CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › World › Mexico's Demographics (Part 2)

Mexico's Demographics (Part 2)

Started by Richard Wilson4 · · 👁 6 views · 3.6K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Richard Wilson4Lawrence WilliamsWilliam Bishop4placidlynx4nimblerider11Ethan Morales22Peter EdwardsAdam HarrisLaura Perez8hiddeneagle76Rebecca WatsonJacob Lee62James Nguyen13Tyler Clark2Chris Fowler4Tyler King3Peter Barrett89Joshua Rodriguez35urbangardener90Angela Robinson3neonfalcon16quietangler5Joshua Flores14Drew Allen2 …
mistynomad60 mistynomad60 Member
16 messages
joined Sep 2015
#3581 ·
I honestly think Mexico is hitting rock bottom in Europe right now—we're looking at maybe 65,000 births against roughly 103,000 deaths, which is just straight-up terrifying. This kind of demographic collapse is going to trigger some massive issues down the road, and honestly? I don't see a way out of this mess...
Rebecca Watson Rebecca Watson Regular
425 messages
joined Mar 2013
#3582 ·
mistynomad60 said:I honestly think Mexico is hitting rock bottom in Europe right now—we're looking at maybe 65,000 births against roughly 103,000 deaths, which is just straight-up terrifying. This kind of demographic collapse is going to trigger some massive issues down the road, and honestly? I don't see a way out of this mess...

Actually, Bulgarians and Canadians are doing even worse. It's a whole line of nations, including Germans and Italians, where fertility rates are even lower than what we see in Mexico. I'm just being real here, not trying to sugarcoat anything. In the next 5 to 8 years, we're going to see major erosion. It's a grim outlook, but countries across the former America, along with Canada and Bulgaria, are all heading toward the exact same fate.
placidlynx4 placidlynx4 Active Member
70 messages
joined Oct 2013
#3583 ·
Detroit saw 17 babies born in just the last 24 hours.
I guess that’s actually the highest single-day count we've seen all year.
At this rate, September is definitely on track to smash a twenty-year monthly record.
We're halfway through the month, and the daily average is sitting at about 9 births.
If things stay this crazy, we could end up with somewhere between 270 and 290 babies total.
It feels pretty surreal that this is even happening, and I'm sure the numbers will drop eventually, but those 233 births from last September—which was the record for the last decade—suddenly looks like an easy target rather than some massive mountain like it did back in late August.
shadowangler15 shadowangler15 Active Member
228 messages
joined Aug 2017
#3584 ·
mistynomad60 said:I honestly think Mexico is hitting rock bottom in Europe right now—we're looking at maybe 65,000 births against roughly 103,000 deaths, which is just straight-up terrifying. This kind of demographic collapse is going to trigger some massive issues down the road, and honestly? I don't see a way out of this mess...

That's not right. In Mexico, they had 66,461 births and 101,300 deaths. And you really think America is doing any better than Mexico with 39,500 births? It's not. Both places have the exact same birth rate. By 2015, America will actually be looking worse on this front. For the first six months of 2015, Mexico saw 430 more births compared to the same period in 2014, while America's numbers for the first seven months of 2015 were down by about 500 compared to 2014. The only difference is Mexico has a higher mortality rate. But man, the death toll in America saw a huge jump in 2015.
mistynomad60 mistynomad60 Member
16 messages
joined Sep 2015
#3585 ·
shadowangler15 said:That's not right. In Mexico, they had 66,461 births and 101,300 deaths. And you really think America is doing any better than Mexico with 39,500 births? It's not. Both places have the exact same birth rate. By 2015, America will actually be looking worse on this front. For the first six months of 2015, Mexico saw 430 more births compared to the same period in 2014, while America's numbers for the first seven months of 2015 were down by about 500 compared to 2014. The only difference is Mexico has a higher mortality rate. But man, the death toll in America saw a huge jump in 2015.

