The impact of power lines and substations

I have a bit of a dilemma—my parents have been searching for a place to buy for quite some time now, and we finally stumbled upon an apartment that seems perfect. However, we just realized there is a MASSIVE substation located only about 20 meters from the unit (I believe it’s roughly 30 kilovolts). I have heard various claims that people living in close proximity to substations and high-voltage power lines face higher risks of cancer or leukemia. We actually hired someone to come out and measure the electromagnetic field strength in the apartment, and I noticed the reading was around 250—though I am not entirely certain if that was in Tesla or millitesla. That said, the technician mentioned that within the European Union, the recommended limit shouldn't exceed 20, which would mean the field in this apartment is ten times stronger than what is "recommended." He also suggested that these fields don't really impact a person while they are awake, but rather only during sleep, and he is from Full Point. He mentioned that a mattress cover equipped with magnetic strips could potentially deflect the electromagnetic field, implying that since the issue primarily affects us while sleeping, such a cover might solve the problem. I suppose I am feeling a bit uncertain, though, and I won't be able to rest easy until I hear what you all think about this—specifically, whether EM fields affect humans during waking hours, and if a magnetic field actually shields against EM radiation. If anyone has further insights on this matter, you're welcome! 😁

EDIT: Are there any other effective ways to reduce EM radiation exposure?

Zachary Rodriguez32 said:I have a bit of a dilemma. My parents have been searching for a new place to buy for quite some time, and we finally found one that seems perfect. However, we just realized there is a massive substation located only about 20 meters from the apartment. I heard it might be around 30 kilovolts. I've also heard claims that people living near substations and high-voltage power lines face higher risks of cancer and leukemia. We hired a specialist to measure the electromagnetic field strength in the apartment. The reading came out to around 250—I'm not sure if that was Tesla or millitesla. The expert mentioned that within the European Union, the recommended limit is 20, which means the field in this apartment is ten times stronger than what is considered safe. He did note, however, that the field doesn't affect you while you are awake, only while you sleep. Full Point.He suggested using a mattress cover with magnetic strips to repel electromagnetic fields. His logic is that EMF exposure is primarily an issue while sleeping rather than during waking hours, so this would solve the problem. I won't be convinced until I hear your thoughts on whether EMFs actually impact us while we're awake, and if a magnetic field can truly shield against EM radiation. If anyone else has insight on this, you're welcome! 😁

Are there any other effective ways to reduce EM radiation exposure?

Measurement by... http://full Point I find them to be quite useless. I have checked multiple times.

Full Point uses those free "biopotential" screenings at shopping malls to trick people into letting them come to their homes for "free radiation testing." Once they arrive, their first move is to scare the living daylights out of you just so they can sell you overpriced "protective" covers.

Measuring alternating electrical and magnetic fields requires top-tier equipment. You also need sound methodology and deep technical expertise to actually interpret the results. Frankly, Full Point vendors just don't have that level of insight.

Regarding that electromagnetic field measurement you were shown: you have no way of knowing if the data is actually accurate, nor can you be certain whether the source is even located within that specific apartment.

Using professional-grade instruments from occupational safety firms like OSHA-certified contractors is incredibly expensive. To get an accurate picture of how radiation is distributed over time and space, you have to take measurements at multiple points both inside and outside the home, and do so at various different times.

If you search for "electrosmog" on Google, you'll find hundreds of links and countless studies regarding how electric and electromagnetic fields affect the human body. You will also see various regulations regarding exposure limits. In practice, however, these standards are essentially meaningless because this field still lacks sufficient scientific oversight.

Research findings can be contradictory, depending entirely on who funded them and what their ultimate goal was.

A few years back, when I was diving deep into this research, the only study recognized by the American Academy of Sciences showed a spike in childhood leukemia cases among kids living near high-voltage power lines.

Everything else is just a foggy mess of scientific and pseudo-scientific debates.

Bottom line: if you're looking at an apartment near a substation, skip it. Don't buy.

If you want to dive into the professional or psychological reasoning behind why I’m saying this, just let me know. I am here to help.

V.

P.S. A quote from "The Miami Herald."

Residents from the Dobri neighborhood, who are opposing the construction of the new 110-kV TS Dobri substation, have filed for an injunction. They want the court to prevent the utility provider from demolishing the existing 35-kV TS building at the site until safety measurements can be taken on the temporary substation. The court has requested that the residents submit their payments. $13 for measurement, and they've already submitted that request to the local utility provider.

boldsailor32 said:Bottom line: if a house is right next to a substation—don't buy it!

