Can food be "energetically" contaminated?
in Health ·
Anthony Bailey said:Hehe. 😁
And another thing.
Bon Appétit to that...
😁 😁
Anthony Bailey
By the way, is that actually a comment on the topic?
Don't spam the thread! 👎
136 posts shown.
Anthony Bailey said:Hehe. 😁
And another thing.
Bon Appétit to that...
😁 😁
Amanda Morris30 said:Sure thing.
...everything around us picks up on outside energy (on top of having its own), including food. If we grow, prep, or even eat it while feeling negative, it definitely loses its flavor and aroma... though it doesn't just turn toxic out of nowhere (unless someone adds actual poison. 😉..but that’s more like something from Agatha Christie 🙂)
hollowviper72 said:Essentially, we're debating something that actually leaves behind physical traces.
Alexander Parker69 said:I think it's possible.
There is such a huge difference when you eat out versus eating something homemade, even if the restaurant food is tasty. It just never hits the same way.
You can actually sense the mood someone was in while they were making it. Like, did they cook it through a smartphone app, or were they angry? Or maybe someone was cooking with passion...
Is it energy, or is it just that a person puts more effort in when they love what they do...
velvetranger10 said:How much does genetics matter versus the soul,
when trying to settle in God's kingdom
or when we're searching for our true selves?😕
illegale said:Rebecca Miller2. I don't quite follow the question. Are you asking if having equal rights is different from being treated equally?
strider2 said:Too much KNOWLEDGE here! Seriously, folks, did you not realize men are the ones giving birth? That whole deception is just claiming women have wombs—in reality, men carry them...😁 😁
Mr. Lukić, your knowledge is simply too vast for this world. This is right up there with your theories about the Earth being flat....😁 🙂
wearyowl29 said:Whenever you say # shalom # to Lukić Shala, it sounds like an attempt to revive
the Holocaust.😁
wearyowl29 said:Shalom, Lukić Shala🙂
Calling all "philosophers" out there! Let me know what you think. Is this the same thing?
I've been chatting with a few people lately... just looking for some clarity on definitions.
For example: the whole idea of women's "equality." Does "having rights" mean the exact same thing as "equality"? Based on how I see language and logic—it doesn't!
To clarify: do women have all the rights? They do!
But when certain groups—feminists and activists—use the term "equality," their constant political bickering makes it seem like they aren't actually talking about *that* kind of equality.
So, what are they actually after?
Are they seeking some kind of superiority under the guise of "equality"?
Hmm... put you guys on the spot, didn't I?
Thanks🙂
Nemruth Dag said:WISHING ALL HONEST JEWS
SHABBAT SHALOM
And Lukić, you're definitely getting a one-way ticket to the psych ward.
Nemruth Dag said:Just when you think there’s no way for Rebecca Miller2 to sink any lower...
you realize deep down that Jews are just inherently flawed.
Matthew Doyle73 said:Smart people become scientists—not because they are Jewish, but despite being Jewish.
Jews have always been great scientists and doctors; you'd know that if you didn't just quote their intense, wise writings. Genetics did the rest.
Why don't you try being a scientist if you think you could do better than some Jews?
me!i!i!i- said:Just like a century ago: Scientists 😛
Matthew Doyle73 said:They’d probably roll out some ridiculous "manliness test" and wouldn't complain a bit... unless they failed that too. 😛 😛 😛
Blaise said:Alright then, what exactly are you dreaming about and who do you think you're settling scores with?
Roger Hall15 said:😁 😁 I’m over here talking about trucks and cars, while you're stuck on psych tests! 😁 😁
Oh, I see where you're coming from now.
But what about those unattractive women who just can't leverage their sexuality?
Roger Hall15 said:Nature doesn't necessarily dictate everything. In the natural world, things just fall into place. But society plays a role too. In my view, legal rights and social equality—as defined by society at large—don't always align. So, the real question is: why, to whom, and what kind of rights? Should we even be discussing this?