The Danish Girl (2015)

Just gotta give Alicia her flowers here... She absolutely killed it on screen. 👍

granitetiger69 said:I guess I could try to make a case for it, but honestly, it’s hard to know where to start without more context. Maybe if you give me a specific topic or an idea to work with, I can weigh in. I'm not really one for long-winded debates, but I'll give it a shot if there's something to talk about. Just let me know.

Too heavy? I mean, what kind of drama is that if you're just... fine with it? ovo Too much? Maybe. 🕺

And this comment about The Danish Girl... 🤦 That stereotype that all Scandinavians are white as cheese... I guess it's a thing. 🤣 Vikander is actually a Swedish woman, I guess.

You haven't got a clue.
That smile and those facial expressions... they just hit the mark. It captures that whole feeling of trying to suppress who you really are. I guess it’s just spot on.

I thought this movie was just wonderful. Everything about it—the plot, how they handled the psychology of what Einar/Lili was going through, even the costumes and the sets... it was all great. And the acting? I don't know who I liked better, Alicia or Eddie. They just seemed to complement each other perfectly.

My only real gripe is that they didn't quite show the full reason behind her death. In reality, just like how it's portrayed in the movie, Lili wanted to fully transition into being a woman. She ended up passing away due to complications from her fourth surgery—an organ transplant—because her body rejected it, which led to heart failure and infections. I guess they just skipped over those details.

Honestly, it’s a great movie all around. That 6.8 on IMDb just doesn't seem right to me. I guess it deserves better.

Oh my God,🙄 how old are you, thirteen? If his facial expressions come across to me as repulsive, off-base, and exhausting, then that’s just my honest take. It wasn't "perfectly" acted; in fact, it wasn't even good, from what I can see. Most critics seem to be praising nothing but Alicia (and rightfully so)... and yeah, I think that rating actually makes sense because it mostly reflects the failed performance of the lead actor.

Justin Rogers5 said:Eddie and Lili Elbe look nothing alike. If you're going to paint such an important figure, at least try to make them resemble the actual person.
Way too heavy, way too depressing. I actually turned it off halfway through. It feels like it was just manufactured for an Oscar, and the acting is totally forced.

He completely missed the mark with this one... honestly, if it were just a matter of him being physically mismatched for the role, I could almost forgive it, but that’s not the issue here. If they had cast a more capable actor, someone who could actually command the screen through sheer expression, he could have compensated for any physical differences. It’s such a shame they didn't go with someone else. He might be riding a wave of hype right now, but let’s be real—he’s a flash in the pan. He won't stay relevant for long.

granitetiger69 said:Why though?
It’s not like this is the first or last time they cast someone who looks somewhat similar just because they're a great actor.
And honestly, there isn't a massive difference between how "real life Lili" looked and Eddie... facial features aren't really the point for the story being told.

All these comments about doing it for the Oscar are getting old, maybe even for 🥱

Because Eddie is a handsome guy with interesting features, while the real Lily was a balding man who would still look like a man even with a wig and makeup on. But I guess they had to do it, since nobody would pay to see a movie where Lily plays Danny DeVito. That whole makeup thing feels pointless to me.☕To ušminkavanje mi je bez veze.
there are huge differences
https://www.google.com/search?q=lily+...wIpw4s-SpNM%3A
http://www.historyvshollywood.com/re...s/danish-girl/
What kind of casting is this...

dustytinker52 said:Oh my God,🙄 how old are you, thirteen? If his facial expressions come across to me as repulsive, off-base, and exhausting, then that’s just my honest take. It wasn't "perfectly" acted; in fact, it wasn't even good, from what I can see. Most critics seem to be praising nothing but Alicia (and rightfully so)... and yeah, I think that rating actually makes sense because it mostly reflects the failed performance of the lead actor.

Nah, I'm only 12. 🥳

You can be whatever you want with me, honestly. It's all subjective anyway. I guess that's why we even have this forum, right?
If your absolute best comeback is basically saying "I'm only 13," after I just explained exactly why you're missing the point, then yeah... you aren't going to get very far on this forum. I guess.

