CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Z-K and moderation

Z-K and moderation

Started by hollowwalker24 · · 👁 4 views · 1 reply

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants hollowwalker24Gerald Chavez7
hollowwalker24 hollowwalker24 MemberOP
26 messages
joined Mar 2020
#1 ·
Banned, according to the mod:

Irrelevant, derailing the thread

Someone just posted an identical link a minute ago and started a whole debate—so maybe just say "check the unread posts" or look back a few pages. You don't really need to write an essay, let people read it themselves, I guess.

The post in question, page 292:

A post on page 291, just a link:

Meanwhile, Google is terrorizing the subforum:

The situation in America:

Top poster, Google, 247 posts:

Shopping experiences during the lockdown

Top poster, Google, 281 posts:

Searching for reasons or conspiracy theories

Top poster, Google, 352 posts:

Masks

Top poster, Google, 273 posts:

Moderating the Coronavirus subforum

Top poster, Google, 59 posts:

That’s just a few threads at the top—I’m sure there are plenty more where they're the top poster and terrorizing people, but apparently that’s totally fine.

Then there's Ginger Rogers, who has a 3-month ban using a James Bond clone, which isn't even a secret:

She's posting in the subforum and the threads she was banned from:

But I guess that's also perfectly okay.

z_k, I know you have a thing against me, but some things are just too much.
Gerald Chavez7 Gerald Chavez7 Active Member
173 messages
joined Apr 2021
#2 ·
He could probably file an appeal somewhere else regarding that 5-point yellow card—it’s basically the only thing he’s actually got a case for at this point.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads