Psoriasis [PLEASE READ FIRST POST!]
in Health ·
Since when is Zillow considered greasy?? How on earth are you even using it for hair styling? Instead of gel? 😕
Home ›
swiftscout8 › Posts
Posts by swiftscout8
237 posts shown.
Psoriasis [PLEASE READ FIRST POST!]
in Health ·
urbansailor68 said:Are you talking about that Neutrogena T-Gel? (Don't even get me started on the smell 🙄), but I'm pretty sure CVS has been stocking a bunch of different versions lately. It feels like there used to be just that one stinky 🙄 option back in the day. If anyone actually needs it, do your homework first. That shampoo was legitimately effective, though.
Now I'm second-guessing myself. It came in a clear plastic bottle, and the liquid itself was brownish. I really ought to double-check. You certainly don't forget a scent like that.
Sunday shifts?
in Economy ·
So, a few nights ago, I was sitting around with some coworkers debating this exact topic:
1) The whole concept is discriminatory and fundamentally flawed. If you implement Sunday closing laws, you have to apply them across the board. That means no trains, no buses, no ambulances, no phones, no TV—nothing. The entire country grinds to a halt and everyone stays home. We all know that’s impossible in practice. Therefore, the very premise of banning Sunday work is logically broken.
2) At the end of the day, people have freedom of choice. If you don't want to work on Sunday, find a job where you won't have to. If an employer tells you they need you for both Saturday and Sunday, they aren't asking for 40 hours anymore; they're asking for 56. But they’ll pay you $500 more for it. Whether you accept those terms is entirely up to you. I knew a waitress once who worked four shifts for $600. She eventually snapped, quit, and took a job at a local diner where she works every single damn day of the week for $933. When I asked her why she made the switch, she told me those extra $333 meant everything to her, and she preferred them over having 8 extra hours of free time. Bottom line: if someone doesn't want to work Sundays, they should find another job instead of whining about a smaller paycheck.
3) Then there’s the Labor Law. Its purpose is to ensure fairness in the employer-employee relationship. It sets the standards for those who don't have the power to negotiate their own working conditions. If the Labor Law states that Sunday work earns 200% more than a regular weekday, then that worker must receive that 200% bump. This is where I see Jeremy Flores10's point. If you are forced to work on Sunday because your boss demands it, then it makes sense to treat it as a special case. And that is exactly what needs to be regulated by the Labor Law and enforced by Labor Inspection. Honestly, what's stopping you from reporting your boss... anonymously? Just don't play both sides while the inspectors are walking through the door pretending everything is great.
I caught a Democratic Party member talking about this issue the other night. I have to admit, I agree with her on almost every point.
1) The whole concept is discriminatory and fundamentally flawed. If you implement Sunday closing laws, you have to apply them across the board. That means no trains, no buses, no ambulances, no phones, no TV—nothing. The entire country grinds to a halt and everyone stays home. We all know that’s impossible in practice. Therefore, the very premise of banning Sunday work is logically broken.
2) At the end of the day, people have freedom of choice. If you don't want to work on Sunday, find a job where you won't have to. If an employer tells you they need you for both Saturday and Sunday, they aren't asking for 40 hours anymore; they're asking for 56. But they’ll pay you $500 more for it. Whether you accept those terms is entirely up to you. I knew a waitress once who worked four shifts for $600. She eventually snapped, quit, and took a job at a local diner where she works every single damn day of the week for $933. When I asked her why she made the switch, she told me those extra $333 meant everything to her, and she preferred them over having 8 extra hours of free time. Bottom line: if someone doesn't want to work Sundays, they should find another job instead of whining about a smaller paycheck.
3) Then there’s the Labor Law. Its purpose is to ensure fairness in the employer-employee relationship. It sets the standards for those who don't have the power to negotiate their own working conditions. If the Labor Law states that Sunday work earns 200% more than a regular weekday, then that worker must receive that 200% bump. This is where I see Jeremy Flores10's point. If you are forced to work on Sunday because your boss demands it, then it makes sense to treat it as a special case. And that is exactly what needs to be regulated by the Labor Law and enforced by Labor Inspection. Honestly, what's stopping you from reporting your boss... anonymously? Just don't play both sides while the inspectors are walking through the door pretending everything is great.
I caught a Democratic Party member talking about this issue the other night. I have to admit, I agree with her on almost every point.
Psoriasis [PLEASE READ FIRST POST!]
in Health ·
I’ve tried just about everything under the sun. Looking back, some things offered a bit of relief, while others were an absolute waste of time.
The only real solution is to accept it for what it is and stop letting the people around you push you around. It can be a nasty, infuriating reality, but at some point, you just have to come to terms with it.
The only real solution is to accept it for what it is and stop letting the people around you push you around. It can be a nasty, infuriating reality, but at some point, you just have to come to terms with it.
Psoriasis [PLEASE READ FIRST POST!]
in Health ·
placidbadger10 said:Thnx😉, thank God. I’ve got very little going on—nothing on my face or body except for my elbows and scalp, and even then, thank God, it isn't too terrible. It mostly just looks like dry skin on my elbows, and on my scalp... it's a bit worse, almost like dandruff, but in tiny little bumps. (And then I end up picking at them with my nails... grrr.)🙄
For my scalp, I found a shampoo abroad that works wonders. I'm not sure if they carry it here in the States, but Terzolin has been great for me!
You can actually find a shampoo here called Uriage Sqaphane. They have two versions, T and P. I'm not entirely sure which one I use, but I think it's the P type. It basically acts similarly to Terzolin, or even Oronazol. Like I said, it's just one way to manage symptoms. These shampoos can clear away a psoriasis plaque, but they don't touch the inflammation underneath, so you're still left with the thickening and redness.
There was this one coal tar shampoo that was absolutely stellar. Honestly, it worked better for me than anything else. You used to be able to pick it up easily at local markets in cities like Chicago, but it's hard to find now: Neutrogena. Warning though: the smell is atrocious. You'll spend the whole day smelling like someone is burning rubber right next to you.
Generally speaking, the best combo for the scalp is a lotion made by Johnson & Johnson called Belosalic (it’s a mix of corticosteroids and salicylic acid). It’s incredibly unpleasant—it stings because of the acid—but it’s hands down the best thing I've ever tried. You can even get it without a prescription. Apply it twice a day. The upside is that it isn't greasy and evaporates quickly, so you can actually use it in your hair.
There's also a gel that's a total newcomer to this field. Personally, it did absolutely nothing for me; while it cleared the plaque, the inflammation in those spots actually flared up even more. The gel is called Zorac or Tazorac, but it isn't available here yet. It has one annoying side effect: once you apply the gel, do not go to the dermatologist for a UV light exam, or you'll end up glowing like an alien.
Psoriasis [PLEASE READ FIRST POST!]
in Health ·
placidbadger10 said:Has anyone here actually managed to cure psoriasis? Or maybe you know someone who did... even if it was just for a while?
It’s possible to go years without a flare-up.
I live with this, and no, it has never truly gone away. You get stretches where it isn't that bad—times when you don't even need treatment—but then there are those awful phases where it gets disgusting. You apply your meds, it clears up, and then two weeks later, you're right back where you started.
It never lasts more than a month. After three weeks, the patches start creeping back.
Sorry. It sucks, but you really just have to accept it and do everything in your power to keep it under control. If someone notices, just be upfront about it. Explain what's going on and move on.
P.S. I’ve got spots on my face, too. So, for now, just be glad yours is relatively localized. 🙏 👋
Psoriasis [PLEASE READ FIRST POST!]
in Health ·
Another incurable skin condition. If you've been diagnosed, you just have to accept that this is your reality for the foreseeable future—unless, of course, someone finally stumbles upon a real cure.
Everything else we're talking about here is nothing more than symptomatic treatment.
Everything else we're talking about here is nothing more than symptomatic treatment.
Side effects?
in Health ·
Joshua Chavez said:Just wanted to fix a quote there. Beer actually contains hops, which act as a sedative, not valerian. Maybe a little hop "tea" would do her some good? 😁
Hops. Right. How unexpected. 😕
As far as I'm aware, beer isn't brewed exclusively from hops. 😕
Side effects?
in Health ·
You can find some stuff at the pharmacy—what was it called... mostly valerian root tea, if I’m remembering correctly. You even see it added to certain beers sometimes. It knocks you out cold. Give it a shot; it might actually help.
Brown discharge
in Women's Health ·
Emily Phillips16 said:well, that's why I'm only 15 😉
That changes things. 🙏Go find a decent job and stay out of trouble.
Side effects?
in Health ·
Just have a Joe before you hit the sack and you'll see how quickly everything settles down. Just stop chewing on those anti-neurotics and other similar garbage. The less chemicals, the better.
Brown discharge
in Women's Health ·
Emily Phillips16 said:and I know it isn't some kind of STD,
Then you’re still a virgin. And if you aren't... then it’s definitely gonorrhea. Guaranteed. 🙂
Damaged nasal lining
in Health ·
Lately, my nasal passages have been giving me hell. It’s this intense stinging sensation combined with constant dryness that tends to linger for a few days at a time. On top of that, I'm dealing with excessive congestion—my nose feels stuffed up almost constantly. Strangely enough, though, I can still breathe perfectly fine without any obstruction.
It’s baffling because I haven't touched a single nasal spray or anything remotely similar recently. If memory serves, I’ve probably used nose drops maybe three or four times in the last decade. I don't have issues with allergies, vision, sinuses, or anything else that usually links back to nasal irritation.
I don't feel like this warrants a trip to the doctor just yet, but it’s getting incredibly annoying. Anyone else dealt with something like this?
It’s baffling because I haven't touched a single nasal spray or anything remotely similar recently. If memory serves, I’ve probably used nose drops maybe three or four times in the last decade. I don't have issues with allergies, vision, sinuses, or anything else that usually links back to nasal irritation.
I don't feel like this warrants a trip to the doctor just yet, but it’s getting incredibly annoying. Anyone else dealt with something like this?
The impact of power lines and substations
in Health ·
boldsailor32 said:Dealing with radars pushing 1 MW pulse power at 3.5 GHz? Honestly, I’m just relieved to be staying far away from that kind of setup lately.
I feel the same way. With that much power, you could practically cook your eyes if you get too close.
P.S. It feels like everyone here is out looking for witches to burn. You're all hunting for some groundbreaking new way EM fields interact with matter. Maybe you'll stumble onto gunpowder. Who knows!? 😁 Perhaps EM radiation acts on the soul in ways we haven't even realized yet. Or maybe we're all just remote-controlled robots, and substation radiation is nothing more than signal interference. 😂
👋
The impact of power lines and substations
in Health ·
Kate Diaz 👍
What exactly is EM radiation? It’s simply any combination of electric and magnetic fields. There is always a source behind it. But that isn't really the point here—the real question everyone asks is whether EM radiation is actually harmful. If you ask me, most scientists approach this specific question with far more caution than is actually necessary.
Theoretically, we already know certain types of radiation are harmful. However, we’re still stuck in this endless loop of testing and statistical trials, all just to prove that this damage falls within what they call "normal" limits. That’s exactly where we stand today with cell phones.
Once again, we’re seeing theoretical proofs claiming radiation isn't harmful, yet they spend all their energy desperately hunting for evidence to prove otherwise.
Every wire emits radiation. You have electric and magnetic fields at play here. The electric field is a consequence of voltage, while the magnetic field stems from the current. With direct current, the electric field moves along the conductor, which means you're dealing with a magnetic field that can actually be measured outside the wire.
Alternating current creates an electric field that can—and absolutely will—extend beyond the conductor. When you pair that with a magnetic field, you're looking at electromagnetic radiation. It’s worth digging into this if you want to understand what's actually driving the skin effect.
How much radiation are we actually talking about here? It’s not a simple number. It all comes down to frequency and current.
This means the cord on your nightlight is emitting radiation too, but you haven't bothered to worry about it because the levels are so negligible they aren't even worth a debate. We’re talking about 50Hz systems here, which is exactly what that substation under discussion uses. So, what's the actual difference between a wire powering a nightlight and a transformer station? It comes down to the load—the current—not the voltage. That 30kV external voltage just tells you the substation covers a larger area, meaning it carries a much heavier load than anything on a low-voltage grid. Even though it’s a closed electrical system, the EM radiation from a substation like that is significantly stronger than what you'd get from a low-voltage unit.
So, should we actually be worried about this kind of radiation? If you want an answer, you just have to look at the nature of electromagnetic radiation itself. EM radiation functions in two distinct ways. The photoelectric effect introduced the world to the particle nature of EM radiation. It directly describes certain phenomena that occur during interaction (just look up the photoelectric effect). The energy of an EM quantum increases alongside its frequency. Simply put: higher frequency means higher quantum energy. Take the photoelectric effect as an example: light is used to eject an electron from a Zinc atom. What frequency range are we talking about for that light? We’re looking at the THz range. Meanwhile, here we are discussing 50Hz. Just compare the frequencies and the quantum energy levels of these two types of EM radiation and see for yourself.
So, it turns out light still isn't actually harmful to the human body. We’ve evolved our own built-in defenses against that kind of radiation.
It’s worth looking at two distinct scenarios here: one where we have a confirmed case that could actually be harmful, versus the situation you're describing.
Think about a covalent bond. It’s what holds two non-metal atoms together by sharing an electron. Now, imagine you hit that molecule with radiation intense enough to knock out that specific shared electron. At that exact moment, the molecule ceases to exist. Apply that same logic to DNA. It is quite literally the worst-case scenario.
