Curfew restrictions: Is it legal to leave your house?
in Coronavirus ·
Jerry Robinson56 said:How exactly is a "ban," which isn't even a ban, but rather a controlled measure, considered idiocy?
You need to grasp that you are potentially a danger to others, yet you are acting as if you are the only one who matters. It’s like driving at 130 mph on a highway and claiming, "Well, I always drive like this," right before the crash...
Do you still fail to understand the objective here? It is about isolating the outbreaks.
I doubt such a rigorous form of quarantine would have been feasible today, given that there are high-level professional responsibilities requiring travel... naturally, there is a 14-day period upon return... but still.
Quarantine has nothing to do with those historical maritime republics in the way you are presenting it. Such practices were utilized in parts of Africa for centuries before the concept of modern order took hold, often involving the burning of the infected along with their entire village... The infected were not permitted to leave their huts, thus preventing them from spreading the contagion to others.
The historical examples serve only to demonstrate that isolation is the only reliable measure. We still know very little about this virus, and it is referenced as being among the most dangerous pathogens when it reaches an unprepared location.
At least, that is how it is being framed.
This merely highlights your lack of civility. A pass does not prevent the spread— where on earth did I write or even imply that it was a "cure"? .. you are trivializing my position through your own projections and words.
... a pass functions like a manifest on a shipping vessel... it ensures information is received, so they don't have to call stations for verification, and so on...
If one were to inquire about the coffee machine or the instant thermometer $17 — let's say, from a place like Walmart... you might struggle with the sensor whether you use the pass or not when the LCD fails to glow green 😁 .. I am merely jesting ..
In all seriousness, do try to be reasonable and accept that the deficiency lies within yourself rather than the system.
One need only observe the current state of affairs these days ...
If you want a policy to actually work, it needs a damn target. You can't just throw restrictions at everything and hope they stick. It has to be aimed at something specific, and honestly, in situations like this, the oversight needs to be incredibly tight. ☕
How can anyone not see this? The guy clearly hasn't a clue, and apparently, our brilliant Minister doesn't either.
That policy doesn't actually target anything. It’s based on "residency," which is a joke. On one hand, you’ve got Washington, D.C. with a million people, and on the other, you have tiny rural towns with maybe a hundred souls. It's meaningless.
And when it doesn't matter to anyone else either, then it's pretty obvious this "measure" isn't actually aimed at anything at all.
It literally makes zero sense. They left movement completely unrestricted in the biggest hotspots with the highest infection rates—even in Washington, D.C., where there are a million people just wandering around like nothing's happening.
Even more importantly, there’s zero way to actually enforce this "famous" measure. Controlling something like this is basically impossible unless we start begging the US government to lend us their entire police force, the military, and all their high-tech gear. Only then—and that's a huge if—would we maybe, just maybe, have enough boots on the ground to pull it off.
Drop the link to the map. I mean, you can't even tell how many there are in the photo unless you zoom in...

So, those green lines represent the municipal borders we're supposed to be watching. If they actually want this movement ban to work as a controlled measure, they’d better start by actually monitoring those boundaries and the movement itself first. 🙂
It’d be pretty interesting if someone actually sat down and crunched the numbers to figure out the physical distance here. We could even start a betting pool to see how many miles it really takes to cover it. What do you think—is it more or less than... 62 miles ?
Maybe if we actually imported enough military and police force from the US, we might stand a chance at controlling this measure...
Then we’ve got this other headache: that famous "golden ticket" issued by a massive, bloated mess of employers, task forces, doctors, and whatever else.
So, I guess we also have to keep an eye on them and their issuance if we want this to actually be some kind of controlled measure.
And then, just to top it all off, they’ll probably expect us to be out there on the ground manually verifying those permits too. Great.
You're talking about a policy that’s a complete joke. It’s literally impossible to enforce, let alone actually control. Total farce.
This isn't some "controlled measure." It’s pure, unadulterated chaos that nobody can actually manage, and all it’s achieved is a massive, pointless waste of money.
The effect was exactly the same as if Beroš had just calmly asked everyone to stay put. Honestly, his polite request probably would've kept people from moving even more than this whole "measure" nonsense did.
