Jack Harris3 said:You might have tried to wrap your head around it, but some things just don't click, and that's that... If you truly understood the essence, that frequency wouldn't even register on your radar.
The syntax of a foreign language doesn't bother you either, provided you've internalized it and can actually function within it.
Haha, well, if you understand how electricity works, you aren't going to let your dog stick its nose in an outlet.
Men and women really do think differently; there's no denying that.
Which is precisely why I find this endless, utterly pointless comparison between the two so exhausting. What's the utility in it? You don't compare apples to oranges, yet people insist on comparing the sexes, even though there’s arguably less fundamental difference between an apple and an orange than there is between a man and a woman.
I agree with that. There is no point in comparing. Women simply need to realize they are the subordinate sex and learn to be quiet, listen, and just play nice... then maybe the world would actually stand a chance.
No woman is ever going to reject a truly top-tier man. One who is elite by her standards.
What looks like a "top-tier man" to you might look like a complete pig to some other woman.
And don't worry, women always have an explanation for everything, but since it's rarely "logical," why bother trying to argue it?
Sure, according to her CURRENT standards. Which could last for ten years or just for ten minutes. It all depends on how their 🙄
Women don't actually have concrete criteria for men because they don't truly comprehend them. They fall for behavior and attitude rather than actual personality. The worst player in our society can pick up almost any girl. He simply has access, an attitude, a system, and 90% of them fold. And even the remaining 10% will give in if he puts in the effort (which is the real challenge). Female psyches are so similar that once you crack the code, you can win over anyone. Of course, dealing with men is even easier—you just have to show 🙂 😁
In reality, when it comes to the "hunt," only one thing matters: the objective, the vision, and the mission. A man has a specific goal (getting a woman into bed) and a vision of how to achieve it. He treats the execution as a vital life mission. He moves strategically through conversations and behavior to guide her toward that state where his goal is realized. The difference between him and your "top-tier pig" is that the pig says whatever he thinks, whereas this guy doesn't care about truth, opinions, or dialogue... everything is subservient to the goal. He speaks and acts in a way he knows will trigger her—giving her that sense of security, relaxation, understanding, being on the "same wavelength," and so on.
In my experience, it has never happened that a man failed to charm a woman, regardless of all this conscious, intelligent, spiritual, and other feminine posturing.
So please, spare me the lecture on "criteria." You lot are about as capable of evaluating men as I am at calculating orbital mechanics for a SpaceX launch. 🙄
God, as if the world isn't already chaotic and bloody enough as it is...😛
And maybe you could explain to me why women should care about this supposed "male world and male way of thinking" when we are talking about them and their own private lives? When it comes to deciding which man they’re going to walk beside or live with, for instance? 🤔
A chaotic mess like that shouldn't be allowed to make any decisions at all. Honestly, they should just let old men arrange their marriages. That way, they'll listen to the elders, and then eventually to their husbands. What kind of "personal choice" is that anyway?
Oh, please—that exact little issue is the very root of what you wrote and the reason you hold such a specific opinion; so yes, there is absolutely a connection.
It feels like I might have missed a step somewhere here 🤔
P.S. Good grief, I love these kinds of topics 🙂