I know some people in real Life Lily who struggle with their sexuality, and whenever they find themselves in an awkward spot—like when they seem out of place or just super insecure—they start smiling. I guess that's just how it goes. I guess I'm just here. Maybe I'll say something later. Man, Eddie really nailed those scenes. He was just so good at playing those situations.

Justin Rogers5 said:Because Eddie is a handsome guy with interesting features, while the real Lily was a balding man who would still look like a man even with a wig and makeup on. But I guess they had to do it, since nobody would pay to see a movie where Lily plays Danny DeVito. That whole makeup thing feels pointless to me.☕To ušminkavanje mi je bez veze.
there are huge differences
https://www.google.com/search?q=lily+...wIpw4s-SpNM%3A
http://www.historyvshollywood.com/re...s/danish-girl/
What kind of casting is this...

I guess I'm mostly on the same page as you. But honestly, Hollywood does this way too often:

Wolf from Wall Street
real Life Wolf vs. Leo

Erin Brockovich
real Life Erin vs real Life Joy vsJulia Roberts Alan Turing

Julia Roberts Alan Turing
real Life Alan vs vs. Benedict Cumberbatch

Joy (Mangano)
Real Life Joy vs. Jennifer Lawrence

I guess there are more examples like this.
For roles like these—where the actors weren't quite as globally famous back then that everyone knows exactly what they look like, sort of like how people recognize Picasso or Frida Kahlo—I'm totally fine if they don't nail the physical resemblance perfectly. I think it's okay to focus more on the costume design and the actual performance of the character instead.

Look, when you're adapting a movie about a famous historical figure, it’s almost impossible to nail the physical look every single time. If we demanded a perfect Cleopatra, people like Liz Taylor would be getting cast in every single role ☕😉
. I mean, it’s just unrealistic to expect some actor to be a carbon copy of Lily, pull off the performance perfectly, and still be someone everyone finds attractive or easy on the eyes. Makeup helps bridge the gap to make them look more like the original, but at the end of the day, I think the story, the person's life, and the actual characterization matter way more.

The only thing that really gets under my skin is when they mess with the source material—like when they take a dark-haired Natasha from "War and Peace" and cast a blonde Clémence Poésy instead. That’s what annoys me.

I haven't seen "The Danish Girl" yet, but I definitely plan to since Alicia Vikander seems interesting.

granitetiger69 said:Nah, I'm only 12. 🥳

You can be whatever you want with me, honestly. It's all subjective anyway. I guess that's why we even have this forum, right?
If your absolute best comeback is basically saying "I'm only 13," after I just explained exactly why you're missing the point, then yeah... you aren't going to get very far on this forum. I guess.

I know some people in real Life Lily who struggle with their sexuality, and whenever they find themselves in an awkward spot—like when they seem out of place or just super insecure—they start smiling. I guess that's just how it goes. I guess I'm just here. Maybe I'll say something later. Man, Eddie really nailed those scenes. He was just so good at playing those situations.

I guess I'm mostly on the same page as you. But honestly, Hollywood does this way too often:

Wolf from Wall Street
real Life Wolf vs. Leo

Erin Brockovich
real Life Erin vs real Life Joy vsJulia Roberts Alan Turing

Julia Roberts Alan Turing
real Life Alan vs vs. Benedict Cumberbatch

Joy (Mangano)
Real Life Joy vs. Jennifer Lawrence

I guess there are more examples like this.
For roles like these—where the actors weren't quite as globally famous back then that everyone knows exactly what they look like, sort of like how people recognize Picasso or Frida Kahlo—I'm totally fine if they don't nail the physical resemblance perfectly. I think it's okay to focus more on the costume design and the actual performance of the character instead.

😂 This is truly the pinnacle of everything... I’m actually putting this in my signature...😁

Redmayne's constant blinking throughout the entire movie 👎🙂👎

In my opinion, the movie would have been significantly better if they had actually stuck to the real facts of their lives instead of doing this.

Benjamin Sanchez5 said:Redmayne's constant blinking throughout the entire movie 👎🙂👎

I have some issues with that too. I can't tell if he's doing it because he's a man trying to mimic female expressions, or if he thought that would help convey Lily's personality emerging from a male body.
It’s not that the blinking and facial twitching drove me crazy, but there might be a bit too much of it. It really feels like a male interpretation of how a woman moves and expresses herself.🤔

Anyway...

