CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Partial credit?

Partial credit?

Started by Charles Wood73 · · 👁 2 views · 82 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Charles Wood73wearybison63Larry Walker24Amanda James27mistyhound94Nicholas Grant20Joshua Perez6Alexander Adams94Ashley Vaughn79Adam Moore12restlesstiger49William Thompson10Rachel Richardsondustypilot11George Ramos13brightcrane56Walter Davisbriskbadger90wanderingheron9Carl Moore8Sam Jones8Betty FowlerTaylor Gonzalez79feralranger …
mistyhound94 mistyhound94 Active Member
62 messages
joined Jun 2012
#21 ·
Ashley Vaughn79 said:mistyhound94, why the complaining now?

First it was a Wiki issue, now it's Sylar... just give me a list of everyone bothering you and we'll ban them all so you can finally be happy here in the US. 😍

leteći, I have no idea where you came from, but honestly... just go away, you aren't even posting in the US.
Snuff films aren't really the topic at hand, but sure, if interpreting it that way makes you feel better.

You clearly have a comprehension issue, but the bigger problem is the crew you choose to tolerate. As a moderator, you should never be biased, let alone favor people you personally support. That’s exactly why everyone is constantly complaining about Wikipedia and Sylar. On top of that, you’re basically the definition of a gossip; you even admitted yourself that you do it all the time, claiming your inbox is overflowing with all those rumors you keep. Honestly, you shouldn't even be a moderator because of that, but I guess since you suck up to the boss, you're protected—just like some pampered grizzly bear.

Look, I’m not advocating for banning anyone, nor am I against Wikipedia or Sylar. Don't try to project your own thoughts onto me; that isn't what I'm saying. I am simply stating that there needs to be some order here—the kind of structure you see in Psychology or even at an Ivy League university. But achieving that here seems impossible, I guess, because you would actually have to hold your favorites accountable when they act out. You even allowed those intense verbal attacks from Sylar against people just trying to post ads based on their own criteria. He treats them like outcasts, completely ignoring the fact that there are actual human beings on the other side. He treats them like garbage while acting superior, especially regarding that Mengele mandibula topic, which is probably one of the most useless discussions ever, especially in a sub-forum called Lonely Hearts. Anyone reading that might actually think people are facing real issues, when really, the thread has nothing to do with the subject; it's just a playground for him to keep doing exactly what he wants. Not that he's perfect himself—he has those ridiculous mustaches—but apparently, pointing that out is considered an insult now. So, I suppose if someone posts an ad, he just has free rein to belittle them.

Look, I know exactly what I did and why I did it. I’m not running from that. But honestly, I had to step in, even if it meant showing everyone else that they can just keep riding over people without facing any consequences. And that partial ban you handed out? You only pulled that because Wikipedia was whining about not having a playground to churn out mindless posts that don't add anything intelligent or valuable to the discussion. It gets worse when he starts going on about "proteins," "sweeties," "simps," and all those other creepy, predatory terms used for older women—or begging for photos because he clearly isn't getting enough attention at home. Then there's the talk about anal and "cerebral" sex just because he learned a big word and thinks sounding "smart" makes it okay. It builds a certain kind of reputation. On top of that, this pathetic Reddit doesn't even have a real ignore function. If you quote someone in a thread, their nonsense still shows up anyway, which makes ignoring them completely pointless. When things become useless like that, people just check out. They don't want to inhabit an environment like this—an environment that moderators actually ought to be managing. I suppose Ludica would have wanted to clean things up, and I would've trusted her more; I even took penalties and warnings from her in the past. But because of you, that isn't possible anymore, since you've just carved out your own little corner to play your own games.

I suppose I’d love for everyone to show up—and I mean absolutely everyone who has an opinion on how this place is moderated, especially regarding your specific leadership. It would be helpful if you actually got a sense of just how poorly you handle things. You're impossible to reason with; I even tried talking to you in person once, but nothing gets through because you just don't seem to have the capacity to grasp where the actual issues lie. You just fixate on a handful of people like me, then tell us to shut up or get lost, which seems to be your favorite way to end any debate. You miss the big picture entirely.

That partial ban they slapped on me—supposedly just to see if things would change—was way too short. It’s pretty obvious it was only done to give you some excuse to bring Wikipedia back. Nothing more. And honestly, that makes you a bad moderator. That's just one thing, though. Which is why I asked Nice to restore it, because I have zero interest in looking at you, or Wikipedia, or Sylar, or any of those other assholes who seem to have nothing better to do than police everyone else and treat people like they're beneath them.

