#7701 ·
Christian Torres3 said:Back in the early nineties, the US could have practically bought Russia for a handful of rice; they weren't exactly looking to spread democracy then. Instead, what they actually did was bankroll Yeltsin to stay in power. When Zyuganov was actually getting close to winning an election, they just sent over PR experts along with more loans to make sure Yeltsin pulled through.
Honestly? It might have been better if the US had just colonized them. At least then there’d be a real shot at developing a functional democracy one day. Instead, they just ended up stuck in this weird hybrid mess of charisma and communism.
Look, it’s one thing when the country you’re supposedly "bringing democracy to" is a nuclear superpower—the biggest one on the planet, no less—or somewhere like Iraq. They propped up Yeltsin just to ensure they kept control over the nation and its military. It would be absolutely lovely if they had actually installed democracy like they did in Iraq, Libya, or Syria... feel free to keep listing them.