133 posts shown.
Ethan Perez97 said:If Kurt Cobain were out of the picture, you all would still be sucking up to him, though I certainly wouldn't be participating in such mindless sycophancy. 👎
😂 😂 😂 Come on, take a breath. You really need to watch your blood pressure. 🙂
It is worth making an attempt, even if it fails.
Kevin Chavez3 said:You are uninformed, narrow-minded, and quite frankly, ignorant. Even if technical proficiency actually dictated musical quality—which it certainly does not—at least two members of The Clash were phenomenal instrumentalists, specifically Mick Jones and Topper Headon, while the others were more than competent. I couldn't care less whether you personally enjoy the band or not, but I have zero patience for pseudo-intellectuals barking about subjects they clearly don't understand. So, get lost.
:clapping: :clapping: 🙂 👍
urbannomad30 said:Please, stop disrespecting classics like Stairway to Heaven, Hotel California, Smoke on the Water, and Wish You Were Here.
That isn't true, though those tracks have become undeniably tedious to everyone under the sun. They are objectively good songs, but they have been played so relentlessly that the novelty has completely evaporated. Personally, whenever I hear Smoke on the Water come on the radio, I immediately switch the station because I simply cannot stomach it anymore.
Crippled said:I actually appreciate and understand music, unlike the masses who just lose their minds to country hits or techno.
They enjoy it just fine, and they understand it too, which is exactly why they lose themselves in it.
N/A said:Music essentially breaks down into three distinct categories: serious compositions, Rock—not Metal or punk, but pure, classic Rock—and absolute garbage.
It is quite impressive how much more you can talk out of your ass than I ever could. 🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂 :asshole: :asshole: Congratulations.
granitesailor98 said:How on earth can you even attempt to compare heavy metal with country music?!
It is quite simple, really, and frankly, the comparison is valid because country music is far more pleasant to listen to and actually possesses a coherent sense of purpose.
Listen, legends... I just finished watching those two hilarious sketches, and now I'm waiting on the third one. I honestly think I've seen every single parody he's ever made; the guy is an absolute icon. His ridiculous little lines are just perfection—like when he walks into a restaurant and the waiter offers him his coat, and he snaps back, "Yeah, it's mine... and I've got the receipt to prove it." 🙂
😂 😂 😂
Nice... if you're implying what I think you're implying... but if you're just asking about picking an activity on the schedule, you could go with aerobics, volleyball, handball, or basketball... whatever floats your boat. To put it bluntly, you can basically jerk off ***** (well, obviously not since you're a woman... hm, maybe with someone else), the point is just stay active... do whatever you want.
bluejackal14 asserts:
As for Josip Lisac, I have the distinct impression that he’s become increasingly performative as the years go by; he used to be far superior, and he certainly didn't strain his voice quite so much back then.
I find myself holding the exact opposite view. To my mind, her artistry improves with every passing year; she has significantly expanded the sheer range and power of her voice compared to, say, her work in the seventies. Perhaps that perspective is mine alone.
When did she even know what she was going to say?
Would one of you be so kind as to define the distinction between a legendary band and a cult band? What exactly is the difference?
Nicole Baker said:Prove it. 😳
I assume she’s good at it.
I have my four queens: Janis, Tina Turner, Aretha Franklin, and Tina Turner (😁 😁 who would be Tina Turner 😁 ). Now, I’ve added a fifth to the ranks....
I discovered her recently... and honestly, it was overwhelming. She is the only voice capable of toppling my original four. Her talent is terrifying; you simply have to hear it because nobody else sings like this. People used to claim that woman from Madredeus had the saddest female vocals in existence, but please... give me a break.
You need to listen to Inez Andrews. She even performed with The Caravans....Words can't capture it; you just have to experience it. It is such a powerful voice, loaded with raw pain, fury, despair, and an incredible resilience all at once—a mix of pure disappointment and sheer determination. No, really... my opinion doesn't matter here. You just have to hear her. The very first time I heard her sing, I was moved to tears. It is pure genius, something truly unlike anything I've ever encountered. These are just words on a screen, but people, you absolutely must listen to her, regardless of who you are.
Justin Taylor said:I hear you... and you aren't arguing out of caution. There is a much higher probability that you'll run into some idiot looking for a fight over this than finding someone who will actually respect your perspective.😎
That is precisely why I advocate for discussion. Engaging in debate does not inherently necessitate physical violence. People do not engage in brawls simply because of differing tastes.😁 😁 However, I am curious as to what kind of experiences have led you to believe someone would physically assault you just for having a different opinion. Perhaps you are simply surrounded by the wrong crowd?😉 😎
Justin Taylor said:Fine, if you want to frame it that way... I personally find a certain soul within Dream Theater... specifically in their music, but primarily in their lyrical depth. They have substance.
But honestly, there’s no point in debating this, because you can't argue with taste. 😎 😎
Well, that is precisely what I was explaining to you—that "soul" is perhaps the most subjective element in existence. You perceive a soul in Petrucci and Joe Satriani, whereas I do not. I feel it in one artist, you don't. It is as simple as that. It is an energy you receive from a specific musician, and I struggle to describe it any other way. It is just that "something." That connection is entirely individual. Some people will resonate with it, others won't. Occasionally, we might both feel it with the same artist, and other times we won't. It is simultaneously simple and complex.
As for your other point, I find the notion that "you can't argue about taste" to be one of the most foolish arguments out there. I am not attacking your specific statement, but the entire concept itself is vapid and meaningless. The idea that taste is beyond debate is nonsense. 🙄 🙄 Why on earth shouldn't we debate it?
feralstag11 said:I’m just waiting for Nimoya to start preaching about how we’re all just children who don't appreciate DT because we lack sophistication, claiming we'll finally "get it" once we grow up. It's absurd; there's nothing to grasp here. As Gianluca rightly pointed out, his guitar playing is nothing more than a mindless list of notes and a desperate race against the clock.
I highly doubt that will happen. Based on my email exchanges, I have always found Alan to be an incredibly reasonable and tolerant individual. He is free to enjoy what he listens to, but he isn't going to lecture anyone else about their taste.
Justin Taylor said:Yeah, seriously... I get where you're coming from... it’s incredibly tough to listen to a band that maybe messes up only two or three times during a three-hour set!!!
Give me a break... what a load of nonsense. Real bands stumble at least ten times, if not more, during a performance. 🙂 🙂 😵 🤮 🤮 👎 👎
What does that even have to do with anything? I don't think Ed was talking about literal technical precision; he meant they might be precise, but they lack everything else. What I call "soul." That's exactly what Kenneth Edwards3 is getting at regarding the sterility of Dream Theater. They can be professional and technically perfect, but what's the point if there's no soul in the music? And jumping straight to claiming other bands mess up ten or more times is pure speculation, nothing more.