casualtiger2 said:
You probably misread the intent—which happens when people cling blindly to dogma.
A personal legend is actually quite credible, contrary to what you think.
Instead of just blending into the crowd and following the herd, everyone should try to find their own "life story."
Basically, figure out who you are, look at where you're standing in this world, and live according to your deepest needs based on that reality.
That's what a "personal legend" is, and there's nothing wrong with it.
Sure, someone might see it as an egocentric trip, but there’s no real difference between that and New Age stuff, Christianity, Islam, or Hinduism.
Christianity isn't any more "authentic" (whatever that implies) than a person's drive to explore, understand, or follow other paths.
PS
I honestly wonder how someone smart and sensitive can get behind teachings—full of violent, outdated elements—and an institution that has historically caused so much harm.
You probably misread the intent—which happens when people cling blindly to dogma.
A personal legend is actually quite credible, contrary to what you think.
Instead of just blending into the crowd and following the herd, everyone should try to find their own "life story."
Basically, figure out who you are, look at where you're standing in this world, and live according to your deepest needs based on that reality.
That's what a "personal legend" is, and there's nothing wrong with it.
Sure, someone might see it as an egocentric trip, but there’s no real difference between that and New Age stuff, Christianity, Islam, or Hinduism.
Christianity isn't any more "authentic" (whatever that implies) than a person's drive to explore, understand, or follow other paths.
PS
I honestly wonder how someone smart and sensitive can get behind teachings—full of violent, outdated elements—and an institution that has historically caused so much harm.
You probably misread the intent—which happens when people cling blindly to dogma.
A personal legend is actually quite credible, contrary to what you think.
Instead of just blending into the crowd and following the herd, everyone should try to find their own "life story."
Basically, figure out who you are, look at where you're standing in this world, and live according to your deepest needs based on that reality.
That's what a "personal legend" is, and there's nothing wrong with it.
Sure, someone might see it as an egocentric trip, but there’s no real difference between that and New Age stuff, Christianity, Islam, or Hinduism.
Christianity isn't any more "authentic" (whatever that implies) than a person's drive to explore, understand, or follow other paths.
PS
I honestly wonder how someone smart and sensitive can get behind teachings—full of violent, outdated elements—and an institution that has historically caused so much harm.
People were asked why they vote for Party X when they've been stealing for a decade. They just say, "The old guard is already fat; the newcomers still need to get rich."😉
Old religions have had their dark eras, but over time they've become diluted or rigid. There is no longer a need to spread truth through fire and sword, though it still happens—look at Islamic fundamentalism or the "crusades" for oil in the Middle East.
"New Paths" still have to face the sharp turns, steep cliffs, and dark alleys where you might get mugged for a few bucks. Sometimes exploring uncharted territory is a mistake; sticking to proven patterns is safer. You should experiment, sure, but know the risks. During the hippie movement, chasing new paths via drugs was common in subcultures, only for people to later discover the consequences—liver failure, brain damage, death.
Regarding the "personal legend," if you know people, 99% of the time it's just an ego trip. That 1% that is actually worth something is rare. Is it worth valuing 99% of foolish innovations just because of that 1%? It’s like small Silicon Valley startups. Only 1% become massive successes; the rest fail. No bank is going to hand a startup a million-dollar loan just so they can "play around."🤣