There’s another, more straightforward scenario where a quick burst of EM radiation disrupts an atom. If you look at the Bohr model, you can see how a single quantum can nudge an electron from one shell to the next. The ionization case—where the electron is kicked completely out of the valence shell—is just a specific, extreme version of this. Because the atom is now in an unnatural, agitated state, it naturally tries to stabilize itself. It wants that electron back in its original position. Eventually, the electron settles back down, but in that process, it releases energy in the form of heat. Of course, it isn't quite that simple. To get the full picture, you really need to dive into materials physics. But there’s your explanation for microwaves and cell phone radiation.
At the end of the day, we’re talking about an electromagnetic quantum that actually possesses enough energy to trigger a reaction. Everything else is just noise; it doesn't affect matter at all. If a quantum lacks the necessary energy, the atom isn't even going to receive it. It’s the same basic principle as a key trying to fit into a lock.
So, what exactly makes something harmful? It’s the radio waves. If you crank up the current frequency and open up a conductor—essentially turning it into an antenna—you end up radiating electromagnetic waves. We know this because we can use shortwave frequencies to communicate with another continent. That proves these emissions are powerful enough to impact the surrounding environment. At frequencies between 3-30 MHz, a mere 100W of effective radiated power (ERP) is enough to send a signal from the US all the way to Australia. That’s unsettling. Yet, somehow, it’s still considered "insufficient" to be deemed harmful. Of course, at higher power levels, the same thing happens.
When we talk about cell phones, we’re looking at frequencies in the 1GHz-3GHz range, with power outputs measured in milliwatts. Harmful? It's certainly much more intense than a transformer station running at 50Hz. And yet, people carry these devices just centimeters away from their brains while they're running at full capacity. We are *still* investigating the actual risks of these devices. But hey, big business needs to keep making money, right?
There. A little scientific perspective on the transformer station issue.😁 Critiques are welcome.😁
What exactly is EM radiation? It’s simply any combination of electric and magnetic fields. There is always a source behind it. But that isn't really the point here—the real question everyone asks is whether EM radiation is actually harmful. If you ask me, most scientists approach this specific question with far more caution than is actually necessary.
Theoretically, we already know certain types of radiation are harmful. However, we’re still stuck in this endless loop of testing and statistical trials, all just to prove that this damage falls within what they call "normal" limits. That’s exactly where we stand today with cell phones.
Once again, we’re seeing theoretical proofs claiming radiation isn't harmful, yet they spend all their energy desperately hunting for evidence to prove otherwise.
Every wire emits radiation. You have electric and magnetic fields at play here. The electric field is a consequence of voltage, while the magnetic field stems from the current. With direct current, the electric field moves along the conductor, which means you're dealing with a magnetic field that can actually be measured outside the wire.
Alternating current creates an electric field that can—and absolutely will—extend beyond the conductor. When you pair that with a magnetic field, you're looking at electromagnetic radiation. It’s worth digging into this if you want to understand what's actually driving the skin effect.
How much radiation are we actually talking about here? It’s not a simple number. It all comes down to frequency and current.
This means the cord on your nightlight is emitting radiation too, but you haven't bothered to worry about it because the levels are so negligible they aren't even worth a debate. We’re talking about 50Hz systems here, which is exactly what that substation under discussion uses. So, what's the actual difference between a wire powering a nightlight and a transformer station? It comes down to the load—the current—not the voltage. That 30kV external voltage just tells you the substation covers a larger area, meaning it carries a much heavier load than anything on a low-voltage grid. Even though it’s a closed electrical system, the EM radiation from a substation like that is significantly stronger than what you'd get from a low-voltage unit.
So, should we actually be worried about this kind of radiation? If you want an answer, you just have to look at the nature of electromagnetic radiation itself. EM radiation functions in two distinct ways. The photoelectric effect introduced the world to the particle nature of EM radiation. It directly describes certain phenomena that occur during interaction (just look up the photoelectric effect). The energy of an EM quantum increases alongside its frequency. Simply put: higher frequency means higher quantum energy. Take the photoelectric effect as an example: light is used to eject an electron from a Zinc atom. What frequency range are we talking about for that light? We’re looking at the THz range. Meanwhile, here we are discussing 50Hz. Just compare the frequencies and the quantum energy levels of these two types of EM radiation and see for yourself.
So, it turns out light still isn't actually harmful to the human body. We’ve evolved our own built-in defenses against that kind of radiation.
It’s worth looking at two distinct scenarios here: one where we have a confirmed case that could actually be harmful, versus the situation you're describing.
