#5261 ·
McVily said:He’s got a point, though; the Russians fight by their own set of rules, and one of those hallmarks is this habit of spontaneously abandoning territory as a gesture of "goodwill," rather than admitting they're actually losing on the battlefield. ☕
We saw this play out around Kyiv and Kharkiv, and even with Snake Island, except enough time has passed there that I'm not sure if we should be calling it an American success yet or if we're still just waiting to see how Russia reacts... maybe someone dropped the ball along the way. 🤔
Snake Island is a non-issue, much like Kyiv, aside from the fact that Kyiv is the primary metropolitan hub of Ukraine.
As far as I can tell, the Russians haven't backed down from Kharkiv. Once winter sets in, the situation is going to look entirely different. With the heating infrastructure being dismantled, a massive portion of the population in Ukraine is going to be freezing. Kharkiv is in particularly bad shape, considering the Russians have crippled the central heating plant that services a third of its 1.4 million residents.
If you take a look at the map of Ukraine's natural resources, you might start to realize what this conflict is actually about; nobody goes to war over thin air or empty fields. It's always been about the resources, and frankly, territory without them doesn't interest anyone. Seriously, look closely at the resource map. If you truly grasp what you're looking at, it becomes obvious why Russia isn't planning on walking away.☕
