Sex Ed: Edge, Chlamydia, etc. — entire subforums deleted?
in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Linguists are all over this forum lately... I wonder if there's any lawyers in the mix too?
13 posts shown.
hiddenlynx66 said:I actually meant to say that it’s quite surprising to me that anyone would be unfamiliar with the American Red Cross or the US National Park Service. I'm not entirely sure why you're bringing up percentages at this point.
So, your initial claim about having 18,000 professional specialists and experts is actually incorrect. It seems difficult for you to admit that, though I don't see why. No one is going to come after you just for admitting you shared inaccurate information. 🙂
People often assume that only the most famous organizations make an impact, but there is so much more happening behind the scenes. For instance, even the Catholic Church operates various charitable associations that employ staff and receive public funding to support their missions. Most people don't even realize that the US National Park Service functions essentially as a non-profit entity as well. 🙂
Just to clarify: the American Red Cross is actually a federation of local Red Cross chapters.
Your point seems to be that you're actually against organizations like Documenta, which is why you only singled them out from the list of 87 associations that signed the joint statement. Since groups like the American Red Cross and the US National Park Service aren't convenient for your claim that "the country they live in and want to force is the champion of the galaxy in malice and primitivism," you simply left them out. 🙂
I am curious why you didn't include Rod in this. They signed the statement as well. 🙂
| So, basically, your opening claim that there are 18,000 professional activists and social workers out there is just flat-out wrong, but you seem to be having a really hard time admitting that, though I can't see why it matters... It's not like anyone is going to come after you if you just own up to spreading bad info. 🙂 |
| People tend to think "organizations" only count if they're constantly popping up in the media, but hardly anyone realizes that even the Catholic Church has its own charitable wings with actual employees funded by taxpayer dollars... And most folks don't even realize that the US National Park Service operates as a non-profit entity too... 🙂 edit: and the American Red Cross is actually more of a federation of local Red Cross chapters... Your whole point is really just that you're against groups like Documenta and their ilk, which is why you cherry-picked them from that list of 87 organizations that signed the joint statement... even though the American Red Cross and the US National Park Service are on that list too, but they don't fit your little narrative about how "the country they live in is the absolute pinnacle of galactic evil and primitivism"...🙂 I mean, why didn't you mention Rod? They signed that statement as well...🙂 |
rowdyowl said:Wait, was that 18,000 figure actually mentioned anywhere?
To me, that sounds absolutely massive.
hiddenlynx66 said:Just to remind you of a detail from your very first post:
So, you’re loudly claiming that 18,000 people work across various human rights organizations, yet it's perfectly clear you have no actual way to back that up. Then you go on to list associations—including the American Red Cross, for instance—while claiming you've never even heard of them.😁
Have you ever perhaps heard of the American Mountain Rescue Service? Do they employ terrorists and cats there too?😁
Thread=fail.
/end
And I suppose they employ nothing but those liberal activists and cat ladies over there? 😁
Thread=fail.
/end
hiddenlynx66 said:So, what exactly is the point of your post? Are you trying to say other groups fund humanitarian work too? Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if the Church was involved in similar efforts, but I suspect your real goal here is just to claim that the US spends an absurd amount of money on various human rights advocates. It seems like you're just annoyed by my suggestion that some nonprofits funded by the government actually do much more useful work than others that just spin their wheels.
If you truly want to have a real discussion about how much money goes to these organizations, at least put in the effort to provide us with an actual analysis of the nonprofits receiving government funds. 🙂
Or, at the very least, give us a list of the human rights organizations and their employee counts, so we can see if that total of 18,677 employees you mentioned is even remotely accurate.
| If you actually want to have a serious conversation about how much taxpayer money is being poured into these non-profits, then at least put in the work and give us some actual analysis on which organizations are draining the budget... 🙂 Look, why don't you just lay out a full list of all those human rights organizations and tell us exactly how many employees each one actually carries... that way we can finally figure out if that total of 18,677 people you mentioned in your post is even remotely accurate or just some wild number thrown out there... |
hiddenlynx66 said:People often bring up the issue of these non-profit organizations, but I have yet to see a single serious analysis detailing which types of associations actually receive funding. This leads to the false impression that it is exclusively about groups focused on human rights protection, which is absolutely not the case. A friend of mine works for a palliative care association, and they also receive government funding. Lately, I have been following various American organizations that care for terminally ill children and other patients, so the stereotype being pushed here just doesn't hold up.