Think about a covalent bond. It’s what holds two non-metal atoms together by sharing an electron. Now, imagine you hit that molecule with radiation intense enough to knock out that specific shared electron. At that exact moment, the molecule ceases to exist. Apply that same logic to DNA. It is quite literally the worst-case scenario.
There’s another, more straightforward scenario where a quick burst of EM radiation disrupts an atom. If you look at the Bohr model, you can see how a single quantum can nudge an electron from one shell to the next. The ionization case—where the electron is kicked completely out of the valence shell—is just a specific, extreme version of this. Because the atom is now in an unnatural, agitated state, it naturally tries to stabilize itself. It wants that electron back in its original position. Eventually, the electron settles back down, but in that process, it releases energy in the form of heat. Of course, it isn't quite that simple. To get the full picture, you really need to dive into materials physics. But there’s your explanation for microwaves and cell phone radiation.
At the end of the day, we’re talking about an electromagnetic quantum that actually possesses enough energy to trigger a reaction. Everything else is just noise; it doesn't affect matter at all. If a quantum lacks the necessary energy, the atom isn't even going to receive it. It’s the same basic principle as a key trying to fit into a lock.
So, what exactly makes something harmful? It’s the radio waves. If you crank up the current frequency and open up a conductor—essentially turning it into an antenna—you end up radiating electromagnetic waves. We know this because we can use shortwave frequencies to communicate with another continent. That proves these emissions are powerful enough to impact the surrounding environment. At frequencies between 3-30 MHz, a mere 100W of effective radiated power (ERP) is enough to send a signal from the US all the way to Australia. That’s unsettling. Yet, somehow, it’s still considered "insufficient" to be deemed harmful. Of course, at higher power levels, the same thing happens.
When we talk about cell phones, we’re looking at frequencies in the 1GHz-3GHz range, with power outputs measured in milliwatts. Harmful? It's certainly much more intense than a transformer station running at 50Hz. And yet, people carry these devices just centimeters away from their brains while they're running at full capacity. We are *still* investigating the actual risks of these devices. But hey, big business needs to keep making money, right?
There. A little scientific perspective on the transformer station issue.😁 Critiques are welcome.😁
The impact of power lines and substations
in Health ·
Since I already know where this is headed, I’d love to hear the "expert" reasons why anyone would avoid buying an apartment next to a substation.
It seems some people here haven't the slightest clue what an electromagnetic field actually is, the different types that exist, or how they interact with the human body. For context, even X-rays are electromagnetic fields.
My stance is simple: a substation is harmless and has zero impact on the health of nearby residents—whether they're awake or asleep. Especially a medium-voltage 30kV unit.
But fine, let's hear the other side first. Why on earth do you think it's so dangerous??
P.S. This falls into that classic category: we demand constant electrical power because every household adds three new gadgets a year, yet we refuse to deal with power plants, nuclear facilities, hydro dams, or wind farms because it rains too much. 😂 😂
It seems some people here haven't the slightest clue what an electromagnetic field actually is, the different types that exist, or how they interact with the human body. For context, even X-rays are electromagnetic fields.
My stance is simple: a substation is harmless and has zero impact on the health of nearby residents—whether they're awake or asleep. Especially a medium-voltage 30kV unit.
But fine, let's hear the other side first. Why on earth do you think it's so dangerous??
P.S. This falls into that classic category: we demand constant electrical power because every household adds three new gadgets a year, yet we refuse to deal with power plants, nuclear facilities, hydro dams, or wind farms because it rains too much. 😂 😂
Ear infections
in Health ·
Justin Gonzalez87, you can't just joke around when it comes to ear issues. granitebadger25 already gave you the straight truth. 👍
Ear problems aren't something to take lightly. You have to consider the fact that a kid can end up with hearing loss even without a ruptured eardrum.
As for the pediatrician, find a new one. Doctors need to learn how to actually treat their patients. Five infections in two months isn't normal. This needs a specialist's eyes on it immediately.
Ear problems aren't something to take lightly. You have to consider the fact that a kid can end up with hearing loss even without a ruptured eardrum.
As for the pediatrician, find a new one. Doctors need to learn how to actually treat their patients. Five infections in two months isn't normal. This needs a specialist's eyes on it immediately.
The growing trend of smoking bans
in Health ·
Justin Gray89 said:It looks like some people on this forum just don't have the backbone required to actually quit smoking. It’s much easier for them to cook up these ridiculous excuses to keep their habit going.🙂
They won't find anything funny once lung cancer sets in. But their pride will probably stop them from coming back here to admit, "You were right."