Posts by Daniel White9

What is the process for submitting a balance sheet and an income statement through the IRS e-file system?

Also, how do I include the schedule for fixed assets?

🙂

So, I finally got my certificates from the Fintech agency, set up the USB drive, registered for the IRS portal, the whole nine yards...

I can see all the tax forms on the IRS site, including instructions on how to fill them out and submit them, so there's no confusion there.

But what's the deal with Goldman Sachs?
On the Fintech app, I can't find where to actually complete and electronically file that specific report. 🤔
...all I see is "my profile" ("User Data," "Issuance," "Reissue," etc.), but that's it.

I just don't get where the Goldman Sachs section is; it really should be straightforward. 🤣

Henry Chavez5 said:If the certificate holder is the authorized official for the business it was issued to, then all you have to do is register through the e-filing application.
If the certificate wasn't issued directly to the business owner (say, it's for an accountant, an employee, or someone else entirely), then you’ll need to visit the local IRS office with power of attorney forms to get officially authorized to work.

That’s perfect, thanks!😁

Zachary Hughes12 said:If it's just for your own company, there's no need to visit the IRS in person.
You just need to submit an electronic business request through the official portal.
Once you get the confirmation email, you should be good to go...

Is this actually true? Nobody has replied yet.

I just picked up my digital certificate from Goldman Sachs—it's on a USB stick.

I haven't installed it yet, but I'm about to.😁

Do I really need to go down to the IRS to set up my online tax account, or am I right about how this works?

Megan Ruiz13 said:You're all feminists now.😬

Even this complaint is just an attack on the decent guys over at the men's corner—including a highly respected moderator there whom we all listen to and respect.😳

It’s always the feminists causing the drama. You're stirring up trouble again for no reason.

It’s honestly pointless. It happens because people don't get the point of the men's corner, so we end up fighting constantly.🙂

And what about the moderator, Aaron Harris2?
He shut the thread down because it was inciting violence. 😁

Megan Ruiz13 said:Time to give you the view from the muški kutak...😳

And there they go again, the feminists are attacking. 🤷

Honestly, with this kind of PMS-driven feminism, the mods and regular guys on this forum are fighting battles every single day.

Scanning through the subforum, I’ve realized that censorship in the muški kutak only seems to target the moody feminists. Everyone else can blather on all they want until they drive my respected colleagues crazy... and then what? You're left with nothing.🤷

Look, if you can't handle some guy banter, just shut down the muški kutak entirely....

And regarding those gay topics—come on. This is the muški kutak: grabbing beers, watching TV, porn, boobs, hookers... and then suddenly, "oh, let's bring in the gay topics or we'll be violating someone's rights." Give me a break...🙄

Just open a separate subforum for gay people and call it a day. 🤷

Feminists have their own space, but nooooooo, they just *have* to invade the muški kutak....😁

That’s the kind of nonsense going on over there.

😂

Well... maybe it would be helpful if you actually took a moment to look up what feminism actually means, just so we can avoid these kinds of blunders.😁

MK constantly sees attacks from some sort of feminists... much like how the Church sees communists everywhere.😬

Aaron Collins25 said:I’m completely on board with this and fully support the idea, though I have to say I’m firmly against deleting anything at all.
How are we supposed to figure out what went wrong if everything has been deleted?

I’m honestly not quite sure what your issue is with Charles Fox10. From where I’m sitting, he seems like one of the better moderators we have on here, and I don't even know him personally.

Please, let’s be reasonable here—I would really advise against throwing out such silly ideas. If we aren't careful, some wannabe intellectuals might actually take them seriously, thinking they've found a golden opportunity to jump in and try to act smarter than everyone else.

I honestly find it hard to believe that the thread was locked on the grounds of supposedly inciting violence. If you ask me, it was shut down because of this massive uproar and the whole "witch hunt" vibe—it felt more like an Inquisition being carried out by a few self-righteous forum members.

There are definitely households where one parent refuses to discipline, which usually results in the other parent becoming the "designated enforcer" to balance things out.
In my case, my child received a punishment because they were being abusive toward me, even though I was never treated that way myself.

I first discovered this forum about a year ago and have read through a massive amount of threads. To be honest, I couldn't make heads or tails of most of the debates, mostly because the long-time users with hundreds of posts tend to act like they belong to some elite club, often "jumping" on any newcomer who tries to join in.
Because of that, I've set aside most of the pdf-ov, but my favorite topics remain the occasional TV jokes, health discussions, and MK.
For me, this forum is a place to relax, have some fun, and pick up interesting tidbits, and MK really is a standout favorite.
I actually managed to convince my son last night that the crew over at MK is fantastic and that the debates move as fast as a halftime show during an NFL game; now here I am reading and wondering just how far "human stupidity" can go (there's that saying, "the universe and human stupidity are infinite, but I'm not quite sure about the universe"—that quote by AE makes perfect sense to me right now).

