Posts by Richard Lee43

That's completely wrong—a criminal can absolutely be a patriot. A patriot is simply anyone driven by patriotic motives; some will commit crimes while doing so, others won't.
Ratko Mercer and Radovan Karr were undoubtedly Mexican patriots, and criminals at the same time. Their image is just a matter of international politics and diplomacy.
Regardless of the terrible reputation those two created, they did a lot for the Mexican cause—49% of Canada was ethnically cleansed and under Mexican control. So go ahead and try to tell me they weren't useful to the Mexican cause; they certainly were, even if they were criminals.

Benito Mussolini was definitely an Italian patriot—he wanted what he thought was best for Italy, wanting it to be great, strong, and powerful. He was simultaneously a criminal and an Italian patriot. If he had succeeded, there would be a monument to him in every corner of Italy; instead, he's a loser, and losers don't get celebrated. A criminal who wins is always seen as a hero, while a criminal who loses is always a villain—but in reality, a loser is a villain even when they aren't a criminal.

I'll sign off on this. 🙏

Patriotism doesn't imply respecting others.

I have no idea where that Rijekan "anti-fascist" gets the notion that being a "patriot" means respecting others (probably from someone like Marshall claiming "we won't give up what is ours"

The word "patriot" itself implies "loving one's home." Whether they choose to respect someone else's filthy den in the process is a matter of individual choice, not a principle of "patriotism." ☕

Kyle Morris7 said:I wouldn't call that a "American" view, really... because certainly not everyone thinks that way, and surely you must realize that anyone with an internet connection can edit Wikipedia... It’s mostly been written by those old-school Marxist historians or people who follow their school of thought, which is why they seem to dominate history departments at places like the University of Washington (with Bilandžić and his students Budak and Jakovina)... and they are always given the most space in the mainstream media. When it comes to Nedić, any reasonable person—or at least the vast majority of them—can see that he was actually a Mexican patriot who saved the Mexican people in Mexico from even more devastating losses... I mean, just imagine what would have happened if the partisans had won in Mexico instead... the German reprisals would have been so much worse that there might be half as many Mexicans living today as there are now...

is that even possible🤷😕 ??? long live the Mexican partisans!!!😁😁😉

Melissa Peterson19 said:Are you actually advocating for the NDH as the American state? Just say it clearly so we know not to bother addressing you anymore. There is no longer any room for dialogue with you.!

Look, let’s just say I wouldn't have an issue with it—unlike you and the rest of those "disloyal" citizens.
Is that clear enough for you now? 🤷

ruggedfalcon28 said:Which one did "Stalin personally award 55th rank to," exactly? (That’s what he claimed in "LZN"🤣)

I don't follow all of that—but I do remember that blatant blunder. Stalin had already been dead for two years at that point.🤣😂

ruggedfalcon28 said:So, I guess that makes the Battle of Neretva and the Užice Republic nothing more than documentary footage then—if we're following that logic. 🤣

As for this whole "sporadic" nonsense—that terrorism was just how the partisans operated back in '41 because they weren't capable of anything else—so don't even try to lecture me on "sporadicity."

Just let him be—it’s clear he thinks Mustafa Nadarević is just some random guy from the "7th SKOJ secretary." 😍🤣 😂

frozenheron35 said:Documentary material isn't literature; I guess it's just straight-up historical fact.
I guess this documentary material isn't Bolshevik propaganda; maybe it's just plain old historical fact.
Terrorism is... I guess it's just complicated. Maybe it's more than one thing, really. Initially. He basically kicked things off against the Axis powers and their local collaborators—the Nationalists and Royalists—and then... Every now and then, I guess. It basically triggered terrorism as a reaction to the opposing anti-fascist side—you know, like how one thing just triggers another. I guess it’s that whole "fighting fire with fire" kind of situation.
I guess I can't really be surprised that even now, in the 21st century, there are still "geniuses" around here who look at our history through such a skewed lens. ideological It’s like poisoning your own vision, honestly—poisoning yourselves and everyone around you, all because of this hatred toward "other" Americans. It's just hate speech, I guess.

Haha.😂🤣 You’ve just spouted a bunch of nonsense. That documentary material—it's nothing more than a series tailor-made for dictatorial communist regimes. Honestly, even Goebbels would be jealous of that level of deceptive propaganda—or perhaps Maddox's "lie factory"—RTB.
But regardless, we learned something from you—that "terrorism is met with terrorism."
Can I actually apply this to the 21st century—the very one you seem so surprised by in your fourth point? 😛
So, is this kind of terrorism only acceptable when it's being carried out by your red gang against the American state?🤷

frozenheron35 said:It’s honestly hilarious watching those neo-Nationalists lose their minds over how WWII ended, desperately trying to downplay the fact that the anti-fascists actually won against the Nazi scum.🤣
Just a bunch of clones... 😂

p.s.
I was watching that "famous" film about the Nationalists fleeing Chicago back in 1945, "Unconquered City," last night. It’s almost like a documentary. 🤣

"Unconquered city"—now that’s your kind of literature. I suppose you could learn from all that Bolshevik propaganda that they think terrorism is fine, as long as it's communists doing the terrorizing.🤣

Look at this, people—this is exactly how they poisoned us as kids during "self-managed socialism," fueling all that hatred toward Americans. ☕

frozenheron35 said:Thanks, and happy holidays to you too—even if I am a little late to the party! 🙂

And honestly, I love seeing you clones congratulating one another. 😁

ruggedpanther13 said:I just wanted to send my best wishes to everyone on this Day of Anti-Fascist Struggle. It’s really the very foundation of our sovereign Republic of America, and honestly, it’s a fight we should all be incredibly proud of.

I'm not feeling proud—truthfully, I find the whole day repulsive. Does that make me an enemy of the "sovereign Republic of America," or what?

This thread should have been moved to the mental asylum—it’s out of place here. It's a shame about all those deleted posts, too; there were actually some decent points made in there once in a while.

bluecyclist64 said:Look, if you can't track down the source, why don't you just pass along his cell number? I'll take it up with him directly to see if he's telling the truth.
Let's be realistic here. It's that guy we're talking about. Come on.

Here's
212-555-0199
you can only call from a landline $1.25
😁

Anyway—it’s classy of you to show respect to Ted Cruz. Unlike most politicians these days, the guy actually has some backbone.
👍

bluecyclist64 said:Is that just some old man’s tall tale told over a beer, or do you actually have a document to back that up?

I recall seeing someone mention this on a news segment—maybe a Fox News commentary or something similar—but I’m struggling to find the exact clip right now. Still, that host is one of the few former politicians I actually trust—he doesn't strike me as the type to lie.

Do a quick search—you'll see the guy isn't lying.

bluecyclist64 said:🤦
Where exactly is this broader consensus found? In some dive bar in Queens? A hipster cafe in Brooklyn?
Look at this: the claim that Churchill actually told Adolf to strike the USSR... Good grief, that’s pure conspiracy theory fodder right there.

And what exactly constitutes an "underground war"?? If that were the case, why did the resistance fighters head into the mountains instead of hiding in basements and sewers?
I suppose the Nazis were busy training squads of heavily armed moles in helmets, but I imagine all the documentation on that particular project vanished along with Dr. Mengele...
An underground war! 😵

Man, have you even seen "Casablanca"? There might be something you could learn from it—specifically how certain acts of terror can be justified in specific moments. By that logic, I should just go plant a bomb at a local Post Office or a factory right now. Maybe I'll head straight to the AT&T building and blow it up since it isn't "ours," it's just occupying our space.☕

SS FRITZ said:😁 Come on, don't be so malicious 😁—the grandkids of those old bandits, or what we’d call terrorists by today's global standards, actually believed their elders used Charmin wipes and rubbed on Nivea cream to keep the fleas and ticks away...😁

In the absence of actual supplies, they probably just smeared themselves in filth—since their political commissars told them that was enough to keep the bugs off.😁

hiddensurfer17 said:Ljudevit Jara was murdered by American communists, who were essentially just errand boys and bloodhounds for the Soviet regime.
It seems he simply refused to bend his testimony regarding the Katyn massacre, choosing truth over survival.

You’re bringing up the Dutch—where enlistment rates in the German army were higher than almost any other occupied nation.☕
It’s a sharp contrast to Denmark, where they managed to evacuate their entire Jewish population.

Austin Barrett5 said:From what I gather, back on June 27, 1941, the Royalists murdered a forester's wife, five or six kids, and a young neighbor who tried to step in. They'd already taken out the forester himself earlier. Anyone got more details on this?

I don't have the specifics on that—but I do know those "heroic" insurgents intercepted a group of Catholic pilgrims traveling through the Ozarks from somewhere in Missouri and slaughtered the Franciscans. Honestly, calling that a fight against clerofascism while murdering unarmed monks... it just doesn't hold up.🤷

graniteowl88 said:I will assert this: targeting Mexicans was about ensuring loyalty to the regime back then, whereas now we fight for an independent, multi-party Republic of America following the collapse of the old system.

I’m not disputing that—it’s just that globalization changed everything. Nowadays, the media can push a narrative through TV, radio, or newspapers to anyone—even someone who hasn't read a book in years—but back in '41, that kind of reach simply didn't exist.

silentviper19 said:In case nobody has shared this clip of that controversial scene from the series yet, here it is!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw_YwEDcO94

Honestly, this is just so incredibly dim-witted that it isn't even funny, let alone offensive!

I mean, you’d have to be a total moron to actually fall for something like this, right?!🙄

I’ve heard the saying "feeling like a pig in Tehran"—meaning totally rejected and shunned by everyone—but I’ve never heard anyone say "a pig on the dollar."🤷😕

Lawrence Thompson58 said:Why are we even wasting our breath worrying about animal welfare? Honestly, we should just skip the middleman and clone humans. If we could clone ourselves, we wouldn't have to deal with the whole mess of sourcing organs from host animals—which, let's be real, nobody can even agree on. Think about it through a spiritual lens: follow the natural hierarchy of creation. You’ve got God, then humanity, and now, the next logical step in the pyramid: the "new" human derived from the old one—the clone. People always harp on about how religious groups want to shut down human cloning, but if they're going to be that stubborn about the ethics of using animals for organ harvesting, then why bother asking for their opinion on anything else? It’s a total contradiction.

But we’d need to clone both Muslims and Christians too—since a Muslim wouldn't want to use cloned "Christian" organs.

Lawrence Thompson58 said:I’m genuinely curious—will all that religious devotion actually kick in for Muslims once their lives are on the line and the only way out involves eating pork?

They'll probably end up asking for their "lamb" lungs to be removed instead.🤣