I'm with you on that.
Substations and high-voltage power lines are incredibly harmful, whether you're awake or fast asleep.

Bottom line—if you’re looking at an apartment near a transformer station, just don't buy it.

If you happen to be interested in the technical or perhaps even the psychological reasons behind my advice, I suppose I am available to discuss them.[

Please, could you share those technical and psychological reasons? It feels quite important to me! Regardless, thank you for such a direct answer!

EDIT:

Full Point uses these free "measurements" of some supposed "biopotential" in shopping malls to trick people into letting them measure the "radiation" in their homes for free—and once they arrive, their primary goal seems to be scaring the residents enough to sell them those "protective" covers.

Do those covers actually do anything, though?

EDIT 2:
I just remembered which units were used when measuring that apartment. What the guy from Full Point was measuring—and I think he did it correctly—were readings fluctuating around 250 (sometimes hitting 300) nT (nanotesla). I did a little digging online and noticed that the average magnetic field strength in the USA is roughly 60-70 nT, while in the United Kingdom it sits around 36-39 nT. Well... I suppose if anyone here has more expertise or experience than I do, perhaps you could tell me if 250 nT is considered acceptable, or if those "covers" from Full Point actually provide any real help!

Since I already know where this is headed, I’d love to hear the "expert" reasons why anyone would avoid buying an apartment next to a substation.

It seems some people here haven't the slightest clue what an electromagnetic field actually is, the different types that exist, or how they interact with the human body. For context, even X-rays are electromagnetic fields.

My stance is simple: a substation is harmless and has zero impact on the health of nearby residents—whether they're awake or asleep. Especially a medium-voltage 30kV unit.

But fine, let's hear the other side first. Why on earth do you think it's so dangerous??

P.S. This falls into that classic category: we demand constant electrical power because every household adds three new gadgets a year, yet we refuse to deal with power plants, nuclear facilities, hydro dams, or wind farms because it rains too much. 😂 😂

Come on, I’d love to hear everyone's take too—why not? (Not that I’d ever actually buy an apartment right next to a transformer station, and those cell towers aren't exactly my favorite thing either). I don't know if you guys heard about that situation in San Diego where five kids from the exact same classroom were diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma about three years ago. I think that classroom isn't even used anymore...

By the way, how EM radiation actually affects the human body is still pretty much an open question. All these different "healing" magnets they sell have such questionable results. They claim to lower blood pressure, but they aren't proven safe for pregnant women, they can trigger headaches or nausea, and honestly, the vast majority haven't shown any clinical effectiveness at all.

By the way, the folks over at Full Point are essentially retailers first and foremost, not engineers trained to actually measure fields like this. I actually got a look at that "biopotential" gadget of theirs, and honestly, it’s totally off base. My best guess? It’s probably just measuring resistance or something similar...

Casey Palmer5 said:By the way, the folks over at Full Point are essentially salespeople—not engineers trained to actually measure these kinds of fields. I had the chance to see that "miracle" device they use to measure "biopotentials," and honestly, it seems completely disconnected from reality. It probably just measures resistance or something similar.

The people at Full Point are primarily traders, and I suppose they’ll tell you to buy just about anything they have in stock. However, the individual didn't actually use that "biopotential" gadget; he used a different device which—in my estimation—measures both electromagnetic and electric field strength, so I don't doubt that part. But I do have serious doubts regarding his claim that the cover would actually protect you—he is a salesman, after all, and he wants to move his inventory... I mean, would an experienced professional tell you it's perfectly fine to buy an apartment if there's a 32 kV substation sitting only 20 meters from the building? I certainly wouldn't think it was okay.

Zachary Rodriguez32 said:The crew over at Full Point are salesmen through and through. They’ll tell you exactly what you want to hear just to move their inventory. This guy didn't even test that "miracle" potential meter himself; he used a different device that measures both electromagnetic and electric fields. I don't doubt his technical readings, but I definitely have my doubts about his claims regarding that protective cover. He's a salesman, and he's just looking for a way to sell that junk. Has anyone with more experience here weighed in on this? Is it actually okay to have a 32 kV substation sitting just 20 meters from a building, or should I steer clear of buying an apartment in that spot?