What do you mean—you don't believe him? 🤔
He literally said it himself, just read it:

Child abuse, violence against kids, and all that—I absolutely do not condone any of it. For that reason I am closing this topic right now.

Wait, are you saying he's being a bully? 🤔

Hey rustydrifter10,

Lisa Rodriguez84 said:No, actual abuse is when kids are being mistreated at home—like an alcoholic mother, or a father who blows the entire paycheck on drugs and booze and then comes home out of nowhere to beat his wife and kid. That’s abuse. And in those situations, kids go... anywhere, as long as it's far away from them.

If a kid is smart enough—and let's face it, kids are getting sharper by the day—they can ask someone to take them away, whether it's foster care or whoever else, because that is their right!

But look, we already know what we're dealing with here, and none of us have high expectations for your input in a debate anyway. 🙂

Alex Barnes8 was constantly being subjected to things like this—and those are just the mild versions—yet the conclusion drawn (by others, including you) was that she was just trolling. 🤷

redviper32 said:🤦
Well, yeah, that's true, I guess, but it isn't actually a crime under the Penal Code. I honestly don't quite get why that part seems so hard for people to wrap their heads around!

And once again:

Promoting or justifying illegal acts is strictly prohibited on this forum, and under Family Law (Section 88), it clearly states: "Parents and other family members shall not subject a child to humiliating treatment, mental or physical violence, or abuse."

Megan Ruiz13 said:He clearly didn't know what he was talking about. You guys jumped to conclusions way too fast. Who knows what was going through his head—thinking we’re out here torturing little kids or that there are even any deaths involved? 🤣 😁

Every once in a while, you get some random newcomers who lose their minds the second they wander into the guys' section. They have zero clue about the history here or the nuances of the community. They don't know the regulars—most of whom are just decent guys who enjoy the kind of low-key, chauvinistic banter that actually fits this corner of the forum. 🙂

If I recall correctly, we have a few ladies here who are regulars and actually know their way around a kitchen when it comes to making a good pie. 😁And they don't even have any issues. 🤷

Look, I’m saying it again: you're overreacting. You've crucified this guy over absolutely nothing. It's total nonsense... so much for your feminism. Honestly, what a joke. 🙂

Actually, it’s usually the other way around; when those trolls push back using that classic "MK spirit," that's when the MK crowd starts losing their cool. 🤷

And as for all this mockery—don't you think it should actually be a little bit funny? 😁
Or do you honestly find bitter responses like suck it to be peak comedy? 😁

Laura Chavez93 said:The entire MK really ought to be abolished ☕

I think you're being a bit dramatic.
In my opinion, all we really need is for the users over in the MK section to stop calling for the moderator every single time someone snaps back at their provocations.😁

Question:

If the topic wasn't actually advocating for child abuse, then how does it make sense that the moderator (who claims here that there was no need for such a massive uproar) shut it down with these words:

I absolutely do not condone child abuse or any form of violence against children. For that reason, I am closing this thread immediately.

Hmm...🤔

hollowtrucker77 said:On MK, the whole debate is actually pretty reasonable, considering the core issue is how some people choose to label certain behaviors as hyperactivity
Maybe I’m just not dim-witted or dull enough for my own good, but personally, I haven't noticed any actual, attention-grabbing problem on MK

Aaron Harris2 said:As an MK moderator (though I didn't manage to catch up on this thread last night, given it was only just opened), I wish to state my position clearly: I am firmly opposed to any form of physical abuse or corporal punishment directed at anyone, and most especially against children.
Furthermore, I believe that censoring the opinions of users on this forum is a deeply harmful practice, one that runs directly contrary to the recent directives from the forum owners regarding a more relaxed approach to moderation. To be precise, I am referring to the deletion of someone's lived experiences and personal perspectives. While I certainly do not condone calls for violence or similar behavior, which absolutely ought to be penalized, we must protect discourse.
For the reasons stated above, I have closed this topic, and if you ask my opinion, it shall remain so. If you desire a sanitized, clinical discussion, you are welcome to take it to a specialized child psychology PDF or perhaps join a dedicated group on Facebook.

Long live MK!

Oh boy. 🤦

Nice try, but you completely missed the mark.😁

If there’s any censorship to be found on this forum, it’s coming straight from MK. It just seems like that censorship is specifically targeted at anyone who... They aren't. The inventory over there.

If you're looking for the ultimate sensitive souls on this site, look no further than the MK section.
What should we call these types of users—the ones who constantly force moderators to step in because they resort to insulting people just because they can't find a clever comeback? It’s like they lack the wit or the imagination to actually win an argument, so they just gang up on someone ten-to-one instead of using logic. Then, the moderator swoops in, hands out a single yellow card to one person, and just wipes the rest of the posts clean.
I suppose one shouldn't go around offending anyone from the MK. 🤷

There is an entire series of examples like this; for instance, the most recent one is currently a hot topic. Divorced mothers seem to have a distinct advantage when it comes to gaining custody of their children—it’s a clear byproduct of modern feminism..
Alex Barnes8 was dealing with a massive wave of chauvinistic attacks on the forum. At first, she handled it with incredible grace, choosing to just ignore the insults from those MK users—even though their harassment wasn't being moderated. But the second she finally decided to stand her ground and fire back, she was hit with a red card.
Since they couldn't find a way to actually counter her well-reasoned arguments, the users just resorted to frustrated insults—it seems they're already used to having someone shield them from reality.