Maybe instead of hanging onto this Reddit, you should focus on your actual life; perhaps spending less time here would help you find some direction. And listen, next time you're out socializing and you ask people to keep quiet about your forum drama because of whatever private stuff you've been airing, just know it’s all going to come out eventually, and then I’ll actually start worrying about you. I care now, but you're pushing it with this behavior. If you won't change your ways, and if you keep treating me like some whining kid, you might end up being the one doing the crying. Don't let that happen. Consider yourself warned.
restlesstiger49 restlesstiger49 Regular
271 messages
joined Jul 2012
#22 ·
Ashley Vaughn79 said:Your main account is still banned for another 24 hours, yet here you are posting from an alt.
Usually, other mods would grant permissions to an alt and then extend the original ban by a week as punishment for using a secondary account.

I suppose it wouldn't be a good idea for me to do that again, right?

People tend to call for stricter moderation only when they think it won't affect them personally, assuming it will only target those they don't like.
That isn't how it works.

It's true, partial removals don't just happen on their own. 😁

Even if requested, all active mods have to agree before anything is removed.
Who knows who will be stepping into my role one day.

I'm not planning on stepping down right now, but life is unpredictable.

As a moderator, you really ought to know that the rule against using two accounts only applies if you're posting within the same sub-forum. You should know that... since you're a moderator. So, how is it possible you don't?

Since we aren't talking about the same sub-forum (this PDF section, right?), you don't actually have any grounds for that. Besides, I can easily find a Nicin PM where she gave me permission to use two accounts on the US site, provided I didn't confuse anyone—which, in my experience, hasn't happened once on the US site.

You still haven't grasped it—people are asking for strict moderation that applies equally to everyone, not double standards where the rules change depending on who is being watched. I highly doubt you're dim enough to miss that; rather, I think you're just playing dumb. It’s much easier to lean on a strawman argument and falsely accuse people of wanting special treatment than it is to actually perform quality moderator work on the US site using consistent criteria for everyone.

Also, this whole attempt to shift the blame onto Mickey Mouse—who apparently bothers everyone (and let's be honest, you aren't so clueless that you don't see what you're trying to do)—is a total wash. He's the "problem" now, along with anyone else who finds the current moderation standards frustrating, instead of addressing the actual group of frustrated trolls and one-liner spammers.

But hey, I won't hold it against you. Given the circumstances...
Alexander Adams94 Alexander Adams94 Active Member
79 messages
joined Dec 2014
#23 ·
Ashley Vaughn79 said:So?

Go ahead and find me a moderator that everyone actually likes and agrees with.
It doesn't exist.

If I actually had the time and if people were actually picking me, I’d be that guy. I'd be a phenomenal designer.
Adam Moore12 Adam Moore12 Member
38 messages
joined Aug 2020
#24 ·
I’m with you on that 👍.
But don't aim that at latica; aim it at yourself and whoever else actually bothers to read the Reddit rules for once 😢.
William Thompson10 William Thompson10 Member
12 messages
joined Jun 2022
#25 ·
Alexander Adams94 said:If I actually had the time and if people were actually picking me, I’d be that guy. I'd be a phenomenal designer.

🤣
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#26 ·
restlesstiger49 said:As a moderator, you really ought to know that the rule against using two accounts only applies if you're posting within the same sub-forum. You should know that... since you're a moderator. So, how is it possible you don't?

Since we aren't talking about the same sub-forum (this PDF section, right?), you don't actually have any grounds for that. Besides, I can easily find a Nicin PM where she gave me permission to use two accounts on the US site, provided I didn't confuse anyone—which, in my experience, hasn't happened once on the US site.

You still haven't grasped it—people are asking for strict moderation that applies equally to everyone, not double standards where the rules change depending on who is being watched. I highly doubt you're dim enough to miss that; rather, I think you're just playing dumb. It’s much easier to lean on a strawman argument and falsely accuse people of wanting special treatment than it is to actually perform quality moderator work on the US site using consistent criteria for everyone.

Also, this whole attempt to shift the blame onto Mickey Mouse—who apparently bothers everyone (and let's be honest, you aren't so clueless that you don't see what you're trying to do)—is a total wash. He's the "problem" now, along with anyone else who finds the current moderation standards frustrating, instead of addressing the actual group of frustrated trolls and one-liner spammers.