Four years ago, at an oncology conference, a rather chilling statistic was presented.

In the US, one in four people currently face a cancer diagnosis. Within the next decade, that figure is projected to climb to one in three.

Half of those affected will survive.

What does that mean?

If you have a family of four living in an apartment:

There is a 25% probability that any given individual will develop some form of cancer.
The probability that one of them will develop some form of cancer is 100%.
The survival rate for an affected individual stands at 50%.

In the near future, the probabilities for the same family would be:

There is a 33% probability that any given individual will develop some form of cancer.
The probability that one of them will develop some form of cancer is 130%.
The survival rate for an affected individual stands at 50%.

Excerpt from the oncology congress held in Chicago, 2003:

Cancer is currently the second leading cause of death in the USA, and the number of new diagnoses is steadily climbing. It is projected that cancer will overtake heart disease as the primary cause of mortality within this century. During a presentation regarding the secondary oncology prevention program at the Mayo Clinic, Professor Frontier highlighted how increasingly effective screening methods are becoming essential tools for prevention.

This is what things would look like in the world's major industrial powers:

Today, we recognize about 100 different types of cancer. It is highly probable that half of the male population in industrialized nations will face some stage of the disease, while nearly one in three women will be affected. Research indicates that by 2020, cancer will account for 50% of all deaths in the Western world.

Based on the texts above, it’s clear that whether you live next to a transformer station or not, the probability remains high that you, your siblings, or your parents will develop some form of cancer.

Being close to a transformer station certainly won't fix the issue.

Based on my experience in the field, residents living right next to electrical substations live in a state of constant stress. It is both subconscious and conscious fear regarding the potential impact of the facility. Measurement results and claims from utility experts stating that radiation levels are minimal and harmless simply don't help ease their minds.

The human subconscious can be incredibly destructive. It is capable of triggering unwanted organic processes, fueling them, or even outright causing illness.
If there's any actual physical harm being done to the body, subconscious fear can only amplify the damage already caused.

Let's apply this to your situation.

You’re buying an apartment. After a long search, you finally find the perfect one—and I assume the price is better than everything else on the market.

The reality is simple: apartments located near gas stations are harder to sell, which naturally drags down their market value.

The experts convinced me that the substation poses no health risks to this apartment.

You trust them, and honestly, it works for you in the short term. The housing prices are attractive, and it lets you solve your most pressing issue—finding a place to live—fast.

By the following year, you start feeling a subconscious sense of "danger" regarding TS. You’ll see conflicting reports pop up occasionally in the news or online, all claiming that the actual effects haven't been sufficiently studied yet. Even if there's no proof, whenever residents in an apartment building fall seriously ill, suspicion immediately turns toward the proximity of the local substation.

The catastrophe begins the moment you or someone in your household is diagnosed with cancer. I’m not saying "if," I’m saying "when," because the probability is incredibly high. For a family of four, the statistical likelihood in the near future exceeds 100%.

Any lingering subconscious doubt about radiation from a substation is quickly morphing into full-blown paranoia. This fear can trigger the worst possible reaction at the worst possible time, potentially preventing a patient from receiving necessary treatment and recovering in the comfort of their own home.

So, what’s the move here? Sell the apartment right now, at the absolute worst possible time, take a loss by pricing it below market value just to get it done, and move somewhere else? Is that really the plan?

Is it smarter to just avoid living near a transformer station altogether?

I believe those are sufficient psychological reasons to avoid buying an apartment near a transformer station.

We can dive into the details regarding those "radiation" levels and how to actually interpret that apartment measurement later on.

V.

Casey Palmer5 said:A guarantor measures resistance, or something like that.

That one sentence alone forces me to reconsider my entire stance on the female gender.