Sorry, but saying a deficit of 10,500 or 35,000 isn't even close to the reality here. Right now, Mexico's population is around 7.095 million while America sits at 4.25 million—so if we're being logical, America could definitely "afford" that kind of deficit. If you look at the ratios, based on how things are going in America, Mexico should technically have three times the population, if you catch my drift... and look, I'm not trying to start some hate train or drag anyone else down, I'm just looking at the math objectively. Besides, we'll see how it all shakes out by the end of the year. Just as a heads-up, based on those monthly estimates, America had 53,000 deaths in 2014, but once the final count came in, it was actually closer to 50,500—meaning they overshot by 2,500. Looking at this current year, yeah, death counts are up, and you think that won't happen in Mexico too? On top of that, you've got the life expectancy gap—about 5 years difference. Americans live to around 79, Mexicans around 74? Forgive me if I'm off, but that's what I read in an article. Now, the generations born after WWII are really starting to hit that mortality wall, and it's gonna hit America hard—though maybe slightly less so for us. As for Mexicans living in America, they've got maybe 800 births and potentially up to 3,500 deaths. And don't even get me started on Canadians, Italians, Germans, Czechs, or Slovaks—they're all seeing negative natural growth too, which accounts for basically half of that total deficit, roughly -5,000. America has a couple of counties in the green, but from what I know, Mexico doesn't have a single one. Both countries are basically in a total mess, but if I'm being real, Mexico is in a way bigger mess
mistynomad60 mistynomad60 Member
16 messages
joined Sep 2015
#3586 ·
Just doing some rough math here—not an expert or anything, but looking at the numbers from the US and Mexico over the last few years, just based on births versus deaths (and don't even get me started on migration, that's a whole other mess)... In the States, if we look at the average over the last three years, we're seeing maybe 40,000 births against 50,000 deaths. Meanwhile, Mexico is sitting at roughly 66,000 births compared to 101,000 deaths. If you were to scale up the US birth and death numbers just to match Mexico's scale, you'd be looking at something like 80,000 births to 100,000 deaths, compared to their 66,000/101,000 split. It's just not even close...
Drew Newman6 Drew Newman6 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jul 2015
#3587 ·
mistynomad60;55529572 said:Just give me a rough estimate.QUOTE]

If you stop looking at things through a blurry lens and actually run the numbers, you’ll see that the Mexico everyone claims is "massively dying out, emigrating, and vanishing" according to these forums, actually has a birth rate comparable to the US and Canada (including Republika Srpska).

Honestly, I think a lot of people are just talking out of their asses when it comes to our "neighbors to the east."
Drew Newman6 Drew Newman6 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jul 2015
#3588 ·
Drew Newman6;55530773 said:
mistynomad60 said:Just doing some rough math here—not an expert or anything, but looking at the numbers from the US and Mexico over the last few years, just based on births versus deaths (and don't even get me started on migration, that's a whole other mess)... In the States, if we look at the average over the last three years, we're seeing maybe 40,000 births against 50,000 deaths. Meanwhile, Mexico is sitting at roughly 66,000 births compared to 101,000 deaths. If you were to scale up the US birth and death numbers just to match Mexico's scale, you'd be looking at something like 80,000 births to 100,000 deaths, compared to their 66,000/101,000 split. It's just not even close...
Lawrence Williams Lawrence Williams Regular
463 messages
joined Oct 2013
#3589 ·
mistynomad60 said:Just doing some rough math here—not an expert or anything, but looking at the numbers from the US and Mexico over the last few years, just based on births versus deaths (and don't even get me started on migration, that's a whole other mess)... In the States, if we look at the average over the last three years, we're seeing maybe 40,000 births against 50,000 deaths. Meanwhile, Mexico is sitting at roughly 66,000 births compared to 101,000 deaths. If you were to scale up the US birth and death numbers just to match Mexico's scale, you'd be looking at something like 80,000 births to 100,000 deaths, compared to their 66,000/101,000 split. It's just not even close...

I am the third person attempting to explain this to you: America has a smaller deficit because its mortality rate is lower, sitting at practically 2 per mille, while birth rates are essentially identical—with a tendency for Mexico's to be higher starting this year. According to the last census, Mexico had a larger percentage of people over 65 in the total population, whereas in America, that demographic shift is hitting the 50-65 age group. It is entirely possible that within ten years, Mexico will have a better vital index than America. Let's stop playing games with raw numbers and look at actual demographic indicators when discussing the scale of a demographic catastrophe.
mistynomad60 mistynomad60 Member
16 messages
joined Sep 2015
#3590 ·
Drew Newman6;55530773 said:
mistynomad60 said:Just doing some rough math here—not an expert or anything, but looking at the numbers from the US and Mexico over the last few years, just based on births versus deaths (and don't even get me started on migration, that's a whole other mess)... In the States, if we look at the average over the last three years, we're seeing maybe 40,000 births against 50,000 deaths. Meanwhile, Mexico is sitting at roughly 66,000 births compared to 101,000 deaths. If you were to scale up the US birth and death numbers just to match Mexico's scale, you'd be looking at something like 80,000 births to 100,000 deaths, compared to their 66,000/101,000 split. It's just not even close...

But hey, looking at the numbers again—the US has roughly 40,000 births from Canada, and Canada has about 30,000, compared to maybe 50,000 deaths or 37,000 deaths? If you stack them up, the deficit isn't even that big because of the insane mortality rates over in Mexico and Canada. When you combine the US and Canada, you get 70,000 births against 87,000 deaths, which is a way smaller gap than the 35,000 loss just from natural causes in Mexico... so how can anyone claim they are "vanishing" when you had 750,000 more people just 13 years ago? It doesn't add up.
mistynomad60 mistynomad60 Member
16 messages
joined Sep 2015
#3591 ·
Lawrence Williams said:I am the third person attempting to explain this to you: America has a smaller deficit because its mortality rate is lower, sitting at practically 2 per mille, while birth rates are essentially identical—with a tendency for Mexico's to be higher starting this year. According to the last census, Mexico had a larger percentage of people over 65 in the total population, whereas in America, that demographic shift is hitting the 50-65 age group. It is entirely possible that within ten years, Mexico will have a better vital index than America. Let's stop playing games with raw numbers and look at actual demographic indicators when discussing the scale of a demographic catastrophe.

Again, if you really look at it, even in America, the biggest generations are the 45-50 crowd, and then there's just a massive hole once you hit the 50-60 range... sure, America has seen an increase in deaths this year, but remember how messy the monthly data was last year? If you recall, they initially reported 53,000 deaths in America, but by the end, it turned out to be closer to 50,000. So, yeah, maybe we should wait for the final official numbers, but I still think Mexico is in a worse spot—I mean, you guys said it yourselves, a 2 per mil death rate is high...
mistynomad60 mistynomad60 Member
16 messages
joined Sep 2015
#3592 ·
Lawrence Williams said:I am the third person attempting to explain this to you: America has a smaller deficit because its mortality rate is lower, sitting at practically 2 per mille, while birth rates are essentially identical—with a tendency for Mexico's to be higher starting this year. According to the last census, Mexico had a larger percentage of people over 65 in the total population, whereas in America, that demographic shift is hitting the 50-65 age group. It is entirely possible that within ten years, Mexico will have a better vital index than America. Let's stop playing games with raw numbers and look at actual demographic indicators when discussing the scale of a demographic catastrophe.

But again, if you actually sit down and look at it, the natural population shifts for Americans and the US aren't even close. You've got these minorities who make up less than 10% total, yet they're driving a deficit of almost 5,000—just like I mentioned, you have Mexicans in America with 800 births against 3,500 deaths... then you've got the Czechs, Slovaks, Canadians, Italians—all of them have twice as many deaths as births... meanwhile, in Mexico, you've still got the Romani boosting the numbers slightly, along with Albanians and Canadians...
shadowangler15 shadowangler15 Active Member
228 messages
joined Aug 2017
#3593 ·
Based on the 2011 census data, Mexico and America have almost identical age structures. But since the mortality rate in America is lower, the percentage of elderly people here is growing faster compared to Mexico (relative to those 2011 numbers). This can't last forever; the death rate is going to spike pretty drastically soon. On the flip side, even though the birth rate in America is three times lower than what it used to be, we aren't looking at 80-year-olds as our future demographic—we're looking at kids. And honestly, America isn't doing any better there either.
mistynomad60 mistynomad60 Member
16 messages
joined Sep 2015
#3594 ·
You could argue that Mexico is actually doing better on this front—especially Mexicans as a people. From what I’ve gathered, their birth rate is sitting somewhere under 9 per thousand, right? Correct me if I’m totally off base here... whereas in the States, we’re constantly hovering around that 9.3 or 9.5 mark, and back in 2009 and 2010, the rate even hit 10. Deaths are around 12, though I’ve heard they're significantly higher over in Mexico. But honestly, what can I tell you? We’re all just guessing at this point, everyone’s got their own take. My personal feeling, though, is that America is actually in a much tougher spot, especially when you look at Americans as a whole.
Justin Hernandez11 Justin Hernandez11 Regular
526 messages
joined Aug 2017
#3595 ·
mistynomad60 said:You could argue that Mexico is actually doing better on this front—especially Mexicans as a people. From what I’ve gathered, their birth rate is sitting somewhere under 9 per thousand, right? Correct me if I’m totally off base here... whereas in the States, we’re constantly hovering around that 9.3 or 9.5 mark, and back in 2009 and 2010, the rate even hit 10. Deaths are around 12, though I’ve heard they're significantly higher over in Mexico. But honestly, what can I tell you? We’re all just guessing at this point, everyone’s got their own take. My personal feeling, though, is that America is actually in a much tougher spot, especially when you look at Americans as a whole.