But hey, I won't hold it against you. Given the circumstances...

That simply isn't true.
Well, you are the living embodiment of that exact example.

A ban issued against a single profile applies to all associated clones—it doesn't matter how many there are.
And who actually knows anything about them?
Why are you intentionally breaking the rules?
Just because you have an alt account for the US doesn't mean that while your main is under a ban, you can just hop over and start posting on Reddit—for example.
So, you’re out here running two different profiles to post about the exact same topics—all just to dodge a ban once you finally get caught.

There was that topic you started over in the States.
You were complaining about me—the only one actually staying on topic—while completely ignoring everyone else who was just flooding the thread with spam.
Why?

There are endless examples of this—including various clones and those tired explanations for why certain people feel the need to complain. 🤷

What latica is saying is the truth.
It’s quite literal—people who are just looking for special treatment are the ones complaining because they can't stand seeing anyone else move up the ladder. 🤷

Imagine that—somebody you can't stand actually being allowed to post on a public Reddit thread? Unbelievable.🙂
Honestly, it’s just an embarrassment. 🙂
Alexander Adams94 Alexander Adams94 Active Member
79 messages
joined Dec 2014
#27 ·
Maybe Nice would be a better fit for the modding scene than I am. Out of all the current mods, I think I’ve got the right vibe for it, but honestly, I just don't have the bandwidth to take it on. It’ll have to stay as just an idea.

Lata is essential if we want some cubism or Dadaism on Reddit—you need that postmodern edge to balance out the more traditional modding styles. It’s not that she isn't perfect, but her versatility keeps things interesting. She’s basically the Ionesco of this community; it would be pretty dull if every single mod was just a Flaubert or a Tolstoy.
Ashley Vaughn79 Ashley Vaughn79 Active Member
95 messages
joined Jan 2003
#28 ·
restlesstiger49 said:As a moderator, you really ought to know that the rule against using two accounts only applies if you're posting within the same sub-forum. You should know that... since you're a moderator. So, how is it possible you don't?

Since we aren't talking about the same sub-forum (this PDF section, right?), you don't actually have any grounds for that. Besides, I can easily find a Nicin PM where she gave me permission to use two accounts on the US site, provided I didn't confuse anyone—which, in my experience, hasn't happened once on the US site.

You still haven't grasped it—people are asking for strict moderation that applies equally to everyone, not double standards where the rules change depending on who is being watched. I highly doubt you're dim enough to miss that; rather, I think you're just playing dumb. It’s much easier to lean on a strawman argument and falsely accuse people of wanting special treatment than it is to actually perform quality moderator work on the US site using consistent criteria for everyone.

Also, this whole attempt to shift the blame onto Mickey Mouse—who apparently bothers everyone (and let's be honest, you aren't so clueless that you don't see what you're trying to do)—is a total wash. He's the "problem" now, along with anyone else who finds the current moderation standards frustrating, instead of addressing the actual group of frustrated trolls and one-liner spammers.

But hey, I won't hold it against you. Given the circumstances...


Don't try to bring up Nice now just to twist what was actually said.
I guess she didn't think you could just use a clone while your main account is banned.

I guess Milojko is sitting in a ban since April 10th. You were posting perfectly fine on the US boards under restlesstiger49 just yesterday, so maybe you shouldn't be bringing up stricter moderation rules now?

I guess stricter moderation would be if you, restlesstiger49, were permanently banned, while Milojko's suspension got extended by another week.

Get lost and go jump in a lake.

Alexander Adams94 said:Maybe Nice would be a better fit for the modding scene than I am. Out of all the current mods, I think I’ve got the right vibe for it, but honestly, I just don't have the bandwidth to take it on. It’ll have to stay as just an idea.

Lata is essential if we want some cubism or Dadaism on Reddit—you need that postmodern edge to balance out the more traditional modding styles. It’s not that she isn't perfect, but her versatility keeps things interesting. She’s basically the Ionesco of this community; it would be pretty dull if every single mod was just a Flaubert or a Tolstoy.


Please stop making fun of me... you're starting to get on my nerves, too. 😁
dustypilot11 dustypilot11 Member
33 messages
joined Nov 2010
#29 ·
restlesstiger49 said:As a moderator, you really ought to know that the rule against using two accounts only applies if you're posting within the same sub-forum. You should know that... since you're a moderator. So, how is it possible you don't?