Zachary Rodriguez32 said:I’m facing a bit of a dilemma. My parents have been searching for a new place to buy for quite some time now, and we finally stumbled upon an apartment that seemed like a perfect fit. However, we just realized there is a massive electrical substation located only about 20 meters away from the property. I heard it might be around 30 kilovolts. I’ve also read concerns that people living in close proximity to substations and high-voltage power lines face an increased risk of developing cancer or leukemia. To be safe, we hired a specialist to come out and measure the electromagnetic field strength inside the apartment. During the reading, I noticed the number was hovering around 250—though I’m not entirely sure if that was measured in Tesla or milliTesla. The technician mentioned that according to European Union guidelines, this level shouldn't exceed 20. This would mean the field in this apartment is ten times stronger than what is recommended. He did note, however, that the field doesn't impact a person while they are awake, but rather affects them while they sleep. He is... Full PointHe suggested using a mattress cover equipped with magnetic strips to deflect electromagnetic fields, arguing that the primary issue is the exposure we face while sleeping rather than while awake. Essentially, he believes if we neutralize the field during rest, the problem is solved. However, I’m not entirely convinced and would like to get your take on this before jumping to conclusions. Specifically, do electromagnetic fields impact us significantly while we are awake, and can a magnetic field actually serve as an effective shield against EM radiation? If anyone else has insights or experiences regarding this, you're welcome to weigh in! 😁

Are there any other effective ways to reduce EM radiation exposure?

I spent some time browsing through the Full Point website recently. My initial impression was actually quite positive—I thought to myself, "Finally, someone who actually knows what they’re talking about." However, the further I delved into their content, the more unsettled I became. I honestly cannot recommend their measurements; to me, the whole operation feels incredibly disingenuous and purely profit-driven. While that first instrument (the HI-something) might seem legitimate based on its technical specifications alone, everything changed once I saw their bio-potential readings and that L-antenna setup. It was frankly eye-opening in the worst way. In my view, this is nothing more than window dressing. It's a tactic used to mislead the average person who lacks a deep understanding of technical implementation and measurement methodologies. They are essentially capitalizing on people's lack of specialized knowledge and their inherent naivety just to turn a quick, shameless profit.

Here is my recommendation: don’t take my word for it. If you are serious about getting accurate measurements, follow the advice given by boldsailor32 and hire a professional firm that specializes in industrial-grade testing. It won't be cheap, but if you're willing to invest in accuracy, it's the only way to go. Alternatively, you could reach out to the experts at the College of Engineering; I know several specialists there who focus specifically on measuring the harmful effects of electromagnetic radiation.

I work primarily with measurements of the Earth's natural electromagnetic field—specifically the Schumann resonances. My focus is mostly on the electric component, though I am familiar with the magnetic side of things. Measuring the magnetic component is actually the easier part; for instance, Full Point utilizes a coil with several hundred turns, but there is really no way to get a meaningful reading without using at least a few thousand turns. On the other hand, capturing the electric component requires electrode surfaces that are quite substantial. Because of this, you can tell just by looking at the physical scale of their instruments that something isn't quite right.

The actual measurement of the field isn't even the primary hurdle here. The far greater challenge lies in the correct interpretation of the data. Because there are so many potential sources, you have to isolate the specific signal originating from "your" local substation. To do that accurately, you would need a multi-frequency analysis using Fourier transforms, combined with measurements taken at various times of the day, throughout different seasons, and at multiple locations. This is the only way to properly filter out the background noise from both man-made and natural sources—at least, that is how we approach it from a purely scientific standpoint. I can't speak to how standard industrial technical measurements are conducted, but that is our methodology.

Actually, staying near an outdoor substation poses a greater risk than being indoors. When you’re inside a building—especially if you live in a high-rise—the electrical wiring and steel reinforcement in the structure essentially act as a Faraday cage, which significantly reduces the penetration of electromagnetic fields into the living space. Since we are dealing with very low frequencies, the walls themselves, combined with the random layout of electrical wiring, provide a pretty substantial barrier against EM waves entering your home.

If you are truly intent on shielding yourself from negative EM radiation, there is absolutely no need to waste money on those overpriced magnetic covers. Besides, what becomes of your head if it stays outside the shield? It’s easily the most sensitive part of your body. A simple Faraday cage should suffice—just suit up in some medieval wire mesh armor, throw on a helmet, and head to bed 🙂

Charles Turner said:That single sentence forced me to rethink my entire perspective on women.

I have to admit, I was just as stunned by that level of insight...

V.

Oleander said:I'm with you on that.
Whether we are wide awake or fast asleep, substations and high-voltage power lines carry significant risks.

Making a claim like that without providing any actual data or evidence is a massive stretch. Substations aren't "extremely harmful," but they aren't completely harmless either. There seems to be a prevailing mindset in our community that anything labeled as "radiation" or "EM waves" is inherently, catastrophically dangerous. To me, that just reflects a general lack of scientific literacy. It’s much easier to scream about how everything—be it GMOs, modern technology, or nuclear power plants—is toxic simply because it's something new and unfamiliar.

Now, that doesn't mean they don't have an impact. The problem is that determining the exact level of harm is incredibly difficult. Today, the baseline number of people suffering from cancer and other illnesses is already quite high. Because of this, it is nearly impossible to isolate a specific increase—say, 1 in 1,000 cases—and pin it directly on a local substation or a similar source. Even science struggles with much larger events; take the Chernobyl disaster, for example. It is notoriously hard to calculate the exact spike in illness caused by a nuclear catastrophe compared to the natural background rate of disease. Some estimates suggest an increase of roughly 0.015%, which is statistically negligible. This is why pinpointing the precise influence of substations and other EM emitters on health outcomes is such a monumental challenge.

We also need to recognize that, in the short term, EM waves at 50Hz frequencies are safe. However, their long-term effects haven't been fully established yet. The energy levels of these specific waves are far too low to trigger chemical, molecular, thermal, or genetic changes. That is a completely different story when you look at X-rays or radioactivity, where the energy levels are more than sufficient to cause such damage. Comparing the EM waves from a substation to X-rays or radioactive material is simply scientifically unsound.

Kate Diaz said:.
.
.
If you actually want to defend yourself against negative EM radiation, you don't need those overpriced magnetic covers. Besides, what are you doing with your head outside the cover? It’s the most sensitive part of the body. A Faraday cage is plenty. Just suit up in some knightly wire mesh, put on a helmet, and go to sleep. 🙂

You forgot to mention that the wire suit needs to be grounded to the third prong of a wall outlet for it to work at all. Otherwise, there's no effect. 🙂

For anyone looking to turn their home into a Faraday cage:

Drywall cage

V.

Casey Palmer5 said:I honestly wish I could voice my opinion on why people feel this way—not that I’d ever consider buying a condo right next to a transformer station myself, and those cell towers don't exactly sit well with me either. I can't help but think back to that situation in San Diego where five students from the exact same classroom were all diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma about three years ago. If I remember correctly, that classroom hasn't even been used since.

There is a lot of noise lately from people protesting the installation of cell towers in their neighborhoods. It’s a bit ironic, really—these same individuals use their smartphones constantly for calls and data, yet they are adamant that the tower shouldn't be placed near their property. They would much rather have the infrastructure situated under someone else's window. What most people don't realize is that, from a technical standpoint, being directly beneath a cell tower is actually one of the safest spots you can be. To maximize coverage over a wide area, these antennas are designed with a specific radiation pattern that is primarily horizontal. Because the signal is directed outward toward the horizon rather than straight down, the electromagnetic exposure directly underneath the tower is virtually negligible.

The impact of electromagnetic radiation on the human body remains a significantly under-researched area. Furthermore, many of these various magnetic devices marketed for "healing" purposes carry highly questionable efficacy. They can cause blood pressure to drop, pose unknown risks to pregnant women, and trigger side effects like headaches or nausea. Ultimately, the vast majority of these methods have failed to demonstrate any clinical effectiveness.

To be perfectly honest, I would never dream of wearing those kinds of "mumbo jumbo" magnets or magnetic covers myself. The fields generated by those devices are almost certainly stronger than the ones you'd encounter near a local power substation, and frankly, who knows what kind of impact they might have on the ferromagnetic compounds within our own bodies?

boldsailor32 said:You forgot to mention that you need to bond the conductive suit to the protective ground in a standard US outlet using a wire; otherwise, the setup won't actually work. 🙂

You have a point there. Otherwise, you just end up becoming a collector of charge and all those other "twisty currents" (if you can even find the right way to describe them in English). 🙂

Just be careful about which socket you're plugging into. You wouldn't want to end up looking like a knight in shining, glowing armor. 😁 😁 😁

I have a news article saved on my drive regarding the release of a book titled "Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Radiation." It was written by an American scientist, Dr. Dragan Poljak, back in 2002. I think it’s a pretty interesting read.

************************************************** *

What are all the various sources of electromagnetic radiation?

We have power lines, various TV and radio transmitters, radar systems, cell towers, mobile phones, and more.

Is there any actual scientific evidence regarding the harmfulness of cell phones?