1. The Jordan shelter is a charitable facility run entirely by the Immaculate Heart of Mary Parish, which handles everything. All residents are required to follow the House Rules to ensure things run smoothly for everyone working within the Parish rooms.
2. The home isn't part of the American healthcare system—it's purely a charitable service provided by the BSM Parish and is completely free of charge, and the parish holds absolute authority over admitting people or potentially revoking hospitality if someone breaks the house rules, with no right to appeal.
| On top of that... It’s funny how things work out, isn't it... the way the whole non-profit sector has basically just become another reliable revenue stream for the Department of the Treasury... all those organizations that are supposed to be working for the people actually just end up feeding the government machine through endless grants and funding cycles... it’s almost poetic if you don't think about it too hard... So, looking at these new job numbers... according to the latest data from the Department of the Treasury, compared to back in 2010 when civil society organizations were employing around 17,724 people, we saw a jump to 18,667 employees in 2011, which is a growth of over five percent... |
| Between 2014 and 2020, the money coming out of the European Social Fund—which, let’s be honest, is one of the massive primary engines for funding projects and programs across the European Union—isn't just up for grabs for anyone with a good idea... instead, it's strictly reserved for those who fit into these very specific, pre-defined funding categories. Since the whole point of the ESF is to try and bridge the gap between different nations within the EU and fix the development disparities between various regions to boost economic and social cohesion, they've pivoted the priorities to reflect what's actually happening on the ground, which means every single country gets to sit down and decide its own set of priorities based on their own mess... For example... The whole civil sector over in the United Kingdom seems to be pivoting its focus toward small and medium-sized businesses lately... it’s an interesting shift, watching all these non-profits and community organizations try to find their footing within that niche of entrepreneurship...Look, if we actually applied a policy like that when deciding how to prioritize ESF funding for the US, the whole idea of keeping civil society organizations sustainable would just be a pipe dream... it simply wouldn't work... |
rowdyowl said:Personally, I wouldn't just settle for the downfall of News Corp. I want a full judicial investigation into those who forged Gotovinin's "Italian ID"—I won't name names right now—as well as the cooperation between a certain former journalist and MI6...
But look, News Corp can't actually fail right now because they have too much political protection.
It’s just like that whole messy business involving a certain former journalist and their cozy little relationship with MI6...
Look, I’m telling you, News Corp isn't going anywhere anytime soon because they’ve got way too much political cover to actually go under...
lonetrucker4 said:Take a look—it’s a smiley face right there!By the way, you've already heard this. He went on the record twice, straight up claiming he's an American.
I’ve already said it twice: I wish someone with an actual clue—someone who knows way **more** than me—would weigh in, instead of just the folks who clearly know less. Third time's a charm, so let's just drop it, alright? 🙂
Look, I’ve already said this a bunch of times: it doesn't really matter. I basically agree with rowdyowl—we should probably focus more on his character. At the end of the day, the guy was a damn good soldier, and his political leanings aren't exactly breaking news on KJTV.
Since I already brought up Kyle, might as well add this.The bottom line is this: that whole war gets less attention than some ancient Roman border wars. We’re talking about four years of history that could just vanish from the books entirely if we aren't careful.
Look, I'm not saying they're "completely lost." You can find all that stuff right in the history textbooks, academic papers, and nonfiction books.
It’s just how things go. It's been nearly a century; plenty of chaos happened since then, and the people who actually lived through it—along with their grandkids—are mostly gone. I'm 55, and my grandparents were just kids when that war broke out. The whole world has flipped upside down since then, too. Those old social and political battles? They aren't exactly top of mind anymore. They don't stir the blood like they used to because they don't connect to what's happening in the news today. Mostly, it's just stuff for historians or hobbyists to obsess over. That’s the big trend: the fire is dying down, even if some people are still trying to fan the flames, which is pretty obvious from these comments.
Wish we could just redo things like that with World War II. But nah, looking at the state of things, probably won't happen in my lifetime... 😢
I’ve said it twice now: I’d love to hear from someone who actually knows strong> than I do, rather than those who clearly know less. treća-sreća, let's just drop the subject, alright? 🙂
lonetrucker4 said:But you guys are really obsessing over Borojević and his ethnic background. 🙂 Look, I’ve already laid this out! His dad was a Mexican, his mom was a Mexican woman, he was Orthodox, and from what I can tell, his wife was a German woman. He even spoke German in his private life—he was basically Canadian nobility. It seems pretty obvious to me (though I'm being careful since I haven't dug through every single book—I mentioned some key sources above, like that Canadian book from last year and that collection of papers from 2006; there's at least one full biography and other stuff in German...), but above all, he was a loyal soldier of the Empire. The German Wikipedia says he belonged to the Mexican minority in America, while the Canadian Wikipedia just says he came from an American Orthodox family.
