Roger Campbell3 said:Knowing the Russians, that sounds completely unrealistic to me.
Russia would sign a peace treaty tomorrow if it meant securing exactly what they hold right now. Previously, they wanted Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donbas, and Kharkiv—on top of ensuring Ukraine stays out of NATO (which was the stated reason for the invasion, though we all know imperial hunger is the real driver).
Volodymyr Zelenskyy offered to forgo NATO membership, but the Russian response was essentially: "Great, Ukraine has shown its willingness"—which translates to: "Now hand over the territory." Those hungry Russian bears just want their fill.
If we're being realistic: Russia withdraws from Ukraine, pays reparations, provides guarantees, and Ukraine commits to staying out of NATO.
But Russia won't move without guarantees—which really means they'll just wait 5 to 10 years before invading again. They just want a breather to regroup and strengthen.
Anyone remember Chechen history?😛They lost the first war, withdrew, and then attacked again a few years later to win the second.
As for the Ukrainians, if they could just stop being so uncompromising about Crimea... but unfortunately, that ship sailed a long time ago, and Russia isn't about to retreat because of the Black Sea Fleet.
Sure, it’s likely just more Russian *maskirovka*, but I think there might be something actually happening here....
DW News: German chancellor urges Putin to agree to ceasefire as counteroffensive advances
It looks like some quiet diplomacy has been happening behind the scenes.
And oh yeah, the biggest sticking point will be what I mentioned back in the spring during those first talks (the ones pro-Russian circles are now claiming were all settled before Boris Johnson showed up in Kyiv): security guarantees for Ukraine.
In my opinion, there are only two real, serious guarantees: either Russia collapses, or Ukraine becomes a nuclear power.
Edit:
Also, the fact that people are even discussing this suggests the situation inside Russia is much worse than they let on. It's showing in the military—I don't need to go into detail there—but also politically, with local politicians pushing back, and even in the media, where you see people questioning the war and the stance toward Ukraine during prime time.
A total reversal of the war isn't really on the table anymore. Even if the political will existed, it's probably too late for mobilization in Russia; training and equipping new recruits would take longer than the Russian army can actually sustain in Ukraine. That "famous" 3rd Army Corps seems to be doing little more than wandering around the rear in southern Ukraine; honestly, it looks like they're looking for ways to avoid combat rather than join it. This whole mess is the result of that big initiative to have every Russian region mobilize and equip its own volunteer battalion—which resulted in units that are only at one-third or half their supposed strength.
Hmm... Winter is Coming 😁
____