CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Philosophy › Habermas: The future of human nature

Habermas: The future of human nature

Started by nimblepilot29 · · 👁 13 views · 40 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants nimblepilot29Donna Campbell6Nicole Castillo11Harold Adams5mistyfox812Elizabeth Ruiz65Brian Parker6swiftcobra15
nimblepilot29 nimblepilot29 MemberOP
49 messages
joined Oct 2006
#41 ·
swiftcobra15 said:I'll admit my knowledge of Habermas is pretty limited, but I'll offer a few dogmatic answers to those questions:


Whatever this "human nature" might be, it would likely be unfixable, and perhaps even indestructible. 🙂
Whatever this "human nature" might be, it would likely be unfixable, and perhaps even indestructible. 🙂
Whatever this "human nature" might be, it would likely be unfixable, and perhaps even indestructible. 🙂

Whatever this supposed "human nature" might be, it would likely be fundamentally unfixable, and perhaps (?) even indestructible. 🙂
Just a small piece of advice regarding that first quote. I’d suggest picking up a book that tackles the whole concept of human nature from a completely different angle, and then try weighing your own claim against a fresh perspective. For starters, I’d highly recommend reading about Deep Ecology by Tom DeLay. Even if you don't end up agreeing, it’s certainly worth a read just to see how humanity is viewed through an ecological lens...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads