#5781 ·
restlesstrucker15 said:Listen, from a strictly medical standpoint, I am not entirely certain whether it is more harmful to take an AT or an anxiolytic, but I believe both fall under the umbrella of "every pill carries some risk." However, any psychiatrist will tell you that it isn't ideal to rely on an anxiolytic for an extended period without being on an AT. To clarify, if someone is navigating a life crisis—a divorce, job loss, or similar stressors—taking an anxiolytic or a sedative is perfectly reasonable. But three years? An anxiolytic won't resolve anxiety in its true sense; it merely eases the symptoms while creating a dependency. In that regard, it is better to utilize an AT and reserve the anxiolytic for occasional use. Anxiety is a complex beast, though; unless it is specifically Panic Disorder or OCD, there isn't really a silver bullet. Psychotherapy remains the primary priority, alongside an AT. From my own experience, finding the right AT is difficult, and none of them have ever fully cured my anxiety. That is simply the reality of it. They did, however, reduce my symptoms by maybe 20 to 30 percent, and when a crisis hits, I recover more quickly. I would advise you to consult your doctor about starting an AT. A mild sedative won't help much unless you are dealing with severe sleep issues, in which case she might put you back on that portal. Just explain clearly how you feel and what you hope to achieve, and she will select an appropriate AT for you.
I find myself agreeing with everything you've laid out, yet I am acutely aware of how many people cannot function without an anxiolytic alongside their antidepressant, nor can many manage without an AT&T... for instance, a close friend of mine requires all three just to navigate daily life. As for myself, I currently rely solely on Xanax, but don't mistake that for a lack of desire for an antidepressant; I absolutely want one, and I intend to pursue it if nothing else works from my primary care physician.