Since we aren't talking about the same sub-forum (this PDF section, right?), you don't actually have any grounds for that. Besides, I can easily find a Nicin PM where she gave me permission to use two accounts on the US site, provided I didn't confuse anyone—which, in my experience, hasn't happened once on the US site.

You still haven't grasped it—people are asking for strict moderation that applies equally to everyone, not double standards where the rules change depending on who is being watched. I highly doubt you're dim enough to miss that; rather, I think you're just playing dumb. It’s much easier to lean on a strawman argument and falsely accuse people of wanting special treatment than it is to actually perform quality moderator work on the US site using consistent criteria for everyone.

Also, this whole attempt to shift the blame onto Mickey Mouse—who apparently bothers everyone (and let's be honest, you aren't so clueless that you don't see what you're trying to do)—is a total wash. He's the "problem" now, along with anyone else who finds the current moderation standards frustrating, instead of addressing the actual group of frustrated trolls and one-liner spammers.

But hey, I won't hold it against you. Given the circumstances...

Give me a break. When you're banned, you aren't supposed to post anywhere with any profile. But you, constantly, literally constantly, start posting from another account the second you get banned. Honestly, you should've been hit with a partial ban ages ago—your posts aren't even decent, even back before there was a Wikipedia, your whole body of work is just a joke. Real funny, calling out everyone else for the rules.

Peppa Pig, I miss you. 🕺
Adam Moore12 Adam Moore12 Member
38 messages
joined Aug 2020
#30 ·
dustypilot11 said:Give me a break. When you're banned, you aren't supposed to post anywhere with any profile. But you, constantly, literally constantly, start posting from another account the second you get banned. Honestly, you should've been hit with a partial ban ages ago—your posts aren't even decent, even back before there was a Wikipedia, your whole body of work is just a joke. Real funny, calling out everyone else for the rules.

Peppa Pig, I miss you. 🕺

image

We'll always have Paris Anida, man, those few weeks without our respected Reddit user Rachel Richardson 🙂.

But alas, during those three weeks, he spread through the rest of the site like a cancer; you could see him greeting people on the newbie threads, and he wouldn't miss a chance to post in the gaming section either.

I guess it’s better for the other moderators if he just clutters up "only" the US section instead of polluting the entire platform.

Apparently, over 160 THOUSAND posts about girlfriends, cute pics, protein, boobs, asses, anal stuff, and all that other filth are absolutely necessary for this site.

160 THOUSAND PIECES OF SHIT.

🤮
George Ramos13 George Ramos13 Member
17 messages
joined Nov 2020
#31 ·
Alexander Adams94 said:It's pointless. Everyone ends up opening new threads just to come back anyway.

Personally, I’m fine with Lata; I get along great with her. I actually dig her modern approach to moderation. This forum could really use a moderator like her.

Honestly, nobody gives a damn who you're buddies with. 😵
George Ramos13 George Ramos13 Member
17 messages
joined Nov 2020
#32 ·
The constant nagging on Wikipedia has become the least of my worries compared to the absolute zoo of lunatics congregating on the PDF. It’s not even about having different opinions anymore; we’re looking at a total black hole of non-constructive, genuinely disturbing content. Look, Lat, I know you’ve got a life outside of this, but maybe the fix here is just stricter moderation before things spiral out of control. That whole mess on that Sylar thread? That was an escalation happening right before our eyes yesterday and the day before.
Joshua Perez6 Joshua Perez6 Member
16 messages
joined Jul 2022
#33 ·
Adam Moore12 said:image

We'll always have Paris Anida, man, those few weeks without our respected Reddit user Rachel Richardson 🙂.

But alas, during those three weeks, he spread through the rest of the site like a cancer; you could see him greeting people on the newbie threads, and he wouldn't miss a chance to post in the gaming section either.

I guess it’s better for the other moderators if he just clutters up "only" the US section instead of polluting the entire platform.

Apparently, over 160 THOUSAND posts about girlfriends, cute pics, protein, boobs, asses, anal stuff, and all that other filth are absolutely necessary for this site.

160 THOUSAND PIECES OF SHIT.

🤮

God dammit!
Aukurac, I was gonna jump on some random post, but let's be real: it's obvious who the bitch is here.🙂
Just look at what people are saying about her in the DMs—everyone knows she's a total slut.🙂

Once we're done, let's just hang out together and let our buddy Mengele mandibula dissect us. I'm rooting for the "subhuman" label.🙂
brightcrane56 brightcrane56 Member
44 messages
joined Sep 2007
#34 ·
Ashley Vaughn79 said:Don't try to bring up Nice now just to twist what was actually said.
I guess she didn't think you could just use a clone while your main account is banned.

I guess Milojko is sitting in a ban since April 10th. You were posting perfectly fine on the US boards under restlesstiger49 just yesterday, so maybe you shouldn't be bringing up stricter moderation rules now?

I guess stricter moderation would be if you, restlesstiger49, were permanently banned, while Milojko's suspension got extended by another week.

Get lost and go jump in a lake.

Please stop making fun of me... you're starting to get on my nerves, too. 😁

The thing is, Nick Quark is banned, yet this guy is running around the site with about ten different alts, all while acting like he speaks for Nicin PM.
So, you really ought to be careful with those Nicin PM stances, because they aren't exactly applied equally to everyone.
Walter Davis Walter Davis Member
20 messages
joined Dec 2021
#35 ·
Adam Moore12 said:image

We'll always have Paris Anida, man, those few weeks without our respected Reddit user Rachel Richardson 🙂.

But alas, during those three weeks, he spread through the rest of the site like a cancer; you could see him greeting people on the newbie threads, and he wouldn't miss a chance to post in the gaming section either.

I guess it’s better for the other moderators if he just clutters up "only" the US section instead of polluting the entire platform.

Apparently, over 160 THOUSAND posts about girlfriends, cute pics, protein, boobs, asses, anal stuff, and all that other filth are absolutely necessary for this site.

160 THOUSAND PIECES OF SHIT.

🤮

It's super weird to me that you only see a problem with Rachel Richardson. Did the quality of the US really get that much better while he was gone?
What about everything else? Like, the other day those incel types went wild, and you were chatting comfortably with almost every single one of those blackpill guys—probably being nice, I guess, but I think you just helped them spread.
dustypilot11 dustypilot11 Member
33 messages
joined Nov 2010
#36 ·
Adam Moore12 said:image

We'll always have Paris Anida, man, those few weeks without our respected Reddit user Rachel Richardson 🙂.

But alas, during those three weeks, he spread through the rest of the site like a cancer; you could see him greeting people on the newbie threads, and he wouldn't miss a chance to post in the gaming section either.

I guess it’s better for the other moderators if he just clutters up "only" the US section instead of polluting the entire platform.

Apparently, over 160 THOUSAND posts about girlfriends, cute pics, protein, boobs, asses, anal stuff, and all that other filth are absolutely necessary for this site.

160 THOUSAND PIECES OF SHIT.

🤮

He’s a site-wide issue that nobody actually wants to deal with.
Walter Davis said:It's super weird to me that you only see a problem with Rachel Richardson. Did the quality of the US really get that much better while he was gone?
What about everything else? Like, the other day those incel types went wild, and you were chatting comfortably with almost every single one of those blackpill guys—probably being nice, I guess, but I think you just helped them spread.

That's what I told Ashley Vaughn79.
Right now there's no active mod on the US section, and yeah, someone should've stepped in when they were going crazy in the thread.
Anyway, I'm bummed about the people who left, especially Peppa Pig. She really knew how to shut them down, mostly by just making fun of herself.
Adam Moore12 Adam Moore12 Member
38 messages
joined Aug 2020
#37 ·
Walter Davis said:It's super weird to me that you only see a problem with Rachel Richardson. Did the quality of the US really get that much better while he was gone?
What about everything else? Like, the other day those incel types went wild, and you were chatting comfortably with almost every single one of those blackpill guys—probably being nice, I guess, but I think you just helped them spread.

Of course I don't see the problem only with Rachel Richardson. But in my opinion, the first step should definitely be getting rid of that spammer. There's zero constructive value there; when he isn't spamming, he just flips his entire stance depending on whose ass he's trying to kiss. But what I hate most out of everything Joshua Perez6 mentioned is the way people insult others through a third party. When I see that level of lowliness and cowardice, it genuinely makes me sick—and I don't mean figuratively or just using an emoji, I feel physically nauseous.

As for the blackpillers, yeah, I've talked to them, and I was pleasant and well-meaning about it. I talk that way with Sisyphus and TNT too, who both bring their own specific brands of trouble to the subforum.

But when the blackpillers start using Nazi terminology, or when TNT starts writing about how people with disabilities shouldn't have even been born, or when Sisyphus calls women who have legal abortions "witches," "exterminators," and "murderers"—that’s when I react.

Did you miss my reactions? Because I reacted every single time.

I don't think moderation needs to be "stricter" in some abstract sense; honestly, I'm just glad the position exists at all.

I don't think any of the people mentioned should be kicked out entirely, but I do think there should be clear bans: a ban for Sylar for physical insults, for the dead guy and Junius for misogyny, for TNT for off-topic posting, and for Sisyphus for those horrific comments. No need to delete posts, just issue the bans so it's crystal clear what these people are writing and why it violates the principles of any civilized community.

That way, I believe people will think twice—maybe even three times—before they hit send.

Plus, it would attract new people to the subforum—people looking for actual discussion and communication, knowing they're in a place where if someone breaks the rules, there's actually someone to report it to or warn.

Instead, we have a moderator who loudly declares she isn't moderating, and another moderator who acts stupid just to protect a holy little clique and nothing else.

Because when I complained to her about that religious thread, it was just "whine, whine, okay, close the thread." You don't need to close a single thread, Ashley Vaughn79, but you DO need to moderate. Either do the job or get out of the way.
Walter Davis Walter Davis Member
20 messages
joined Dec 2021
#38 ·
Adam Moore12 said:Of course I don't see the problem only with Rachel Richardson. But in my opinion, the first step should definitely be getting rid of that spammer. There's zero constructive value there; when he isn't spamming, he just flips his entire stance depending on whose ass he's trying to kiss. But what I hate most out of everything Joshua Perez6 mentioned is the way people insult others through a third party. When I see that level of lowliness and cowardice, it genuinely makes me sick—and I don't mean figuratively or just using an emoji, I feel physically nauseous.

As for the blackpillers, yeah, I've talked to them, and I was pleasant and well-meaning about it. I talk that way with Sisyphus and TNT too, who both bring their own specific brands of trouble to the subforum.

But when the blackpillers start using Nazi terminology, or when TNT starts writing about how people with disabilities shouldn't have even been born, or when Sisyphus calls women who have legal abortions "witches," "exterminators," and "murderers"—that’s when I react.

Did you miss my reactions? Because I reacted every single time.

I don't think moderation needs to be "stricter" in some abstract sense; honestly, I'm just glad the position exists at all.

I don't think any of the people mentioned should be kicked out entirely, but I do think there should be clear bans: a ban for Sylar for physical insults, for the dead guy and Junius for misogyny, for TNT for off-topic posting, and for Sisyphus for those horrific comments. No need to delete posts, just issue the bans so it's crystal clear what these people are writing and why it violates the principles of any civilized community.

That way, I believe people will think twice—maybe even three times—before they hit send.

Plus, it would attract new people to the subforum—people looking for actual discussion and communication, knowing they're in a place where if someone breaks the rules, there's actually someone to report it to or warn.

Instead, we have a moderator who loudly declares she isn't moderating, and another moderator who acts stupid just to protect a holy little clique and nothing else.

Because when I complained to her about that religious thread, it was just "whine, whine, okay, close the thread." You don't need to close a single thread, Ashley Vaughn79, but you DO need to moderate. Either do the job or get out of the way.

Yes, you did. Personally, I think we should be stepping in way before things even get to the extreme examples you listed. That goes for both the mods and the users on Reddit.
Adam Moore12 Adam Moore12 Member
38 messages
joined Aug 2020
#39 ·
Sure. But who am I supposed to be reacting to?

If only His Holiness of Anderlon would actually show up, but I guess we can only dream about that.
Adam Moore12 Adam Moore12 Member
38 messages
joined Aug 2020
#40 ·
Wiki said:The attitude of someone who constantly calls other forum members pieces of shit, drops a sarcastic smiley on posts they disagree with, and generally resorts to tribalism whenever a serious discussion breaks out—it’s not because they think they're superior, it’s just 🙂

What other forum members? I'm calling your posts garbage, which is exactly what this entire forum is filled with from top to bottom.

And regarding your posts, like I said, it isn't that I disagree with them—it's that they make me sick. There aren't any actual arguments in those posts, just pure crap.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads