CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › cosmicmoose2 › Posts

Posts by cosmicmoose2

189 posts shown.

I’ve got a hunch you’re a Ferrari fan now. Used to be all about Max...
Which is totally fine by me, honestly. No need to hide it.
And look, if someone says Ferrari has the second-best car when it comes to Race Pace, that isn't an insult to the machine or the geniuses who built it. It's just facts.
That car was definitely the beast on the grid early on, but Red Bull has been cranking out upgrades left and right... and you can really see the difference in those last six or seven races.
Brian Garcia24 said:I honestly don't know what people are looking at if they have working eyes. Ferrari dominates qualifying, sure, but they’re better in the race too. Ferrari has had the better pace in practically every single race this season. Seriously, if they hadn't dealt with breakdowns, driver errors, or strategic blunders, Ferrari would have literally won EVERY race this season. In every single race where Max took the win, one of those three things—or a mix of them—handed him the victory, while the car's raw pace was always on Ferrari's side. It’s unbelievable how anyone can miss that.
So, look: Sainz wins in the United Kingdom, then Leclerc takes wins in Australia and Bahrain. In Canada, Sainz is breathing down Max's neck, clearly faster, but just can't get past... plus the SC probably screwed him over too. Leclerc isn't even in the running because of component changes (if he were, Max definitely wouldn't be able to hold off both of them). Then there's Azerbaijan with both Ferraris breaking down, Monaco with those tragic strategic calls and terrible communication, and Spain where Leclerc's engine failed (thanks to Team Management). Miami saw a Leclerc error and Max overtaking, then Saudi Arabia was a scrap between Max and Leclerc with a few mistakes from Leclerc (that's the race where Red Bull was closest). And don't forget Italy, where Max does his usual thing dominating in the rain, while both Ferraris have desperate starts, Sainz gets unlucky, and Leclerc gets stuck behind a McLaren before being visibly faster than Perez but then messing up and losing everything. That's all the races right there! Maybe one or two where the pace was equal or Red Bull was slightly quicker, but Ferrari was faster in the vast majority of races.

Ferrari had an edge at the start of the season. Their last race where they actually had a significant advantage in the race was Australia. Though, before that, there was Saudi Arabia where straight-line speed is the deciding factor, and back then, Red Bull was miles ahead of Ferrari in top speed.

Since then, every single race (not qualifying, I mean actual races) has belonged to Red Bull, so you're dead wrong if you claim Ferrari has been stronger all season. It's the exact opposite. Look, Max is a hell of a driver, nobody's disputing that. But the car accounts for at least 60% of the success.
When you throw strategy and pit stop speed into the mix—like others have already pointed out—plus the fact that Ferrari keeps breaking down, you get that massive gap in the points standings.

It seems to me that some Red Bull fans, like yourself, aren't satisfied just seeing their driver win; they only value a victory if it's a "David vs. Goliath" situation. That's why every single season you push this narrative that Max is winning in an inferior car.

Max didn't even have an inferior car last year (maybe at the very end of the season when Mercedes pushed their engines to the limit), and he definitely doesn't have an inferior car this year.

This year, his path to the title is the easiest it's ever been. Partly because of the car, and partly because of Ferrari itself. If he somehow manages to lose this championship, it's entirely on him.
If things don't get messy right at the start tomorrow, we're in for a total snooze fest. Red Bull's pace on this track is just way too much...
Sainz was looking pretty good out there, but let's be real, he clearly isn't matching Leclerc's pace. Tomorrow could be a headache, at least during the opening laps, until Leclerc can finally break out of the DRS train.
Drew Bennett68 said:They wiped out almost all of Brian Perez79's time slots... he's starting P13. This is gonna be wild.

Look, since they’re running a sprint, this is actually his big chance to claw back into the spot he "should" have had after qualifying anyway. The sting of a bad qualifying session just isn't as brutal in this format...
Man, did you guys see how Max Verstappen's fans were celebrating when Lewis Hamilton crashed? Seriously... talk about being cutthroat against the English...
Can we please get some actual balance here? There’s way too much stuff focused on "women and the LGBTQ+ community," and let's be real, they definitely aren't the main demographic following Formula 1😁
ruggedscout76 said:Look, look, I just had to get them all in a row first... 🤣

image

Call me right now! 🤣
British GP (Silverstone) | July 1–3, 2022 in Formula 1 ·
graniteharbor502 said:Even according to Palmer's breakdown on this...


And even he thinks Russell takes the biggest blame for the crash.
Well, yeah, he does. But look, it was just a mess in the pack right at the start, before turn one. Nobody got seriously hurt, and Russell had to pay the price himself by getting knocked out of the race. Regardless of who's actually at fault here, I don't think it was a situation that called for a penalty...

Jelena Veljača would probably claim he got away with it just because he's a privileged white guy.
British GP (Silverstone) | July 1–3, 2022 in Formula 1 ·
George Johnson24 said:I bet he stopped and ran over to Zhou because he felt guilty or something.