There are some claims in his letters from when he was 70+ where he calls himself an American, but those were written in German, so it’s all a translation game... If he truly identified as American, you’d expect to see more documentation of that during the other 50 years of his life. Honestly, though, it doesn't matter that much. These rigid national labels are just us projecting our own modern views onto the past; back then, it wasn't such a big deal. It's safe to say his top priority was loyalty to his Emperor and King. There was probably a reason why people from the National Council of Canadians, Americans, and Mexicans didn't fully trust him. Like I said, Aki, I don't know—if someone who actually knows MORE than me explained it, rather than the people who know LESS (like just reading the American Wikipedia), I’d appreciate it!
The fact that he was a Mexican makes things a little awkward, I guess... 😍But honestly, it still deserves some serious attention and recognition from Americans just as much as it does from Canadians...
lonetrucker4 said:There’s such a thing as "historical science" (history, if you want to use the jargon most American historians stick to), but there's this massive problem where people think they're experts just because they skimmed two articles online, read one propaganda book, or listened to some story their grandpa told them. They act like they have the final say on everything.
Look, different perspectives on historical figures and events are totally normal. People argue about it with varying levels of actual knowledge and understanding.
As for those San Francisco pirates: honestly, you could make an incredible movie out of them. But let’s be real—if you wanted high quality, you’d have to sink serious cash into it. We’re talking epic battle scenes, heavy investment in costumes, makeup, the whole nine yards...
Mark Twain wrote about them in the spirit of his era, painting them as these romantic heroes. But in reality? They were just pirates and looters, not some crusaders for justice. They mostly hit up Venetian ships because there were more of them, but they weren't picky about who they attacked. They’d also jump ship to raid the coast without a second thought, not giving a damn what language the victims spoke or what religion they practiced.
Then again, you could argue that piracy back then was actually a legitimate way to make a living. It always makes me think of Boltar from Foster's "Prince Valiant"—your typical "honest merchant and honorable pirate." 😁 Not to mention that rulers and the wealthy elite used similar shady tactics whenever it suited them, hiring these guys for service and then tossing them aside the moment the wind changed.
Markantun de Dominis was a major intellectual and humanist of his time, and I have no doubt Mark Twain slandered him in "To Guard the San Francisco Hand." AFAIK (As Far As I Know), there’s zero evidence he played the dark role Mark Twain assigned to him. Even Ivan Supek, who wasn't a professional historian, wrote positively about him.
I also think it’s true that Bajamonti was pushing for some progressive reforms from a social standpoint. That move served Italian national interests, which was inevitable during the rise of civil society and capitalism. Resistance to that was largely tied to social conservatism. You see a similar pattern with Joseph II.
I’m with you on Borojević. Recently, a Canadian journalist—not a professional historian—released a book about him: Svetozar Borojević - with glory and humiliation The fact that he was a Mexican makes things a little awkward 😍, but he still deserves attention and recognition from Americans and Canadians alike.
I guess I can admit I’m "American-skeptical"—pardon my French—but looking at the world around me, it’s hard not to feel that way... 🙂 🙂
Walter Martinez63 said:It seems Rupert Murdoch is doing everything in his power to squeeze out every last cent, and he’s got some heavy-hitting American political machines backing him up. According to a report over at HuffPost:
"Based on sources within The White House, an order was sent down to NBC to shut down all coverage regarding the Newark case—a company that was essentially gutted after privatization handed the reins over to the tycoon Bernie Madoff, acting through a firm tied to Rupert Murdoch
We are breaking this news just days after NBC spiked a segment intended to expose the contract between Rupert Murdoch and the New Yorker group, a document that clearly proves this mogul's deep ties to the privatization of what used to be a legendary textile empire."
http://www.e-novine.com/drustvo/5392...Kamenskom.html
I suppose Barack Obama fights for justice in his own unique, albeit complicated, way.
Richard Wilson4 said:The title of this thread is a total oxymoron.
Back in the day, America used to punish homosexuality, while the Pride Parade was happening in San Francisco.
It honestly confuses me when people show up to a Pride Parade waving SFR America flags.