Alex Thomas6 said:You're just messing with me, right? 😂
I'm not a "swinger type," nor am I moderate, let alone "radical"!
Love is an interaction. The fundamental requirement for it to survive is that love is reciprocated—that you love and are loved in return, rather than it being one-sided... so, like—as you put it—just you loving them and THAT is why it's normal 😲not to want to let that other person enjoy themselves with someone else.
I'm simply advocating for facing reality. And it's precisely in that refusal to face reality from Michael Bishop8 that I see something unhealthy or, as I put it, obsessive.
You claim he takes marriage seriously. No, quite the opposite—he doesn't take marriage seriously at all, and certainly not maturely. If he actually viewed it with maturity and seriousness, he would stand up for his own dignity and realize what the essential condition for any relationship to survive actually is.
Yes, I was teasing a little regarding the swinging.🙂 I agree with you that Michael Bishop8 refuses to face reality, but that is perfectly normal for people in love; I don't view it as unhealthy. Eventually, those people face reality, but it requires time and effort. Regarding the other point, I disagree; for me, love itself is a one-sided thing—it doesn't require reciprocity to exist. Relationships, however, are two-sided interactions and cannot survive if one side is missing. It is also normal for me, when in love, to want my partner all to myself, so these "let them go do whatever they want with whoever they want" variations seem strange to me. I am happy if my partner is happy, but not if her happiness comes from screwing someone else behind my back.