ve reached out to some folks outside the US, so we’ll just have to wait and see if anyone actually gets back to me. Either way, thanks for listening...

If we were talking about wine sealed with cork, there might be some real value there—though, of course, it all hinges on the varietal and the vintage. But whisky? Not quite the same thing. I once opened a bottle that my late uncle had received from an American traveler they met in Italy right toward the end of World War II... and to put it bluntly, it was total junk.
rustyharbor66 rustyharbor66 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jun 2009
#10 ·
Vat 69 isn't exactly top-shelf—it’s decent enough, sure, but there is absolutely no way it warrants a price tag north of $67 per bottle. Let’s be real: whiskey spends its life in a cask, and once it hits that 28 to 30-year mark, you're looking at quality. Sitting in a glass bottle doesn't magically add value; it just means the liquid is old. Since Vat 69 is a blend, the math doesn't add up for me. If we were talking about Jack Daniel's, or even something like a Port of Savannah or a high-end Johnnie Walker—which, let's face it, is a blend, but one built from meticulously selected, certified single malts—then I might get the premium.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying you couldn't pull a nice profit off a bottle like this—there are plenty of collectors out there willing to pay a premium for good stuff, and again, Vat 69 isn't a bad pour.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register