#6721 ·
Nicholas Perez7 said:That's exactly the point. Nobody in Europe, including Ukraine, is looking to occupy Russia. They just want to defend their own soil, and older generations can step up for that too. I was already 35 when I joined the service during the Gulf War, so I definitely wasn't exactly "young" back then.
You were defending the US at the absolute peak of your life—even during your physical prime—and that defense was largely carried by the generation born around the 1960s and 70s. Back then, those generations had enough men that even if some fell in combat, there was still a massive foundation left to carry on the population and keep things moving forward.
I’m a post-war baby, and in my generation, the numbers were also pretty high. In theory, my generation could actually step up and fight a war again, but we run into a major problem: nowadays, only a small fraction of my peers are actually having kids. Back in the day, guys your age would have easily had one, two, or three children minimum.
Then you look at my brother's generation—they're already seeing about 50% fewer births than mine (the 2000s crowd). If they were the ones called to go to war, you'd basically be looking at the total disappearance of that demographic, leaving behind an incredibly tiny number of people to sustain the future.