As of now, there is zero scientific evidence proving that radiation from base stations or mobile phones is harmful. Electromagnetic energy deposits into the human body through radiation, but the only proven effect we see is thermal—essentially, tissue heating. Based on current scientific understanding, this effect is considered negligible. Whether other non-thermal effects exist remains an open question. The World Health Organization has highlighted three interesting categories of potential harm. The first includes substances proven to be carcinogenic, much like cigarettes or alcohol.

Coffee is likely classified among products that pose a potential cancer risk.


Magnetic fields from extremely low-frequency sources, such as those generated by power lines, are now classified as "possibly carcinogenic."

Has anyone ever attempted to reduce the magnetic field intensity around power lines?


WHO representatives reviewed recent initiatives and concluded that Italy is the only nation that has actually attempted to reduce these field levels. To lower magnetic fields from power lines, it would require an investment of $65 billion just to statistically save two lives per year.

Unfortunately, when you look at the bottom line, this move was rejected because the math simply doesn't add up.

Is there actually any meaningful way to protect people from radiation?

One chapter in this book focuses entirely on safety protocols. Obviously, the primary safeguard is simply increasing the distance between radiation sources and populated areas. Hospitals are the most vulnerable environments in this regard. From what I have observed, the safety measures implemented in our hospitals aren't particularly rigorous. Mobile phones can cause interference near sensitive medical electronic equipment. After all, it is common knowledge that you have to turn off cell phones during a flight to prevent unwanted interference.
To prevent these kinds of unintended consequences, developed nations have established their own sets of recommendations.
In Australia, mobile phones aren't allowed within two meters of medical equipment. French hospitals enforce a total ban. Germany recommends a complete prohibition on phone use in hospitals, while in the USA, restrictions apply only to specific areas within the facility. Over in the United Kingdom, bans are recommended for certain sections of the hospital.

What’s the deal with phone cases? How much protection do they actually provide to mobile users?

Those ferrite plates or "shields" do help lower field levels somewhat. Unfortunately, they don't target the areas where we are most vulnerable—specifically the eyes and ears.

But you did say there isn't any scientific evidence yet regarding the harmful effects of cell phones.

That’s the truth. So far, the only proven harm linked to mobile phones is an increase in car accidents—a point even the WHO jokingly makes. We need significantly more research before we can draw any real conclusions. A multidisciplinary approach is absolutely essential to determine how electromagnetic radiation stored in the body actually affects the human organism. To be clear, tissue heating remains the only established effect.

You often see heated debates in the news regarding whether cell phones are actually harmful. So, what is the consensus among the world's leading scientists?

When trying to determine if cell phones affect children differently than adults, you usually see two research teams at odds. It’s a genuine scientific war, complete with subtle academic insults thrown back and forth. One prominent American research leader, Professor Om Gandhi, argues that based on 1996 data, mobile phones are significantly more harmful to children. His reasoning is that kids experience higher induced electromagnetic field levels in the brain. On the other side, researcher Niels Kuester led a team in 1998 that debunked this, asserting there is no actual difference in field intensity between children and adults.

- Some research results suggest children using cell phones face an 80 percent higher risk of developing tumors. Are you familiar with this data or anything similar?

I personally align with the views of an American scientist named Gandhi, with whom I have collaborated and published a paper in the American journal IEEE Trans. On Electromagnetic Compatibility. My stance is that mobile phone use induces a higher field intensity in a child's head compared to an adult's. To address this concern, it might be useful to cite the World Health Organization's position, which states that "children should not be encouraged to use mobile phones." Beyond those two prominent research teams, there is actually a massive body of diverse studies regarding the potential risks of mobile phones today.

- Can you give me some examples?

For instance, it has been observed that irradiated rats exhibited behavioral issues. In maze tests, non-irradiated rats found the exit easily. Irradiated rats had significantly more difficulty finding their way out.

Epidemiological studies involving children living near high-voltage power lines are also quite interesting. Research conducted by Canadian scientists showed that leukemia rates were four times higher in children living near these lines compared to those living far from such radiation sources. Some Swedish studies support this, though American and Finnish studies completely refute it. Some research results might simply be the product of hypersensitivity or autosuggestion. In a sense, we are navigating murky waters.

That said, there are established exposure limits for electromagnetic radiation. Regarding safety standards and regulations, the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection—or ICNIRP—sets the guidelines for Europe.