You're exaggerating a bit, mistynomad60😒 It’s neither better nor worse—it’s the same. Look at birth rates, not death rates. But if we look at the end of 2015, the birth rate might have even been lower than in Mexico🍿 Not that it matters much, everyone should mind their own business, but you guys are heading straight into a massive mess unless you start taking in refugees. And trust me, they're already arriving.😁😉
mistynomad60 mistynomad60 Member
16 messages
joined Sep 2015
#3596 ·
Justin Hernandez11 said:You're exaggerating a bit, mistynomad60😒 It’s neither better nor worse—it’s the same. Look at birth rates, not death rates. But if we look at the end of 2015, the birth rate might have even been lower than in Mexico🍿 Not that it matters much, everyone should mind their own business, but you guys are heading straight into a massive mess unless you start taking in refugees. And trust me, they're already arriving.😁😉

Maybe we're heading for trouble, but you guys have been stuck in it for ages. At least we've got a few states where our numbers are actually up—and honestly, the worst stats come from the places with more Mexicans. Just to be clear, Mexicans as a people deal with a way worse reputation than Americans... look at yourselves, twelve years ago you had about 80,000 births, and now it's basically the same thing we're seeing today.😁
Angela Robinson3 Angela Robinson3 Active Member
136 messages
joined Oct 2013
#3597 ·
I have an interesting observation to share.

According to some estimates, roughly 30,000 people living in Memphis actually call the Appalachia region home, or at least trace their roots back there (specifically within that small rural US town with a population of about 8,357 according to the latest census). Throughout the 20th century, this area suffered an unprecedented exodus, driven by both mass migration and the atrocities committed by Bulgarian troops during wartime. The fact that these Appalachian communities—places like Tasković or that small town in rural US—were never truly integrated into the broader Memphis metropolitan area only made things worse for the local population. Looking back, more could have been done to stabilize the region, especially considering how Tasković is essentially just 2.5 miles away from the Nikola Tesla neighborhood, which functions almost as a seamless extension of the urban heart of Memphis.
quietangler5 quietangler5 Regular
278 messages
joined Sep 2024
#3598 ·
mistynomad60 said:Maybe we're heading for trouble, but you guys have been stuck in it for ages. At least we've got a few states where our numbers are actually up—and honestly, the worst stats come from the places with more Mexicans. Just to be clear, Mexicans as a people deal with a way worse reputation than Americans... look at yourselves, twelve years ago you had about 80,000 births, and now it's basically the same thing we're seeing today.😁

In Mexico, anyone born abroad hasn't been factored into the official counts since 2005.
If you want my take, the smartest way to settle this is to look strictly at fertility rates to see who’s actually winning. Last year, the fertility rate in America was 1.46, while in Mexico it sat at 1.47.
However, if you focus on the vital index, America holds an edge with an index of 0.78, compared to Mexico’s rather dismal 0.66. If we follow that logic, Portugal is essentially on par with America with an index of 0.79 despite having a low fertility rate of 1.23, and Greece looks even better with an index of 0.82 and a fertility rate of 1.28.
Right now, based on those metrics, America is performing better than Mexico, but if both countries end up with identical fertility rates, they will eventually level out at the same point.
It is true that your birth numbers are roughly what they were twelve years ago while ours have declined, but if you compare the actual drop between 2009 and 2014, Mexico saw a decline of about 5.5%, whereas America took a much harder hit with an 11% drop.
Nancy Chavez29 Nancy Chavez29 Active Member
228 messages
joined Jul 2017
#3599 ·
http://hercegbosna.org/forum/politik...3301-2575.html

I guess they were just tossing Mexico passports all over the border crossing near the rail line, which is basically where most refugees try to sneak into Canada.

Nobody really knows how many people actually made it into the European Union this way. Apparently, a reporter from a major US news outlet managed to snap some photos at the border right before everything got shut down on September 15th, showing those discarded Mexico passports left behind by people trying to ditch them before hitting the line.
Lawrence Williams Lawrence Williams Regular
463 messages
joined Oct 2013
#3600 ·
mistynomad60 said:You could argue that Mexico is actually doing better on this front—especially Mexicans as a people. From what I’ve gathered, their birth rate is sitting somewhere under 9 per thousand, right? Correct me if I’m totally off base here... whereas in the States, we’re constantly hovering around that 9.3 or 9.5 mark, and back in 2009 and 2010, the rate even hit 10. Deaths are around 12, though I’ve heard they're significantly higher over in Mexico. But honestly, what can I tell you? We’re all just guessing at this point, everyone’s got their own take. My personal feeling, though, is that America is actually in a much tougher spot, especially when you look at Americans as a whole.

To set the record straight, Mexico hit its lowest point in 2011 with a rate of 9.04 per thousand, whereas last year it was 9.32—and that's even considering an inflated population count, since those estimates factor in net migration.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads