Posts by wearyharbor41

Alexander Kern58 said:Hey there!

Everyone’s headed for eternity—live in Jesus, or die in this fake world.

I’m not here to play theologian or act like some preacher; if it’s His will, He’ll find someone else to do the witnessing.

I’m just looking for people who are truly free in Jesus. Maybe they don't even realize it yet, as long as they aren't fighting Him or stuck in some cult of personality or rigid dogma.

If God is their spirit and their truth...

And I mean actual truth, not just some intellectual theory or emotional hype (which is just a lie).

There was this one guy here before, I think his handle was Krishnamurti.
His signature said a time is coming when we'll see who follows the Spirit and who just follows the money.

So, anyone who isn't out here paying for books, expensive seminars, or data plans just to "elevate" themselves is potentially
welcome. (Seriously, if you think breathing exercises and yoga poses are "spirituality," please just skip this one):

Let's stick together and win in Jesus against this world of losers (that's what I call the miserable souls of this world—if I'm wrong, feel free to set me straight).

Regrettably, such people are rare, as the harsh conditions of this world tend to break one down at the very roots during childhood.

In my estimation, finding anyone of substance in this prison we call the world is a difficult feat; perhaps one might stumble upon a few credible channels on YouTube to facilitate some distant connection, but even that falls short. I, too, am unfortunately among the captives. While I find myself sharing your sensibilities, I would be hesitant to pursue a physical meeting, simply because you are a woman, and I should prefer to avoid any unnecessary chemical reactions or attempts by The Matrix to exert control over us through such means.

Socializing online or via phone is certainly an option.🙂

Casey Bennett said:forget women and the fact they might not even want to carry a child for nine months, enduring hours or even days of labor. who asks them, right? they aren't here to think or feel; they are simply there to give birth since they clearly know how to spread their legs.
and in orphanages, as everyone knows, children are just blooming with anticipation, and it is merely a matter of time before a wonderful family adopts them.

let's just shut down the internet and head back to the Middle Ages with those lustful old hags!!!1!
if you ask me, I would strip them of their right to vote too. goodness knows who decided women should have anything to say or do on their own accord!

By that logic, one could justify absolutely anything, given that everyone acts as their own absolute truth;
a child is not merely an extension of the mother's body, but a distinct entity—a separate living being that, by definition, ought to possess its own rights. furthermore, the role of the state should be the care of children as an investment in our collective future. the fact that our government feels disorganized or chaotic is a failure of leadership, which in no way diminishes the core ideology or the stance I have laid out here.

The pregnant woman also deserves state protection, and there really shouldn't be much debate regarding that point.
the notion you expressed about someone "not wanting to carry" is quite selfish and, frankly, pathological, unless we are discussing extreme cases like sexual assault or serious medical necessity. however, even in those instances, society and the state should provide enough support to maintain a decent standard of living for both the child and the mother.

driftingtinker said:I think I'll wrap up my part of this debate here; I’m practically rushing toward a time machine to skip straight to the 22nd century.

We might conclude our little back-and-forth, yet I remain quite puzzled as to what exactly is being contested; I have simply presented a legitimate perspective that, if properly developed, could actually save lives.
The core concept itself holds merit, provided one takes the time to flesh it out.
If by "the 22nd century" you are implying a future defined by servitude and the slaughter of innocent—or even guilty—souls, then I fear you are indicting your own humanity and ideological standing.

driftingtinker said:The reasoning follows immediately after, which you "accidentally" neglected to mention.

I am somewhat unsure what you are referring to, as the original post has been deleted, and I certainly don't have the capacity to recall specific details beyond the general sentiment of the message; if you wouldn't mind clarifying, it would be most appreciated.

It appears someone saw fit to scrub my legitimate contribution from the discussion regarding abortion—specifically, my suggestion that instead of opting for an abortion, children could simply be placed into state care or with foster families. I am somewhat perplexed as to why my post was removed, and I would be most grateful if someone could enlighten me as to the reasoning behind such a deletion.