- According to some studies, a person should wait 48 hours after a six-minute mobile phone call. Is that true?

I haven't heard of those specific findings. I think that is a bit excessive. It is a fact that people experience more intense radiation from using a mobile phone than from base stations, primarily due to distance. If a person is about ten meters away from a base station, the field they are exposed to is usually around 10 volts per meter. For comparison, the permitted radiation level under US standards is 16.82 volts per meter. When a phone is pressed against the ear, the field level can reach up to 100 volts per meter if it is right against the user's head. However, if you move the phone just a little away from your head, things improve significantly.

- How much better?

If the phone is just one centimeter away from the head, radiation drops rapidly. If you move the phone three centimeters away, the radiation is about two and a half times lower.

Do you have a cell phone?

I don't. Sometimes even a standard landline feels like a burden. I prefer using email. However, I am not naive; I don't think I can entirely avoid modern world nuisances like radiation and similar pollutants. I do believe, however, that mobile phones sometimes aggressively invade one's privacy. Just as I'm relaxing to some lovely music by Bob Dylan, Eric Clapton, or Neil Young, suddenly there's a ring and you hear: "Hey, Mate, is that you? It's me!"

************************************************** *

Dragan Poljak is an Associate Professor at the College of Engineering at the University of Split. He has published over a hundred scientific papers, mostly abroad. He is also a visiting professor and honorary member at the Wessex Institute of Technology in the United Kingdom.

Zachary Rodriguez32 said:EDIT:

Do those covers even work?

EDIT 2:
I just remembered which units were used when measuring that apartment! The readings from the guy at Full Point seemed accurate; the numbers were hovering around 250 nT, occasionally hitting 300 nT. I did a little digging online and found that the average magnetic field strength in the USA is about 60-70 nT, while in the United Kingdom it sits around 36-39 nT. Now, I’ll leave it to someone with more expertise and experience than me to weigh in. Is 250 nT actually acceptable? And do those "cover-up" types at Full Point actually provide any real help?

They don't actually work. Their only real function is providing a psychological boost to your resilience—provided you actually believe in them. 😁

A reading of 250–300 nT is quite a strong magnetic field. I doubt a transformer station is the source, though, especially since it’s sitting 20 meters away. Honestly, I have no clue what else could be causing this.
I still suspect some manipulation by the FP staff. It would be incredibly easy to fake those readings using a small battery-powered magnetic core oscillator tucked inside the meter or by simply tampering with the device itself. It is also quite telling that the FP employees refuse to provide a written report of the measurement, even after you specifically requested one. 😁.

If you want to be absolutely certain about your measurement results, take Kate Diaz's advice. Find someone at the College of Engineering who can handle the testing and pinpoint the radiation source. Alternatively, check out this page:

*********************************************
Is there an independent lab in the US that can test this type of radiation?

Yes. This type of radiation, along with many others, can be measured by Underwriters Laboratories in San Diego. They are an independent testing house that operates without any financial, political, or other outside influence. They hold all the necessary authorizations from NIST and focus exclusively on quality testing and measurements.

You can find more information at info@zik.hr, Or call us at +1 212 555 0198.

ZIK

**************************************************
It might be expensive, but when you're buying an apartment, it's worth the investment.

V.

I see this thread has really taken off! Since we’re already diving into all this radiation talk, what’s the deal with groundwater and those Hartmann fields? Does that stuff actually impact our health at all?
Or even sleeping north-to-south?

I know this is veering a bit away from pure physics, so please bear with me (I mean, I'm just a woman 😁 who somehow managed to ace my physics exams back in the day, even though I still feel totally lost sometimes 😂)...

A long time ago, some self-proclaimed "radiesthesiologist" (putting that in quotes on purpose!) used a pendulum over a map and told me I was sleeping right on top of a Hartmann field. To be honest, after moving houses a year or two later, I felt like things actually improved... though that could easily be due to other reasons, too.

And honestly, everyone knows by now that having cell towers on your neighbor's building is way better than having them on yours.

People around here say that the Flower Valley neighborhood is pretty loaded with radiation from all the local broadcasting towers and whatnot, plus there's a lot of groundwater nearby (though nothing surprising there given how close it is to the Mississippi). There's also this talk about the "Rockets"—those three incredibly ugly skyscrapers 😁—being hotspots for cancer cases. Of course, it's mostly just local hearsay, but it definitely caught my attention.