Well, that’s just plain sweet.😁

Hey Charles Fox10, I have to ask—why was Alex Barnes8 getting hit with so many red cards while those vulgar, insulting posts from that guy from MK just get deleted without any penalty? Specifically, brightcrane56 quoted her post and, apparently unable to come up with anything remotely intelligent, just wrote... Go screw yourself.That post was deleted within minutes instead of being sanctioned.

It’s honestly hilarious watching some people on this thread try to paint MK as some chill, laid-back spot that everyone else is just out to censor. If that were actually the case, they’d be complaining about the thread titled—get this—😁) How does one go about sabotaging a Pride parade?
From what I can see, that thread is sitting there perfectly fine without any moderator deletions for homophobic remarks, and the only ban issued there is—get this...😁) on this post. Basically, someone had the nerve to suggest the title sounds like hate speech and deserves a red card. I don't want to upset whatever sensitive little soul from MK is offended. 😁
That’s enough about how "laid-back and joking" MK supposedly is.

Those constant sexist outbursts that they try to pass off as "just a joke" fail immediately—as soon as some woman on the forum manages to shut them down with actual wit (which isn't hard 😁), these immature types can't dish it out. Instead, they resort to insults, swearing, and calling for the moderators. 😂

Aaron Harris2 said:As an MK moderator (though I didn't manage to catch up on this thread last night, given it was only just opened), I wish to state my position clearly: I am firmly opposed to any form of physical abuse or corporal punishment directed at anyone, and most especially against children.
Furthermore, I believe that censoring the opinions of users on this forum is a deeply harmful practice, one that runs directly contrary to the recent directives from the forum owners regarding a more relaxed approach to moderation. To be precise, I am referring to the deletion of someone's lived experiences and personal perspectives. While I certainly do not condone calls for violence or similar behavior, which absolutely ought to be penalized, we must protect discourse.
For the reasons stated above, I have closed this topic, and if you ask my opinion, it shall remain so. If you desire a sanitized, clinical discussion, you are welcome to take it to a specialized child psychology PDF or perhaps join a dedicated group on Facebook.

Long live MK!

:facepalm :🤣

One teacher at my old high school was named Righty. I honestly have no idea what happened with her parents, but students would constantly corner her in the hallway just to ask, "Hey, where's Lefty?" 😁
And then there was this girl in the choir named Charlotte, but her name was spelled in such a weird way that everyone thought it was hilarious.

It feels like there are so many ridiculous names out there nowadays

Karen Harris26 said:I never actually said I had an issue with my own bans.

Honestly, I agree with this. My main question is more about why there seems to be a double standard. I'm not claiming it definitely is, but it really looks like the people getting banned are those who aren't part of the "inner circle"—you know, the ones who aren't constantly hanging around here.

Why hasn't this specific post been flagged yet? It definitely deserves a ban more than mine did, considering I got hit on this exact same thread. Plus, it’s already been reported to the mods.

Karen Harris26 said:And why hasn't this post (which is arguably the least constructive one out of all of them) been banned? 🤷We can't claim the moderator missed it; we know they were online.
Just so nobody thinks I'm just complaining for the sake of it, I've already reported the post.👍
Let's see how they handle it.

Look, I'm not even pushing it—it's not that big of a deal to me.
I'm just pointing out the unfairness and asking that things be handled more consistently moving forward. After all, rules are supposed to apply to everyone equally.
😉

Thanks. 😍

Regarding the thread Jobs That Really Get Under Your Skin, I was reading through a short debate on the PDF Kokošinjac where some people were complaining that certain professions were being unfairly insulted and so on... maybe the discussion itself is off-topic, but I’m curious why only one participant (me, obviously, since I only made one single off-topic post compared to others who have been rambling on about it for ages) got a card? And a red one at that??? Do I just not have enough posts for mod Hannah Davis18 to treat me the same way she treats everyone else?🤷 Where can I actually find these rules? 🤔

Specifically, here, a forum member whose post I was replying to has already made a second off-topic comment; after my post (which earned the red card), they posted yet another off-topic remark and didn't get anything.

And why this post (which is arguably the least constructive of them all) hasn't received a card? 🤷 It's not like the mod missed it; we all know they were right there.
But look, so it doesn't seem like I'm just complaining, I went ahead and reported that post 👍
We'll see how they react.

So yeah, I'm just interested in understanding the rules used to justify treating some people one way and others another, just so I know what to watch out for.😁