I just finished watching it and I'm honestly impressed. Visually, it's stunning. The pacing is great; the two hours flew by. Comparing Alicia and Eddie, Alicia totally outshines him. Don't get me wrong, Eddie is good and believable, but Alicia practically became Gerda.
He did a solid job portraying Einar's duality and the struggle of identity and acceptance, but Alicia brought so many more layers—the shock, the denial, the eventual reconciliation, though never fully accepting Einar/Lily's identity. She only accepts it toward the end, right before losing them both.
That scene where he's in front of the mirror and observing the prostitute was great; you can really see Einar trying to grasp what it means to feel and experience a woman's body.
On the other hand, Gerda spends the entire film fighting against the loss of her husband through disbelief, fear, and anger.

If anyone deserves an Oscar, it's definitely Alicia Vikander.

Vikander walked away with the SAG Award 2016 for Best Supporting Actress.

Eric Hayes61 said:The story itself is pretty mediocre—it feels half-baked and never quite finds its footing. While the costume design and makeup are top-tier, Eddie is a bit much; that forced smile he carries through the whole movie gets grating after a while. On the other hand, Alicia Vikander delivers another solid performance, building on the momentum she had after Ex Machina. Ultimately, the film feels lukewarm and unpolished. It’ll probably limp to a decent opening weekend, but compared to Joy, it’s easily the weakest contender in the Oscar race.

Totally agree. It felt unprepared and didn't really hit me that hard... even when Lili. passed away, or during that last scene with the joke. I don't know 🕺
Eddie was mostly just irritating with those attempts at acting shy and awkward. Alicia was really good though 👍

I've been reading through some reviews and noticed they were pretty critical of it. Personally, I thought the movie was excellent, though I guess I don't quite get the backlash. It seems to me like people might have expected something miraculous given the subject matter, but what we saw on screen felt like a really honest portrayal of how things actually are. In a way, I know someone who went through a similar experience, and there wasn't much difference from what was depicted.

I liked the movie—not quite on the level of The King's Speech, but enough that I found myself Googling facts just to see what actually happened after the credits rolled.
Alicia was fantastic; she far outshone Eddie in my eyes. I didn't get the sense he was overacting at all—in fact, I actually had to squint to catch that supposed stuttering 🤷. But her emotional delivery? Completely natural. Honestly, I found myself more invested in her side of the conversation than his.

Also, the costume design was top-notch. I thoroughly enjoyed the visuals of the wardrobe 😁.

I definitely need to check this out, then maybe I'll write up my own review. Is it available to stream anywhere? It's already out of theaters here.👎

Excellent, Alicia was fantastic.👍

The movie wasn't anything special, but Alicia was truly incredible.
She deserves an Oscar.
Plus, she's gorgeous—that dark-skinned The Danish Girl is an interesting choice.

He wasn't bad either, but his performance felt, how should I put it, a bit too much like he was just following instructions.

Such an incredibly moving film 🙂...it really stayed with me. The screenplay was brilliant, Eddie was top-notch, and Alicia was absolutely superb. This is easily the definitive performance portraying Hawking, especially since he spends half the movie essentially playing the role of a background extra.

Killer movie. 😢

It's a tough watch, but honestly? A total must-see. Especially if you're into heavy dramas.

Done. 😍

Last Night, I Had The most Beautiful dream. Dreamed I was just a tiny baby, tucked right in my mom's arms. She looks down at me, smiles, and calls me Lili.

Eric Hayes61 said:I honestly feel like Redmayne is overrated. Just because he snagged an Oscar for playing someone with a chronic illness doesn't automatically make him a top-tier actor. Honestly, aiming for an Oscar this year by playing a transgender character feels like a really cheap move on his part.

Let him play someone who isn't sick, disabled, or gay, and then we can actually judge what kind of actor he is.

Look, in this case, you'd call it queer. Gay and trans are two totally different things. Period. 😉

I caught that movie, and honestly, I wasn't really feeling it. I'd give it a 6/10. 🤔 🤷