Posts by Kimberly Perez3

Hey there!

I know this might be a bit out of place, but I couldn't find a better 😁

to dump this question. So, basically—for those of you who have actually sat down and deconstructed the new sales tax forms—it seems pretty obvious that section III.1 covers everything (the 5%, 10%, and 25% rates all lumped together as total amounts). But what I’m tripping over is where the data for fields III.2 through III.5 is supposed to come from? Is it pulled straight from the standard sales tax filings—assuming my logic isn't totally broken here?

silverwalker27 said:?

I think there was a slight misunderstanding.

I handle whatever an investor requires—it’s just a "serious business" sort of thing. I know things get hectic, but if the rush is constant, it usually points to something else—either a personal choice (some people just thrive on chaos and hate sitting still) or simply a lack of clear priorities.

We all only have 24 hours in a day; pretending otherwise is pointless. Plans have to be realistic within those constraints—otherwise, they aren't really plans at all.

Ugh, my bad 😁 I totally messed up—I mixed you up with the original author 🙂

I was talking about those moments where a rush is unavoidable, but me? Being in a constant state of frantic hurry isn't really my thing. Though, I will admit, I've got a bit of a high-strung temperament—kind of a "fast lane" person. Honestly, nothing bugs me more than people who move at a snail's pace. They just come off as clumsy or half-baked to me, though I can't quite put my finger on why.🤷

silverwalker27 said:People who are perpetually in a rush—to me—seem to lack any sense of priority; everything feels equally urgent to them. Plus, there is the matter of temperament—some people thrive on a fast pace, while others prefer a more relaxed, steady rhythm. I realize that workloads can spike suddenly, making a bit of a scramble inevitable, but we are talking about those individuals who are CONSTANTLY rushing through life.

Regarding the concept of laziness—the only thing that truly matters is whether you are fulfilling your responsibilities correctly. You don't have to dance to someone else's frantic tempo. As long as you are getting your work done properly, you aren't being lazy.

You still haven't answered my question about what you do for a living.

Morgan Bishop4 said:Or maybe I’m just moving in slow motion? Though, honestly, I don't think that's it...

I seriously don't get why some people lose their minds if everything isn't finished this exact second, or if a project doesn't start immediately, or if you don't knock out every single task today instead of leaving it for tomorrow. Like, chill out.

I can't stand it when people try to rush me through things that aren't even urgent enough to matter whether they're done today or next week! 😠 It’s not like I’m sprinting to catch a Greyhound bus; there’s always another one rolling into the station ten minutes later anyway, so what's the big deal?

I really prefer doing things at my own pace, and I just don't understand the obsession with getting everything done right this instant... (my mom is driving me absolutely insane lately).
It's like everyone thinks they have to pull an all-nighter like some Wall Street intern, instead of just finishing up by 3 PM like a normal human being.

Okay, but... what's actually going on here?
Am I just lazy? Am I like that grasshopper from the fable who kept putting everything off until tomorrow, only to freeze to death once winter hit?
Or is it that the people constantly rushing around have some kind of disorder, or they're just incredibly impatient, or whatever...🤷

Is it just that people have this weird psychological need to turn every little thing into a high-stress crisis, or am I actually just being lazy? :/

Look, I've noticed that I'm constantly rushing. And that's mostly because I have a mountain of responsibilities (which is totally my own fault since I keep piling them on myself). Since you don't really care which "flight" you catch—not in a bad way, obviously—it's probably because you don't have as many obligations. I'm guessing you're still in college or high school? Sure, organization is key, but sometimes when your schedule isn't entirely under your control, you end up rushing all the time. I don't know about anyone else, but for me, that's just how it goes...

Jerry Bailey47 said:You completely missed my point. Believe me, I would love nothing more than to shop online constantly, but unfortunately, I just can't. 🙂 What I meant was that the dresses I actually like on ASOS—the ones that would actually look good on me—tend to run in the $100-$200 range (which is basically what I ended up spending on the one I finally bought). Look, weight isn't the issue for me, but I'm busty, and finding off-the-rack pieces that fit properly without trying them on first is an absolute nightmare. It’s even tougher if you’re plus-sized. I was trying to say that you have to account for way more variables than someone with an "average" build; you have to obsess over the cut, the fabric, and—for instance—making sure my bra straps don't show. Since I can't wear a strapless bra to save my life, I’m stuck with spaghetti straps or one-shoulder styles, which narrows my options significantly. And once the selection shrinks, you lose all control over the price point. Last year, I struggled so much looking for this one specific dress—hunting for two whole months both online and in stores—that I seriously considered skipping meals for a month just to afford something that actually fits and makes me feel comfortable. You have to understand that when you carry extra weight, the cut and how the fabric drapes (or holds you in the right places) is everything. That is incredibly hard to judge online, let alone on a budget. And what’s the point of spending $20 if the dress doesn't even fit? Then you're stuck dealing with returns—and *that* is the real hassle. 😉

Between this year and last, I’ve been to 14 weddings. Ten of those were close family stuff where it’s always the same group of people, so obviously, I needed different outfits—and yeah, I got them all from ASOS.

My cousins and friends have asked me a million times where I got my dresses, and on average, I’ve paid about $20 per piece. Just to be clear, I’m far from skinny—I’m not an XXL or anything—but things don't just "fit perfectly" on me, and the hunt is a marathon. Around here, I know my size, I don't hesitate, and I just buy. Even if I do have to get something altered (like that maternity dress I bought once—it was gorgeous and only $20, but it was huge in the stomach), the tailoring ends up costing me $6.75 more, and honestly, you wouldn't find a dress like that for that price in any Zara or any local boutique around here (a formal dress under $67 is basically a myth!).

So, there's no way we can compare our prices to online shopping, especially when you factor in the customs fees and shipping they tack on.

Jack Gray51 said:You basically took my "logic," twisted it into this weird little bucket, and now your conclusion doesn't even match what I actually said.
Basically, what I was saying is that I find it totally bizarre how people have zero issue dropping $267 on a dress they’ll wear once or twice, yet suddenly act like spending $133 on everyday clothes—stuff you'll wear for at least two years and probably ten times a month—is some huge deal.

Yeah, I honestly don't get it. Especially when we're talking about a city that isn't exactly mid-sized and where having decent, well-made clothes actually matters.

I mean, look—you buy a shirt in NYC for like $30, wash it three times, and the seams warp so bad it looks like trash. I'd much rather go to an upscale spot in the Upper East Side and spend $83 on something I can wear for three years where the stitching actually stays put.

@Peter Gray2: yeah, you're right, you aren't gonna find a high-quality gown for $50. But do you seriously think some pair of jeans from Topshop in NYC for $50 are going to be just as good as a $150 pair from Esprit or Mustang or whatever?

Let's get real here—just because something has a higher price tag doesn't mean it isn't cheap junk. I've wasted so much damn money on jeans from Esprit and S.Oliver only to have them stretch out two sizes between breakfast and lunch. Now, I just pick up stuff at Target for $50 and they don't lose their shape no matter how many times I throw them in the wash. It's not a universal rule, but hey...

Nathan Baker said:It’s a nice sentiment, I suppose... but I’m just not the type to go buying things blindly without doing my homework first. Though, I suppose if these pieces mean something special to other girls out there, they might reach out to you—I noticed your signature, after all.

Look, just try buying one cheaper thing first—once you realize how much easier life is, you’ll be hooked. And honestly, you don't have to wander around half-dead through shops that barely have any decent selection anyway. It’s not like some place like Zara can charge a premium for basically a standard rag$267, which goes for like 15-20 bucks on Asos.

I was never really "that girl" (ugh, would this even look good on me? disaster, total nightmare, I can't even find anything when I'm trying things on), but obviously now I know which cuts actually work for my body, so I stick to that range—and yeah, the sizes are pretty much exactly what they say on the tag.