For sure he did. But honestly, that doesn't mean he wouldn't have done it anyway. Even Callum Ilott mentioned after his crash that Russell helped clear a go-kart off him while he was flipping over... so it might not always be some calculated, fake move.
Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
So, when is that new decision about scrapping the parent-caregiver measure actually hitting the City Council floor?
British GP (Silverstone) | July 1–3, 2022 in Formula 1 ·
Sam Clark75 said:Whether there's a number one or number two driver... honestly, if Ferrari can't even figure out how to manage their own roster, that's a much bigger mess than who gets priority...

I get what you're saying, really I do, but I actually think Ferrari would benefit from having a clear hierarchy, mostly because they're so notoriously bad at juggling two drivers at once...
Especially if they actually want a shot at the championship against Red Bull Racing, who actually knows how to run a team without the internal chaos...
British GP (Silverstone) | July 1–3, 2022 in Formula 1 ·
graniteharbor502 said:Neither the Ferrari crew nor their drivers have what it takes to actually win a championship. A match made in hell, if you ask me.

And I’d just add—if they even had the guts to say it out loud.
British GP (Silverstone) | July 1–3, 2022 in Formula 1 ·
Roger Wright94 said:They say a picture is worth a thousand words, right? Here...

image

Look, props to Sainz. I really like him as a driver, and since I’m pulling for Ferrari, I’m naturally pulling for him too. But let’s be real here... Leclerc is clearly the faster guy. He kills it in qualifying, he dominates the races, and he’s got more wins under his belt—even when he was paired up with a four-time world champ. So, if we're talking about who actually deserves the shot at a title with Ferrari? It's gotta be Leclerc. Plain and simple.
British GP (Silverstone) | July 1–3, 2022 in Formula 1 ·
So, how exactly did Ferrari favor Charles Leclerc? Is it just because they don't have the guts to actually pull off team orders like Red Bull or Mercedes? Or even the "old school" Ferrari from back in the Schumacher and Barrichello days?
By leaving him stuck on those hards right at the end of the race while deciding to give Sainz the advantage of the fresher, softer tires?
The only thing Sainz has over Charles Leclerc is a better sense of strategy from inside the cockpit. When it comes to that, Leclerc is way too passive and leans way too hard on Ferrari. If he were driving for Red Bull or Mercedes, maybe he could get away with it, but with these specific strategists? No way.

The whole point wasn't that Sainz isn't allowed to be first... the point is that Ferrari fans could have been celebrating a 1-2 finish if they had just executed a decent double stack. But no, Ferrari claims there just wasn't enough time. All that crucial time was wasted on making excuses.
And then what? Should Sainz be the number one driver just because he finally grabbed his first win after nearly 150 races?
British GP (Silverstone) | July 1–3, 2022 in Formula 1 ·
swiftmaker12 said:Even though Charles Leclerc was clearly the faster driver, I just don't get Scuderia Ferrari's strategy.
Sainz let Charles Leclerc through on lap 31, and by lap 39—right when Esteban Ocon triggered the SC—Charles Leclerc had already built a 5-second gap. That’s half a second faster per lap!
And then these absolute idiots don't even bring him in for tires? They just leave him out there grinding on hards... unbelievable.

From what I gathered, the folks at Ferrari were claiming they couldn't pull off a double stack. What a load of garbage. If Charles Leclerc was faster—which he totally was—he would have built up more than enough of a cushion to make a double stack work perfectly without having to sweat those ten laps and chase down target times. Just ridiculous...
British GP (Silverstone) | July 1–3, 2022 in Formula 1 ·
I’ve been watching the replays too, and honestly, even with the halo, it’s a freaking miracle Guanyu Zhou walked away from that without a scratch.
British GP (Silverstone) | July 1–3, 2022 in Formula 1 ·
wanderingharbor492 said:Look, I hate to say it, but nobody seems to get that Carlos Sainz was basically babysitting Charles Leclerc for 15 laps just so he could use that DRS during the first stint. Leclerc was dealing with a damaged front wing, for crying out loud.

He wasn't "babysitting" him! While Leclerc was leading, his gap over Sainz was actually widening even before they told Sainz to watch his fuel consumption...

I'm happy for Sainz, really, he earned it, but man... they could have handled this better so Charles at least walked away with second or a spot on the podium.
British GP (Silverstone) | July 1–3, 2022 in Formula 1 ·
wanderingharbor492 said:Wait, when was he even struggling?

In both stints! He was crawling on both mediums and hards while Lewis Hamilton was breathing down his neck...
British GP (Silverstone) | July 1–3, 2022 in Formula 1 ·
And honestly, Sergio Perez deserved a penalty for that move back onto the track and forcing Charles Leclerc off at the same time. Just ridiculous...
British GP (Silverstone) | July 1–3, 2022 in Formula 1 ·
wanderingharbor492 said:How on earth is someone who’s driving for them—and clearly has about two brain cells left to rub together—supposed to manage their pit strategies?

Look, I get strategy being about pit stops and tire compounds, but there's no way Carlos Sainz Jr. can just sit behind Charles Leclerc for ten laps straight if he doesn't have the pace... especially when Lewis Hamilton is breathing down their necks right behind them.
In those situations, you swap them. Period. You switch positions and then maybe try to win them back later if it makes sense.
And another thing! If you know the hard tires need five or six laps just to reach operating temperature, you can't just leave a driver stranded on them at the very end of the race. It's common sense... seriously.